OK, now it's time to predict Monday's analysis of the game which, as every football fan knows, rarely has anything to do with the pre-game matchup. If anything it has more to do with the officiating.
The refs for this week's matchup are:
BAL/PIT Bill Carollo
PHI/ARZ Walt Anderson
Anderson reffed the Ravens' Super Bowl win and Carollo was the ref when TB was playing STL in the '99 NFCCG, and Bert Emmanuel had control of the ball but because the nose of the ball hit the ground, it was ruled incomplete, thus creating the "Bert Emmanuel Rule." (yes, I got that from the Internet). I generally like Carollo because he has Phil Luckett on his crew, whom I also like. (Note: Luckett was the one who botched the Steelers/Lions coin flip game, so for me to like him says a lot). Watch me eat my words on Monday. 😱
At least it's not Scott Green or Ron Winter. Those are my 2 least favorite refs.
So here's hoping we get 2 fairly officiated games. But if we don't, let me go ahead and provide a "bank" for everyone to pull from on Monday as we break down the games:
"Wasn't enough visual evidence"
"Horrible call"
"Should have been overturned"
"If the refs didn't call the penalties, they would have won."
"Ball was uncatchable"
"If they didn't make that bad block-in-the-back call on the opening kickoff, they would have won."
"Refs gave that one away with that false start penalty in the first quarter."
"Being held on every play"
"How can you call (insert penalty) in the Conference Championship Game?"
"That was clearly pass inteference and the WR would have caught the ball"
"(Insert Ref) should be beaten to death"
"That was not holding"
And last but certainly not least...
"(Team 1) would have won if the refs didn't call BS (insert random penalty from any point in game) and turn (Team 2) into cheaters because as we all know, (Team 1) would have TOTALLY refused to accept the bad call." 😉