Wow. She had access to knowledge and apparently never used that access. Then "more valuable knowledge" ? You have data from the age of the start of the Jedi Order on in the Jedi Temple on Coruscant and the Jedi Archieves also basically remained intact from that time on. So where was the "more valueable knowledge" lost ? Ossus ? You want to tell me that virtually every knowledge stored on Ossus was lost by destroying Ossus - then nobody did ever learned that knowledge or passed it on ? Argumentum ad absurdum.
Oh, she never used that knowledge? That's why she was hanging out with Odan-Urr, the oldest Jedi Master we can name, during the Sith War, right? That's why he taught her the useful technique of blinding someone to the Force, right?
Yes, you can have "data" from the start of the Jedi Order on Coruscant. So what comprises this mysterious "data," Nai? May I ask how that data remained "intact" during the first rule of the Sith, a thousand years before the PT?
Oh, wait. I guess it couldn't.
Maybe you should read the comics next time. Narration and dialogue indicate that the best efforts of the Jedi to rescue the knowledge stored before the supernovae impact weren't enough.
"A thousand years of Jedi history must be packed and rescued in only a few hours. They have no time to sort or sift out the most precious items. They must take everything, and hurry... and hope." - Narrator
"The hopeless preparations have a devastating effect on those Jedi who must witness the evacuation." - Narrator
Then of course there's this:
"The emergency efforts of all the Jedi can barely scratch the surface of the knowledge entombed on Ossus." -Narrator
"Not enough. Given an entire year we could not have salvaged enough. The rest will be lost forever." - Tott Doneeta
I hope I've made it glaringly obvious even to you, Nai. Most if not all of the valuable knowledge stored on Ossus was destroyed in the shockwave of the ten supernovae that consumed the planet.
Q. E. D.
Ah...that's why the Brotherhood of Darkness was founded by a Rogue Jedi that stole "one of the Sith holocrons" from the Jedi temple. Because they did only have one ?
Reading comprehension is your friend. I like how you can quote my post but not read it.
Oh, and the PT Jedi only had one Sith holocron, which they couldn't even access.
Pre-BOD Jedi are not the PT Jedi.
QED.
Yes. And this is an assumption which can only be based on the assumptions that:
Wrong, you're making a strawman argument again. It is an assumption based on Kun's known capabilities at that point in time and has little to nothing to do with Vodo.
And what "martial time" are you talking about ? The only "Sith" that has shown up in 1000 years before TOTJ was Nadd. And the only conflict we see is a six months war with some few battles. Sorry...but virtually every "major" PT Jedi has more combat and lightsaber vs lightsaber experience than the people appearing in TOTJ.
Not a martial time, huh? I guess that's why I have these:
Not a martial time, huh? I guess the Battle of Basilisk referenced here by the omniscient narrator never happened.
Not a martial time, huh? Why, then, is Qrrrl Toq a "fearless warrior?" Why does he construct Jedi armor if it's not a martial time?
Not a martial time, huh? I guess then that the Vultar Cataclysm and Gank Massacres referenced here didn't happen either!
Not a martial time, huh? I guess the Great Droid Revolution referenced here didn't happen either!
This isn't Star Wars According to Nai. You have been proven wrong. Sit down.
QED.
Nice bunch of wrong premises in your first post (see above). Boring. Next.
It's not my fault that your attention span is apparently deficient and it doesn't allow you to read the relevant sections of a relatively short thread. Vodo can beat Yoda, we have established it in said thread.
Yes. He was a master swordsmen - even before starting his Jedi training. What makes you think he's essentially much weaker as a duellist because he didn't have his force connection any longer ? There are some people who are able to give Jedi trouble in melee combat without being force users (e.g. Echani and Mandalorians). Being able to defeat a Jedi (with unknown duelling skill) in a lightsaber duel who doesn't use his force powers against you doesn't make you the lightsaber god.
By this logic, everyone and their grandmother could use lightsabers against Jedi with great effect.
So, all of a sudden because Nai says so, there's no benefit to having the Force in a lightsaber fight? I guess that precognition wasn't worth much anyway, right? How about that increased speed and strength that one can only achieve by using the Force? Didn't help much?
Pfft. Nice assertion. Groundless, and absurd in the context of the Star Wars mythos, but nice.
He doesn't ? What do you call throwing a lightsaber through a clones chest, knocking Sidious guards off, force push Sidious across the room, throw a pod at him, redirect Dooku's force lightning at Dooku then ? No attacks ? Please...
By this logic, he must have been able to conjure his own lightning and he must have been Force gripping people left and right while off-camera.
The point remains: he doesn't use offensive Force powers against his opponents. He's not going to pull a lightning bolt out of his ass and chuck it at Ulic.
Oh yes. The badass Jedi tapping into the Dark Side who obviously wasn't intelligent enough to crush Ulic with the force (since he couldn't defend against it) but instead went to challenge one of the top duellists of the era with a lightsaber. Very impressive.
Sylvar was tapping into the Dark Side inasmuch as she flew into a rage and assaulted him with her lightsaber. Your point that she "wasn't intelligent enough" to attack him with the Force is moot and irrelevant. The question is Ulic's skills with a lightsaber, which are proven out to be incredible given how he handled Sylvar.
So you again have a situation in which both opponents can gain an advantage via lightsaber combat but one (Yoda) is the superior force user. Who will win ? And if you advice people to read your posts properly please do the same. I did write "a group of Wookies with one of them carrying Yoda on his back" and not "Yoda will pwn Aleema and Ulic alone".
Yoda is the superior Force user? Based on what evidence? His Force push? His ability to hop around? I'd like you to actually establish your points with reasoning rather than just asserting them on the basis of nothing whatsoever.
The Wookies are going to be crippled by Aleema's illusions, given how prone to superstition they are. Ulic's tactical skills are nothing to sneeze at, either. The Krath win more often than not.