More damage : Guns or swords ?

Started by Ronny7 pages

Re: More damage : Guns or swords ?

Originally posted by grey fox
Just a little thing that has my curiosity worked to the bone .

Which does more damage a gun or a sword ?

Think about it , a bullet can hit it's target in the arm , and the victim can survive . Yet a well placed sword stroke and suddenly the victim needs an amputation . It honestly makes me wonder.....

Sword, guns can **** you up. but if made right swords can be designed to rip your guts straight out of your navel.

Tell me of a gun that could do that? Thats what I though.

Guns are handy with long range shooting but if you have someone cornered or in a (fair) match Swords would be mcuh better.

Like in the episode of firefly 'Shindig' 😱

someone obviously thinks kill bill is a work of fact...in the time a swordsman could move 3 meters... a gun (MP5) could fire 40 bullets...
(swordsman would take 3 seconds, MP5 fires 800 bullets a min...it would fire 30 bullets norm as its magazine is only 30 rounds...)

Re: More damage : Guns or swords ?

Originally posted by grey fox
Just a little thing that has my curiosity worked to the bone .

Which does more damage a gun or a sword ?

Think about it , a bullet can hit it's target in the arm , and the victim can survive . Yet a well placed sword stroke and suddenly the victim needs an amputation . It honestly makes me wonder.....

Depends on what kind of gun.......

For the fact, I do reject violence, I just happen to know a thing or 2 concerning blades and guns as I practiced using them.
Still with you on the fact that a sword is more practical within the 2 meter range, but just an inch further there is stuff like double 0 shotgun-shells, hollow-point ammo and shit like that.
As I've said, technology made melee redundant.

scientifically...it's a gun...

you stab someone through the stomach with a sword...the area of damage is confined relatively close to where the blade passes through the body...

a bullet, on the other hand, creates a conical shape damage pattern that causes massive damage throughout a huge area of the body

the pictures of someone who has been shot will show a small entry wound..but in the case of something like a 44 magnum...you would have a hole about the size of a phone book for an exit wound

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Guts from Berserk is a cool char...😉
Shame they never really concuded the anime... I'll have to read the manga one day...

He's indeed awesome (the anime is kind of crappy but hey..most animes are) ....get the Manga if youz can it's my favorite.

Originally posted by soleran30
.....................so where is the sword to match Hit or Miss's weapon and the person to carry it🙂
Not a sword.. a DEATH SAW!

Sorry 😮

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Not a sword.. a DEATH SAW!

Sorry 😮

I guess the term "pwned" would apply now, if ever.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
guns are more efficient as its harder to dodge them n they are easier to carry/conceal, and mostly HANDLE, they also have the advantage of range, however as far as wounds that are INFLICTED go, a sword is much MUCH more deadlier than even a 50 caliber gun.

Are you stupid

A shot with a magnum would kill more people in a minute than a sword

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Not a sword.. a DEATH SAW!

Sorry 😮

erm, thas a coal miner, n the thing that looks like a rotating saw blade in the front it actually made up of many large buckets{each blade tooth is actually a bucket seen from sideways} its used in large scale open cast soal mining.

either way, a sword is pwnage, a gun shot may own you but a sword makes you suffer as you die, therefore, i say swords are total pwnage

the thing with a sword is that you have to HIT sum1 with it, n thas hard n dangerous, as compared to a gun, on the other hand, if u DO hit, the damage is worse than any gun.

exactly, total pwnage 😉

guns,
any idiot can use a gun, it takes a lot of skill and fitness to use a sword effectively.

Well on topic, I think a Sword has the chance to damage more than a gun. Guns are more effective though.

Originally posted by Inspectah Deck
Are you stupid

A shot with a magnum would kill more people in a minute than a sword

Exactly. Which is why swords are obsolete, homes.

Ok , so far we have gathered that....

SWORD'S

[list]
[*]Pwn
[*]Can leave your opponent in pain while they die
[*].........and that saw blades rock
[/list]

Whereas

GUN'S

[list]
[*]Kill further then the necessary H2H zone
[*]Don't need much skill
[*]Rip people to shreds if using a automatic
[/list]

Well I was wondering what to compare. One Hit vs oine Bullet or what? I mean there need to be some rules to be fair.

With a sword you can behead an opponent. Much more effective I'll say...

Why is this thread still here 😑 How come it hasn't been filed in the "What's colder: Ice or fire?" department.