Originally posted by Revolver Ocelot
I don't see whats the big fuss about this 'Marka Ragnos' character. He was mentioned in the foot note of a single comic series and never really did much of significance, besides rule his relatively small Empire of sith for 100 years. Oh, and he was the uberdbzstrongest, therefore he's worth a damn [/sarcasm]
Yes because being described as the most powerful of the most powerful. Having a terryfing grasp of the Dark Side, immense strength both physical and in the force and of course being undefeated for more then a 100 years and dying a natural death in a society that always has the strongest rule is unimpressive.
Hell that alone is very impressive, now add the fact that we know what Sadow could do. Just the remnants of Sadow his knowledge made people like Kun and Nadd godlike, Sadow created a ship that could blow up stars, and guess what he could do it himself, Sadow has created illusionary army's that were as good as real, that could kill be killed and even destroy buildings. And he didn't create small groups he created millions upon millions of troops, more then enough to attack three planets, at the same time.
That alone shows a far greater control then that of anybody else ever, you won't find anybody that has that kind of power, and Ragnos was above Sadow... Far above Sadow.
Originally posted by skyflyer
It is up to you to begin as it is you who has something to prove. I will counter what you say. Or are you intimidated. And Woot, Nai and IKC, feel free to join in. Wesker, Sorgo or Faunus, don't even bother as tehre is nothing that you can contribute that these guys can't.
LMAO, copout.
You challenge me to the Ragnos thread, and then I "have something to prove."
What I want to prove is that you establish you lack logic, reasoning, and understanding every time you open your mouth. You're proving that just by spewing garbage like this.
So make my day, throw an argument out there... if you even can.
We're starting this debate from scratch. So as it stands there is no proof for Ragnos, or against Ragnos. That means that currently, there is no proof for Ragnos being the most powerful, and so I have nothing to prove at the moment as my whole point is that there is nothing to say that Ragnos is the most powerful. Therefor it is up to you to tip the scales in favour of Ragnos.
Originally posted by skyflyer
We're starting this debate from scratch. So as it stands there is no proof for Ragnos, or against Ragnos. That means that currently, there is no proof for Ragnos being the most powerful, and so I have nothing to prove at the moment as my whole point is that there is nothing to say that Ragnos is the most powerful. Therefor it is up to you to tip the scales in favour of Ragnos.
What kind of bullshit excuse is that? You challenged me to this thread. You're the plaintiff, you're the challenger, the underdog, you make the first move. Burden of proof is with you, buddy.
And simply because it's "starting from scratch" (since when?) doesn't give you the excuse of being ignorant and unreceptive towards all the prior logical inferences.
You claim that the ancient sith are godlike. Yet we only ever see one that displays godlike feats - Sadow. We also see a bunch of great sith lords get slaughtered by Massasi. There are exceptional beings in all races. Look at Sion and Luke. Both humans and as powerful as Sadow. Does that make the humans a godlike race. Challenge me on any of these points and I will completely back them up.