Marka Ragnos

Started by zod36012 pages

Originally posted by Fishy
No actually I wouldn't say that... Sylvar had the initiative, she had a body build for fighting, she had sharp claws and anger, besides she did have her lightsaber, the fact that she didn't use it just shows that she was a great fighter without it, otherwise she wuold have used it.

Also show the Massassi didn't have any weapons, and even if they didn't they were still strong and they still had sharp claws, they could have just jumped on the sith Lords and cut them down by jumping at him with a dozen man at the same time... Being ambushed no matter by who always puts you at a huge disadvantage...

No. Wrong again Fishy. She didn't use her lightsaber because she lost control.

I have already explained how they were not completely caught by surprise and seeing as the fact that you do not even have the comics, your word doesn't mean shit. Before you continue to argue incorrectly, why don't you visit SWCOMICS.COM. The sith lords were not even piloting the ship. They were just sitting back relaxed and peacefully to watch how the battle would play out. They clearly had time to react and even had time to say a few things. And then you see these Massasi SLAVES easily grab hold of one of one of these sith of "IMMENSE PHYSICAL STRENGTH".

Actually I have the comics around here somewhere been a long time since I last read them though and I do visit SWcomics.com I've read them all, so my word means as much as yours if not more since I'm nto an idiot that makes absurd claims without prove.

Now instead of asking me to do your research look it up yourself and show the damn pic. The Sith Lords were fighting a battle and that takes time, energy, and concentration. Its not something you do while drinking a relaxing beer and watching a sport game. They were bussy. And they were ambushed by Massassi who like the Sith Lords posses immense physical strength seeing as they are part of the same race.

No. Wrong again Fishy. She didn't use her lightsaber because she lost control.

Don't be stupid, she used her lightsaber in redemption when she lost control. She didn't use her lightsaber because she didn't need too. Besides nobody not she nor the narrator claimed that it was because she lost control, therefor she didn't lose control unless you can show she did. And you are unable to do that.

No she losy control in Redemption while she was already using her saber. In TSW, she loses control and instead of reaching down for her saber, she loses control and forgets about it and just scratches the hell out of them like she did to Exar Kun originally and like she later did to Crado.

And no it is up to you to find the comics and not up to me to show you the scan (not that I would be able to do anyway). And your point of view does mean shit because you read the comics so long ago that you are talking utter rubbish.

Originally posted by zod360
And no it is up to you to find the comics and not up to me to show you the scan (not that I would be able to do anyway). And your point of view does mean shit because you read the comics so long ago that you are talking utter rubbish.

I read the comics online just a week or two three ago. Stop making stupid assumptions.

And actually it is up to you to prove it, afterall you are making the statement, prove its true. Go ahead just go to swcomics.com read the comics and copy the links for the comic we need... Its not that hard to do, but i'm definitly not going to do it for you.

And again prove Sylvar was so blinded by rage that she couldn't use her lightsaber anymore, she was certainly well enough to talk and to act and to challenge Exar, perhaps angry but she was not so blinded by her rage that she lost all control of her body or her mind, she would have used her lightsaber if that would have given her an advantage, obviously she did not believe it did.

You tell yourself that. This is a sign of someone who has lost an argument. You're making any desperate attempt that you can.

Originally posted by zod360
You tell yourself that. This is a sign of someone who has lost an argument. You're making any desperate attempt that you can.

Hmm what? Numan ask anybody but yourself and you would see that you are the one thats losing the argument because you ignore points, refuse to give prove and accept your own opinion as fact.

But thanks for not replying once again, it just shows you can't. So once again its proven Logic > Numan and Ragnos > Every other force user ever.

And you base that on me not replying to one point in which I would have proven wrong by giving the same answer I have already done 100 times. And people here seem to dislike me anyway so even if I was the best debater in the world, they would still do the same.

Originally posted by zod360
And you base that on me not replying to one point in which I would have proven wrong by giving the same answer I have already done 100 times. And people here seem to dislike me anyway so even if I was the best debater in the world, they would still do the same.

No, I base that on the fact that you haven't once provided a source or images of whatever you claim. You claim and then say its true, without evidence. Without using any logic, the greatest debator in the world would have prove, he would have common sense, and he would know how to use logic.

You lack all those things, thats why we don't like you, that and you are unable to admit to all of those things but instead claim that everybody else, many times with far higher educations people twice your age, who spend a lot more time studying reading whatever are wrong. Based on nothing but your own opinion that is of course not supported by facts, and without given any kind of prove. And instead of just debatting and giving prove, you keep on saying you already did when you didn't and refuse to answer posts. Saying the others lost and you just don't feel like continuing..

There is a reason we don't like you Numan, there is a reason debates with you are useless, and that is it.

Right and because of the fact that my scanner is broken and I cannot show you that what I am saying is true (and considering you read them 2 weeks ago, you should be able to remember them), I am automatically a bad debater and don't use logic or show evidence. You're really quite dumb if that is what you are basing your point of view that I am dumb on. And you don't like me because of the Tulak versus Yoda thread.

And if my debates are so useless, then why are you still replying to what I have said. I would have thought that you would have just left if the debate was that useless.

Right and because of the fact that my scanner is broken and I cannot show you that what I am saying is true (and considering you read them 2 weeks ago, you should be able to remember them), I am automatically a bad debater and don't use logic or show evidence. You're really quite dumb if that is what you are basing your point of view that I am dumb on. And you don't like me because of the Tulak versus Yoda thread.

No thats not the reason I don't like you, although the thread does show perfectly what kind of an idiot you are... And you know about SWcomics.com you should be able to look it up online and give me a link now shouldn't you? but you don't, you refuse to do so. you refuse to give us the quotes or the context about the quotes, you just state things without prove and we have no reason to believe you.

There are plenty of other reasons but your just going to ignore that.

And if my debates are so useless, then why are you still replying to what I have said. I would have thought that you would have just left if the debate was that useless.

Oh don't worry i'm leaving this debate now, seeing as you are unable to reply to my posts and unable to give prove, I just continued as long as I did, because I was bored... You do stupid things when your bored.

I can't give you the exact links but the thing with Sylvar happened shortly before Kun slayed Bass. And I think the Massasi killing the sith lords happened in the final issue of TGAOTS. And you don't have to leave. Just state the exact things that you want me to reply to (1 at a time preferably).

Fishy, why waste your time with him?

Boredom I guess... But even I am not bored enough to continue this...

Why are you acting as if I am the bad guy here. Wesker, Woot and Illustrious have been way more out of order then I have and I have not been any worse then you Fishy.

Those guys might be stubborn as hell at times, but at least they use logic know logic when it hits them in the face and accept prove and give it themselves..

When I see logic I accept it. I eventually accepted that lightsabers are not more powerful then sith swords and that I was not distinguishing between power and cutting power.

wow. could you make it any more obvious?

I don't see whats the big fuss about this 'Marka Ragnos' character. He was mentioned in the foot note of a single comic series and never really did much of significance, besides rule his relatively small Empire of sith for 100 years. Oh, and he was the uberdbzstrongest, therefore he's worth a damn [/sarcasm]