Team Tournament Information and Discussion Thread

Started by Validus125 pages

Because Silver Surfer can't drain kinetic energy right?

I was referring to the whoever matches up with Grey Fox anyway.

Originally posted by leonidas
and if we're going to do something, we will damn well do it better. 😉 you all made the bed, kahn and i are just laying it in.

😖hifty: no one wants to know what you two do there......

We've reached a bit of an impasse here. We need to come to a decision unless we'd like to postpone the battle another week to allow deliberations on the definitions of all the rules. This new development of 6 Silver Surfers with Oan Powers is too much, let alone 5 possible Mon Els with Oan Powers and access to the Speedforce (re-read BWs description from the prior battle).

I agree that we either need to place a limit or outright ban the move. Upon further analysis, Kyle (and now Hal) do break the sub-Thanos limitation because the combined power of the originator and their subsequent independent constructs still falls under the power base of one roster slot and all originates form the same power ring. That one member of each roster, when using the independent construct ability, surpasses Thanos's independent energy output. Thanos can not under his own power sustain 5 Silver Surfer level beings and also maintain his own offensive capabilities.

I motion to strike. 👇

The original rule did not take into account the collective firepower this ability brings to bear for one roster spot which would be greater than an independently powered Thanos and breaks another established rule.

I think we should re-start battle #6 on Wednesday and allow the teams a day to re-draft their prep with more established guidlines.

Ban Hal and Kyle. 👆

A restart is not a bad idea

...... neither is a 3 Vs 3 matchup in a 3 Vs 3 tourney ....... 2dedhorse

😐

In the interest of fairness to all parties in this tournament, and due to concerns voiced by Khellendros, Grey Fox, Scoobless, leonidas, batdude, and myself, I motion for all of the judges to vote for:

1) The use of a limit for independently acting constructs for GLs in this tournament.

or

2) The outright banning of the tactic (which in turn would really, really piss Khellendros off because he was on that track in round 1 but it didn't pan out due to ambiguous rules and oversight by the judges).

If we vote for option 1 we're going to need time to establish fair limits and more than likely postpone the battle a couple of days to allow everyone a fair chance to argue their case.

If we vote for option 2 we can continue the battle tomorrow, allowing for both teams to start fresh and re-submit prep posts to Digi.

My vote is for option 1.

Validus votes for option 2.

Scoob, what's your opinion?

Actually I vote option 1.

Honestly i don't beleive that GLs can even willingly create these living beings

And even if they can.... this is still a 3 on 3 tourney, dragging in living characters (however they were "born"😉 to fight on your team is against the most basic rules

I'd vote for option 2

Option Two for me. I would actually like to see a nontainted fight where the actual participants have to attack their foes, instead of having other independent constructs do it for them. 😬

Ok, as it stands now:

Option 1: 2 judge votes for establishing limits (myself, Val)

Option 2: 1 Judge vote to ban the tactic outright (Scoob)

Participant votes:

Option 1: 0 Votes

Option 2: 1 Vote to ban the tactic outright (Batdude)

Batdude is a nobody.

Originally posted by Validus
Batdude is a nobody.

💃 💃 💃 💃

Goddamnit. I go on a nice roadtrip over the weekend, and make the mistake of coming back and reading all this this.

I say let the constructs stay in. F*ck it. At this point, Digi has shown that he WILL NOT side against BW and newjak unless the entire tournament rises up as one and kicks his f*cking email inbox in in their rage. And since I'm betting this isn't happening, just let the 8v8 fight end this 3v3 tournament and hand BW another win for using this mutated version of a strategy he didn't even come up with himself.

Ok...

Now that the much deserved rant is out of your system, what is the logical, rational Khells's opinion on the matter?

Ban or limit?

Maybe even a rematch if a ban goes through............ 😖hifty:........ we're in no rush to get finished here are we?

I'm not voting. If my logical arguments are superman, BW is a big green kryptonite dildo sodomizing them in the eyes of anyone who reads our posts. You cannot reason with people when arguing against BW any more than you can reason with the HIV virus infecting a patient.

🤨

Originally posted by Blair Wind
🤨

I believe he just called you a Kryptonite dildo.

😆