Murderer of two sex offenders sentenced to 44 years

Originally posted by Makedde
Well, that sucks! It angers me too when I hear about rapists being set free on bail or Catholic priests released from jail because they 'no longer a danger'. Sometimes the law sucks, but overall, I think America has a more harsh system.

Haha, yes.

What a great world that will be, eh? Keeping people in even though they are no longer a danger. Some people who get released do genuinely go on to live law abiding lives and do no wrong for the rest of theirs.

You hate the law when it is against you and like it when it works for you.

-AC

Originally posted by BackFire
Oh, I don't know about that. Our justice system is pretty terrible sometimes.

A guy who raped a kid recently got sentanced to house arrest for his crime, not a day in prison, just house arrest.

Blew my mind when I heard that.

You're in CA, which is pretty lenient to the point of downright ridiculous, homes.

In the South and Southwest, we're pretty strict and have a lot of follow-through. Hell, in Arizona we still have the gas chamber as a form of execution.

"One difference between California and Texas, is that in Texas, we have the death penalty and we actually use it!"- Comedian, Ron White

In either AZ or TX, I can guarauntee you that OJ, Robert Blake, and Gary Condit wouldve been dead a long time ago. Michael Jackson would be getting raped in the Sate Penn. Our judges arent pussies who let the media make all their decisions.

Judges making their own wrong decisions are almost as bad as the media's influenced "right" ones.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Haha, yes.

What a great world that will be, eh? Keeping people in even though they are no longer a danger. Some people who get released do genuinely go on to live law abiding lives and do no wrong for the rest of theirs.

You hate the law when it is against you and like it when it works for you.

-AC

Not so. Sex offenders considered high risk are released all the time, the Catholic priest I mentioned was set free because he hadn't molested young boys for 20 years. Should he have gone free just because he hadn't touched a child in 20 years? Of course not, he was released because he is Catholic, simple as that.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
You're in CA, which is pretty lenient to the point of downright ridiculous, homes.

In the South and Southwest, we're pretty strict and have a lot of follow-through. Hell, in Arizona we still have the gas chamber as a form of execution.

"One difference between California and Texas, is that in Texas, we have the death penalty and we actually use it!"- Comedian, Ron White

In either AZ or TX, I can guarauntee you that OJ, Robert Blake, and Gary Condit wouldve been dead a long time ago. Michael Jackson would be getting raped in the Sate Penn. Our judges arent pussies who let the media make all their decisions.

I don't believe the case I'm referring to took place in CA.

Texas doesn't use the death penalty, they abuse it. Their overuse of it is the laughing stock of the rest of the country/world.

Whoops, To AC:

Thats IF theyre wrong, homes.

Judges should be judges, not some gossip columnist for the L.A. Times.

If you wanna rape or kill someone and get away with it, just go to Sunny California.

Originally posted by Makedde
Not so. Sex offenders considered high risk are released all the time, the Catholic priest I mentioned was set free because he hadn't molested young boys for 20 years. Should he have gone free just because he hadn't touched a child in 20 years? Of course not, he was released because he is Catholic, simple as that.

Who said that there aren't criminals released that ARE still a danger? I said that there are people released who are deemed a danger no more, and happen to prove that.

The term "Correctional institution" comes because it's designed to correct. Once they believe beyond doubt that this has been achieved, no reason to keep them. Shouldn't do it willy nilly, but you can't keep everyone in.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I don't see why you think death is better, because you apparantly don't think death is better, do you? No. You think molestation is, like any person with a working brain. Which is why you just said you would choose it over death.

Nothing is worse than molestation, to you. To you, death is better. Yet you would choose molestation over death.

Would you be able to live with the fact that you allowed your child to be molested? Would you feel happy to take him to therapy and comfort him at all hours of the night? If he committed suicide would you still feel happy that you made him live a life of misery and pain? I sure wouldn't.

Originally posted by BackFire
Texas doesn't use the death penalty, they abuse it. Their overuse of it is the laughing stock of the rest of the country/world.

Texas is a state that doesnt f*ck around, homes. Dont kill anyone there, and you should be fine.

Originally posted by Makedde
Would you be able to live with the fact that you allowed your child to be molested? Would you feel happy to take him to therapy and comfort him at all hours of the night? If he committed suicide would you still feel happy that you made him live a life of misery and pain? I sure wouldn't.

You spend your time claiming there's nothing worse than molestation, even death is better. Then when confronted with a situation that has you choosing between the two, you chose molestation.

So you obviously don't believe death is better and molestation is the worst thing. You're obviously, like so many people, just saying it because it's "what to do".

Stop pushing the theoretics and hypotheticals. The choice was simple: Your kid gets murder or gets molested, you chose molested.

Once again we see your actions contradict your alleged beliefs.

-AC

All the far-south states between AZ and FL have very similiar death penalty laws. TX and LA are little bit more gung-ho about them, though.

Originally posted by Makedde

Sure, I would love my child, support him and make sure he has a great life, but is that enough? What if my child ends up committing suicide because he can't cope with what happened in his childhood? I'd feel guilty about it, as would any other parent. They might wish they had have allowed the man to kill the child.

Look at what you posit as the ultimate worst-case scenario for the molestation side- suicide.

IE- molestation is terrible, and at worst it might lead to death.

Guess what also leads to death?

Death.

Makadde, are you a parent?

I wouldn't want my child to be molested. Murder is physical pain, molestion is emotional pain. Physical pain can be cured, emotional pain takes a lot longer.

I am trying to understand it from your point of view and I can understand you saying the murder is worse, but I see it differently. I would want to spare my child emotional pain-no child should ever have to be in pain, ever.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Look at what you posit as the ultimate worst-case scenario for the molestation side- suicide.

IE- molestation is terrible, and at worst it might lead to death.

Guess what also leads to death?

Death.

I like this post.

Watch this. No seriously, watch.

Originally posted by Makedde
Logically, you will let your child be molested, but still, that wouldn't be an easy choice to make.

You expressed that if confronted with a choice in which your child can either be murdered or molested, you would choose molested.

Originally posted by Makedde
I wouldn't want my child to be molested. Murder is physical pain, molestion is emotional pain. Physical pain can be cured, emotional pain takes a lot longer.

This is you now saying you wouldn't. The same person who previously said "My opinions never change", despite being the most flip-floppy and hypocritical of all KMC posters.

Originally posted by Makedde
I can understand you saying the murder is worse, but I see it differently. I would want to spare my child emotional pain-no child should ever have to be in pain, ever.

You don't see it differently, because you just said you would let your child be molested. You just chose molestation OVER death, for crying out loud.

What the hell are you talking about now?

-AC

Originally posted by Makedde
I wouldn't want my child to be molested. Murder is physical pain, molestion is emotional pain. Physical pain can be cured, emotional pain takes a lot longer.

I am trying to understand it from your point of view and I can understand you saying the murder is worse, but I see it differently. I would want to spare my child emotional pain-no child should ever have to be in pain, ever.

So why have kids? Don't bring them into the world.

I think you're living in the clouds with that.

PS- Assault is physical pain.

Murder is...death.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Makadde, are you a parent?

No, but I often look after my neighbours little children. I would never be able to live with myself if I allowed them to be violated in such a way. To me, molesting them would be worse than killing them. But that's just my view, I shouldn't vilified for it.

Originally posted by Makedde
To me, molesting them would be worse than killing them. But that's just my view, I shouldn't vilified for it.

Well then WHY the f*ck did you just say "Logically, you will let your kid get molested" and agree with it?

Such an idiot.

-AC

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Texas is a state that doesnt f*ck around, homes. Dont kill anyone there, and you should be fine.

Tell that to the innocent folks who have been put to death because of Texas' itchy trigger finger.

AC: Watch the insults and attacks.