Murderer of two sex offenders sentenced to 44 years

Originally posted by Makedde
I don't care if murderes or rapists won't overcome eternal death. IMO, they deserve to be dead, the sick bastards who prey on children.

And maybe some people can overcome the worst kinds of sexual abuse, but a lot of them can't, and never will. It's a huge slap in the face for those people who went through years of horrific abuse, only to have the man who molested them released from prison, despite the high risk of them again reoffending.

It's also a huge slap in the face when people who aren't even invested in the situation in any way declare that victims of sexual abuse might as well go and kill themselves, because that is preferable to the life they now have ahead of them.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I would like to pose the following question to those who are arguing that murder is justified if the victim is a bad person: Is it okay to rape someone if she is a bad person?

Give them enough rope, and all that.

Good work.

LOL what the hell is eternal death is someone's belief system defining death as well lol..............................

Homicide in the US legal system is illegal
Rape in the US legal system is Illegal

homicide of a rapist in the US legal system is still Illegal...........regardless of the crimes of the victim. No need to mystify of glorify the persons descision to take action into their own hands.

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Why bother looking for solutions! Why not kill all your problems away!
Anyone whos not perfect should be shot before they do something wrong, That way we won't have to bother trying to help these defective persons before they make a mistake!

That can be apllied to the killer as well. Why kill(or arrest) him, if by not being perfect he killed two sex offenders.

What about death sentece ? It is in any way different than what he did... killed the sex offenders ? Why the state can kill people, if he can´t ?

It would be interesting if the guy killed a criminal who was supposed to receive death penalty.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
That can be apllied to the killer as well. Why kill(or arrest) him, if by not being perfect he killed two sex offenders.

People seem to overlook the very possible idea that this nutcase decided to commit murder, then thought "Wait, if I kill two OTHER criminals, people will back me because they think I'm doing a service."

All he has to do is say that and there you go, support of idiots.

Too dumb, the opinions in this thread. "Let's support a double murderer." "Why?" "Killed two sex offenders."

Originally posted by Atlantis001
What about death sentece ? It is in any way different than what he did... killed the sex offenders ? Why the state can kill people, if he can´t ?

It would be interesting if the guy killed a criminal who was supposed to receive death penalty.

Regardless of whether I agree with the death penalty or not, that's their job. An extremely pointless and hypocritical one, but their job. It doesn't mean people can now go around committing murder because they feel they are doing the world a service.

It's rationale like that which will leave us with a WORSE world.

-AC

Originally posted by Atlantis001
What about death sentece ? It is in any way different than what he did... killed the sex offenders ? Why the state can kill people, if he can´t ?

It would be interesting if the guy killed a criminal who was supposed to receive death penalty.

The State is allowed to lock up people...why isn't any citizen? Oh yeah, cause that'S what the State is for, protect it'S people from people that lock them up.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
People seem to overlook the very possible idea that this nutcase decided to commit murder, then thought "Wait, if I kill two OTHER criminals, people will back me because they think I'm doing a service."

All he has to do is say that and there you go, support of idiots.

Too dumb, the opinions in this thread. "Let's support a double murderer." "Why?" "Killed two sex offenders."

I never implied nothing of that in my post.

I´m saying that if "Anyone whos not perfect should be shot" is true, it can be applied to the killer as well, but I´m not agreeing that is true.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri

Would I feel safer around someone I knew would sexually molest me, but let me go, or some shotgun wielding, execution-happy, drug-addicted maniac?

-AC

But see the difference is the sexual offender is probably raping you without bias. Maybe it's because she or he thinks you are cute or because you are vulnerable. The shotgun wielding maniac is going to kill you because you did something to warrant a violent response.

Personally I wouldn't want to be araound either, but if I had to choose I'd choose the person who'd look out for my safety.

Originally posted by Bardock42
The State is allowed to lock up people...why isn't any citizen? Oh yeah, cause that'S what the State is for, protect it'S people from people that lock them up.

What makes the state more capable of deciding the right and wrong better than any citizen ?

Originally posted by meep-meep
But see the difference is the sexual offender is probably raping you without bias. Maybe it's because she or he thinks you are cute or because you are vulnerable. The shotgun wielding maniac is going to kill you because you did something to warrant a violent response.

Personally I wouldn't want to be araound either, but if I had to choose I'd choose the person who'd look out for my safety.

Safety? You'd place your life in the hands of a shotgun wielding psychopath who's quite clearly off his shopping cart? Idiotic. Saying that, it's coming from the person who claimed it's ok to be raped if you're a bad person. I'm beginning to be more secure in my belief that KMC's collective logic has gone off the wagon.

When did it become ok to herald murderers as good, heroic people? Why are people kneejerking and backing this killer just because of WHO he killed? If you're not going to complain he killed them, fine, but let's not get into it being a GOOD thing that people like him exist.

He's a nutcase who commits execution style murders. Why is it even being debated as to what's worse?

Killing someone forever is worse than fondling a kid's genitalia and letting them live. Shall we stop the bullshit pretense here?

I will ask again, would you rather have your kid murdered or molested?

Originally posted by Atlantis001
What makes the state more capable of deciding the right and wrong better than any citizen ?

Nobody is saying the state or government are more capable of DECIDING what's right or wrong, everyone does that for themselves.

It's the acting upon it that is not allowed. To even suggest that what this lunatic did, was good, is disgusting.

-AC

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Basically, you believe that is okay to rape someone if she is a bad enough person. Disgusting.

I appreciate the way you summarized my analysis of the situation and flipped it around to make me look like a a horrible person. You are quite talented.

If some person killed or raped my brother, mother or sister unjustifiably and I knew where they lived and who they were I'd probably have a hard time letting somebody else deal out the punsihment. But it is important to let the system decide whether or not the person is guilty. I probably wouldn't just attempt to murder somebody due to my emotions at the time. What if the person didn't do it? That is why it is important to bring this person into court and blah, blah blah.

The situation here is that the man killed convicted pedophiles who molested someone else's children. Maybe what he did is insane, maybe what he did was altruistic. Whatever the case I'm not devasted.

Originally posted by meep-meep
I'd probably have a hard time letting somebody else deal out the punsihment.

Why? Because it's none of their business is it?

Hence why this guy is a dangerous nutcase who probably would have murdered anyway. He had nothing to do with the guys he murdered, the victims or their families, but he did it anyway.

-AC

Originally posted by Atlantis001
What makes the state more capable of deciding the right and wrong better than any citizen ?

It got it's power from all citizens. In return it creates a safe environment. Certainly every citizen has the right to fight against it orr even revolt...but the state has the right to defend itself as well, in the name of it's citizens.

Lets see if Californias sex offender laws go into effect🙂 LOL they put a satellite tracker on your ass 4 ever! Nice......................lol if that law ever goes into effect put all sex offenders on California that would suck.

Ok now back to disputing legallity and heroism of a murderer I mean hero

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why? Because it's none of their business is it?

Hence why this guy is a dangerous nutcase who probably would have murdered anyway. He had nothing to do with the guys he murdered, the victims or their families, but he did it anyway.

-AC

Why? Because somebody did something horrible to someone in my "circle of trust." Sorry about that. Anyway, my emotions and my logic would be in a struggle if something like this were to happen. But as I pointed out I'd probably just let the system in place take its course and I'd let it all play out in court. It's important to understand the neccesity of this. But that is beside the point because the actual topic was nothing to do with the man killing on behalf of his children.

Maybe the guy, Mullen, would have murdered someone regardless, but again I'm not sad because he decided to murder2 pedophiles and not 2 slightly more socially acceptable people.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why? Because it's none of their business is it?

Hence why this guy is a dangerous nutcase who probably would have murdered anyway. He had nothing to do with the guys he murdered, the victims or their families, but he did it anyway.

Maybe we should ask the families what they think of the person who killed the guy who have molested their child ?

Originally posted by Bardock42
It got it's power from all citizens. In return it creates a safe environment. Certainly every citizen has the right to fight against it orr even revolt...but the state has the right to defend itself as well, in the name of it's citizens.

Yes, I agree with it in part, but I don´t believe that the state decisions can be justified because it is bigger than one citizen. I think that the only think that "justify" the state decisions is power, one citizen cannot deal with the state directly because he is weaker than the state. A citizen don´t have armies, and police, and the state have.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
Maybe we should ask the families what they think of the person who killed the guy who have molested their child ?

Yes, I agree with it in part, but I don´t believe that the state decisions can be justified because it is bigger than one citizen. I think that the only think that "justify" the state decisions is power, one citizen cannot deal with the state directly because he is weaker than the state. A citizen don´t have armies, and police, and the state have.

Well, that is why our State made itself open to public....it'S not a dictatorship...it might be corrupted but that's another discussion then.

And teh State only has power because of it'S citizens. Everyone supporting it gives it the power.
If you feel this man is right do something about it. Try to run for an office, try to find people that think alike....maybe it'S time for a revolution. But understand that the state as it is needs to stick to it'S laws...

Or...let's just all become heroes. Killings for sex attacks.

Sex attacks for assaults. Assaults for littering. And so on.

Sounds like a great, heroic, safe society.

Originally posted by meep-meep
Maybe the guy, Mullen, would have murdered someone regardless, but again I'm not sad because he decided to murder2 pedophiles and not 2 slightly more socially acceptable people.

Disgraceful logic. Socially acceptable? Some of the bands I listen to aren't socially acceptable. Does it mean their deaths would be better than two regular people, despite them contributing more to the world than said regulars?

Exactly, think before you speak.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
Maybe we should ask the families what they think of the person who killed the guy who have molested their child ?

You'll find many different answers. Some will say they're glad, some will say they don't care, some will undoubtedly say they wanted them in jail instead.

You're missing the fact that people don't act in the most sensible of ways when they are biased or working under the emotional influence. Mullen was wrong and so are you for supporting him.

-AC