Marka Ragnos runs the Gauntlet

Started by tdtd7 pages

No Numan, he is labeled as the most powerful of the most powerful period, but with your logic, it means the exact the same thing because the Sith during the golden age WERE the greatest, and they were godlike. Who doesn't have titanic force powers? Everyone outside if the ancient sith and maybe, MAYBE DN Luke.

Duz! Plo Koon had titanic force powers... he could freez creeks!

Proof it was the most powerful period. I'd like a quote to this godlike bull, too

Google it again numbnuts. The Golden Age of the Sith described the sith as Godlike and at the peak of their power in terms of sith magic.

Prove it. Scan please. And I want something saying of all time, nothing referring to that period and that period alone. 'Of all time,' 'ever', 'in history.'

Again, the Golden Age of the Sith had Godlike warriors, and Ragnos was the dominant and absolute ruler of these people. We know very little of what was before the Golden Age, but we know what the Golden Age constitutes. Ragnos was the most powerful of the most powerful, so you have nothing to contradict that.

I want quotes that say they were godlike, because in DE Palpatine is called a divinity.

And in DE, which was written in 92, it's as if the Sith have only been alive for 1-2,000 years I forget which, which was obviously disproved when TOTJ came out.

Actually it was a supplement to DE written in 2005...and by the way, DE established the Sith as around for Millenia and actually created Ulic Qel-Droma

Right, and unless you have proof that any of that is more canon than KJA, the fact remains that the sith have been alive for at least 10,000 years.

Umm...KJA co-wrote it?

And the Sith species is only a hundred millenia old. The empire is two thousand years old. Confirmed by Leland Chee, organizer and official on LFL canon policies and continuity

I posted this a while back in the Marka Ragnos thread and I think that it accurately explains how Ragnos and the ancient sith really wouldn't be too great in a 1 on 1 battle.

"How do you really think Ragnos would even defeat someone like Yoda. He wouldn't be able to crush him with the force like you have already said. Think back to the book Shadow Hunter when Darsha Assant (I think that's her name) mentions that her master used to force throw boulders with ease, yet struggled to lift up pebbles. The sith magics were clearly able to amplify the FORCE POWER of the user to perform extremely distructive powers such as blowing up stars, but FORCE CONTROL is vital for performing destructive force powers in a small scale, and seeing as there is no evidence of the sith having great control over the force and no evidence that the sith magics amplifying that aspect of the force, I am inclined to believe that the ancient sith would be able to do anything special in a 1 on 1 battle. The fact that the most powerful sith magic that can be used in small fights was Kun's amulet kind of helps my point. It also explains why Naga Sadow resorted to a swordfight with Ludo Kressh when he wanted to be the dark lord. Yet when he was in his ship, he used his destructive sith magic."

LOL... Nice logic Numan. Except nobody would be able to stand up to the ancient sith. And KJA is as canon if not more than your NEC.

Well, considering HE HELPED WRITE IT!

What's your point? And the author of NEC didn't write KJA NOR HELPED! That means KJA did more!

....KJA co-wrote the NEC, you're trying to say it's more canon than him, that's paradoxical

Ok and as Janus said, the author NEC has no knowledge of TOTJ, so he would essentially be throwing his opinion in without knowledge.

He...only wrote the NEC with the man-do you even KNOW what a Co-Author IS?!- who created and wrote TOTJ's story

What is your point, KJA co wrote NEC, and was the only author of TOTJ..

Actually, tom Veitch and another guy co-wrote TOTJ, too