OT Emperor & OT Vader vs Old Ben Kenobi & OT Yoda.

Started by Janus Marius7 pages

Originally posted by Motoko Kusanagi
At first, I would've said DS was right (actually I did), but Janus you've made me see the light ( 😛 ).

The "during this point", could just be referring to character's we've seen up to the actual quote, and of course, Obi-Wan would be the strongest out of the ones we've seen appear.

Lucas doesn't need to make canon statements in his every word about the entire Star Wars universe, and you can't give the "without a doubt is what he meant" when there is still a probability that his quote was only referring to those who we see appear up to that point in the movie, who were of course "good guys".

Yep. You have seen the light! People can't make 100% binding statements on canon by taking severe liberties and taking things horribly out of context.

WTF? The ANH AC states Vader to be like the King of the Universe in ESB, and since King of the Universe>>>>>>>> Emperor of the Galaxy, Vader >>> Palpatine qed

lmao

Originally posted by Janus Marius
If you think I said I could override GL, you need to learn how to READ and COMPREHEND. But I don't think you can, DS. You regularly argue out of your ass.

I provide a quote from GL and you say he's wrong. Is this the best you can do?
Again, because Yoda was not yet created

tdtd, we know he was created before 1980, since ESB came out in 1980. Which came first, 1980 or 2004?
No, you DIDN'T read what I posted. Because I said explicitly that GL may very well have NOT included Yoda in his generalization. What you fail to realize (And apparently , a few others) is that GL is not looking to establish absolute canon with his every word. A director's commentary is not scripted or preplanned, and when he's talking, he's ... -gasp!- discussing the movie and scene at hand. Yoda is not in ANH. He's not even referenced. GL does not include him in his statement, despite Darthsith's literal and anal assertion that he does.

So your assuming Gl forgot about Yoda? Well, until he says "Whoops, I forgot about Yoda." his word is canon. And wow, another insult, why am I not surprised.
If you DO take Gl literally, then you'd say that Vader = 80% of Sidious.

And this comes from the man who made an entire thread about Glentract saying the movies were more official than GL.
And the entire point is that for Obi-Wan to be "stronger" than Yoda, he must be "stronger" in all aspects- this INCLUDES A< B if A = C and C < B arguments. And it's not a small difference in power either... it's the difference between Obi-Wan who was on the backs of his heels trying not to get tooled by Anakin, who got destroyed by Dooku...

Why would he have to be stronger in all aspects? Sidious is stronger than Dooku, right, but not in all aspects. Dooku's the better duelier. He's still stronger. And no one ever said ROTS Obi-Wan is stronger than ROTS Yoda. Alot happened in 19 years.
The "during this point", could just be referring to character's we've seen up to the actual quote, and of course, Obi-Wan would be the strongest out of the ones we've seen appear.

The word "film" was not used. Strongers "at this point in the film." was not used, just "at this point." he wasn't refrencing the movie but the whole of Star Wars.

If another GL quote contradicts the ANH one then possibly the ANh one is an error. If not, GL's the absolute highest source of canon. There's no arguing against GL's word. For the record, it's not like I wish for Obi-Wan to be stronger. GL said it, though, so it's official. Get over it.

The whole point of the AC is to comment on the movie (ANH), not the entirety of Star Wars.

Janus why do you bother anymore.

Cause it is my will that he do so. This is all quite entertaining, you make very good pawns.

But let it continue. Janus explain again why their taking it out of contrast?

I think I've explained it clearly, and Janus explained it more clearly. There's just so much you can say to someone with a double digit IQ.

But..but, but-but. I want the argument to continue 🙁

Originally posted by darthsith19

Yeah, I thought so. You should quit while you're... oh nevermind.

OK Janus you win. Your one hell of a debater and I can see that there is no convincing you. That was a great argument though. Well done.

clappingclappingclappingclapping

Originally posted by Rampant ox
OK Janus you win. Your one hell of a debater and I can see that there is no convincing you. That was a great argument though. Well done.

clappingclappingclappingclapping


LOL. yeah, good one Janus. That picture of you with your head in your ass really proved your point.

Oh, and what happened to tdtd? Banned again? Lol.

Only darthsith could mistake that pic as supposing to be me instead of him.

DS, you need to pass whatever it is you're smoking so the rest of us can see what we want to see too.

Banned again? Yes I was banned for creating a stupid thread and allegedly trolling, i'm currently discussing it with Rex, but you're not helping your argument any by shifting attention to me just because Janus tore you a new one.

LOL, quite the sexy name, tdtd, if I may say so myself.

Thanks, getting Rex to listen to reason isn't exactly easy. But if he bans me again I'll get the hint, its just a star wars forum.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't Yoda sick and like 3-4 years away from his deathbed by the time of ANH?

Worst-case scenario, you could always pull a Numan.

Motoko, I remember you saying that your previous account was deleted, what was the name of it?

Originally posted by Gay Luke
Banned again? Yes I was banned for creating a stupid thread and allegedly trolling, i'm currently discussing it with Rex, but you're not helping your argument any by shifting attention to me just because Janus tore you a new one.

batman