Jacen/Jaina Solo and Kyp Durron vs Exar Kun and Ulic Qel Droma

Originally posted by tdtd
Which is it IKC, up in the air, either way, or you never saying Kun could outright defeat Ragnos? Get your thoughts in order.

Your assertion (that I stated that Kun could take Ragnos) is both in factual error and ad hominem tu quoque, a logical fallacy.

What does either way mean to you? That Ragnos could take Kun and vice versa? Don't play stupid because you're denying your own quotes...

Saying the outcome is up in the air (which is the same as saying it could go either way) does not mean that I think Kun could take Ragnos. Your ad hominem tu quoque attempt to put words in my mouth is both a logical fallacy and downright false.

Originally posted by tdtd
Thanks for proving my point, Kun fanboy.. Can we say hypocrite?

Can we say "tdtd is clueless on the irony of the situation?"

What's the matter? I call people fanboys as much as you call other people fan boys with the same basis, but somehow I'm clueless? Way to understand the big picture.

Originally posted by IKC
Saying the outcome is up in the air (which is the same as saying it could go either way) does not mean that I think Kun could take Ragnos. Your ad hominem tu quoque attempt to put words in my mouth is both a logical fallacy and downright false.

You're right, not directly. However either way means either one could take it which also means that you think Kun could take Ragnos. Are you not understanding?

Originally posted by tdtd
You're right, not directly. However either way means either one could take it which also means that you think Kun could take Ragnos. Are you not understanding?

No, apparently you aren't. It's another way of saying that I can't know for sure. Putting words in my mouth in a piss-poor attempt at ad hominem tu quoque isn't going to work, troll.

You're right, up in the air means you're not sure... However "either way" implies that either can win, not that youre not sure... Way to understand the meaning your own text... Calling me a troll doesn't make it true🙂

You're right, up in the air means you're not sure... However "either way" implies that either can win, not that youre not sure... Way to understand the meaning your own text...

It's another way of saying that I can't know for sure. Putting words in my mouth in a piss-poor attempt at ad hominem tu quoque isn't going to work, troll.

Calling me a troll doesn't make it true

Your posts are all the evidence I need.

What's that, you make a claim and provide what you call 'evidence', so it's true? Hmmmm sounds familiar.... Oh wait, when I do it it's a logical fallacy.. What a way to live in a dream world.

What's that, you make a claim and provide what you call 'evidence', so it's true?

Evidence must be relevant and reasonably applied.

Oh wait, when I do it it's a logical fallacy..

That would require you to do it. You don't.

Ah so when I claim that youre dodging a question and provide proof for it, in your mind it's irrelevant. You lose the debate as soon as you start lying to yourself IKC..

Originally posted by tdtd
What's the matter? I call people fanboys as much as you call other people fan boys with the same basis, but somehow I'm clueless? Way to understand the big picture.

Same basis? tdtd, I've already gone over this with you many many times.

You- antagonistic ignoramus who provides no logical arguments and attacks those who do. You hold a clear and evident bias for characters, but you do not do any arguing or proving up yourself. You ride on other fanboys and take their ideas while pissing and moaning at the opposition.

People you call fanboys- provide proof, use logic, provice excellent arguments, and review and KNOW the source material.

Same basis my ass, tdtd. Congrats, here's your sign:

Originally posted by Wesker
Same basis? tdtd, I've already gone over this with you many many times.

You- antagonistic ignoramus who provides no logical arguments and attacks those who do. You hold a clear and evident bias for characters, but you do not do any arguing or proving up yourself. You ride on other fanboys and take their ideas while pissing and moaning at the opposition.

People you can fanboys- provide proof, use logic, provice excellent arguments, and review and KNOW the source material.

Same basis my ass, tdtd. Congrats, here's your sign:

I'm a retard? That would make you what? A biased nerd?

Btw, show me where I don't ever support Kun, or ever put down Luke? Research your shit before making false statements.

So anyone that supports Luke is a fanboy? What does that make you in regards to Kun

Originally posted by Wesker
Same basis? tdtd, I've already gone over this with you many many times.

You- antagonistic ignoramus who provides no logical arguments and attacks those who do. You hold a clear and evident bias for characters, but you do not do any arguing or proving up yourself. You ride on other fanboys and take their ideas while pissing and moaning at the opposition.

People you call fanboys- provide proof, use logic, provice excellent arguments, and review and KNOW the source material.

Same basis my ass, tdtd. Congrats, here's your sign:

Hey I love that guy! Bob Ross was an excellent artist.

A biased nerd?

I like being called a nerd by a guy with several hundred more posts than me in this subforum alone.

False statements=logical fallacy.. Research your stupidity before you spew it out.

And I was to Janus who makes more hypocritical statements than you

research my shit? Please. You don't even have source material to cite for your cocked up excuse for an argument. Don't pretend to be the mature and intelligent one here, troll.

False statements=logical fallacy.. Research your stupidity before you spew it out.

My post count (all of which save for perhaps two are in this subforum): 1113

Yours: 1823

QED.