Originally posted by Autokrat
The conclusion is unsound, although the form of the argument is valid.
That's what I was thinking. In the scope of the argument, the conclusion follows logically from the premises. But from an outside perspective, I see a big "WTF" coming on.
I was playing around with pure empiricism, which claims that everything we know is based off sense data and that nothing can be learned a priori (I would disagree, but thats another topic entirely) and Socrates' statement that all ignorance was evil.This is the kind of stuff I do when I'm bored.
Go to law school.