Originally posted by GalacticStormWhat recent sources is my interpretation not supported by?
You are providing on panel evidence but it does NOT conclusively support your interpretation. We have interpreted said evidence differently. You cannot treat your interpretation as fact, especially when your interpretation is NOT supported by recent sources.The basis for your argument is your interpretation of the ambiguous issue 4 and the fact that the title remained "Spectre" after Hal got rid of the Wrath. That is soooo poor 😂
Especially when it was established that Hal had become a Spectre of a different nature having bypassed the Wrath and dealt with the Logos directly.
The Spectre of Vol 4 = Hal + a connection to the Logos
It does NOT = Hal+Logos
The Logos is an aspect of God. It is the Word of God. It is not a costumed superhero 😂