Sam Raimi Discussion

Started by Mr Parker23 pages

did you put your name there? He wants you to post your name there as well?

Originally posted by Dan-El
Wow, if I were to ever question your true geekdom, I'd be in the wrong.

You see, your opinion, as valued as you believe it is, is basically the same thing that everyone has heard before. Whether you are Mr. Parker or aren't is not really the issue. Not as much as your lack of originality, anyway. I'm glad you've found a place to post your idiotic ramblings, because I'm sure that you would have blown a gasket if you just couldn't ***** about how "organics suk" or the "Green Goblin costume, WTF?!!". I mean, these are the IMPORTANT topics in life (he said sarcastically).

Whether you liked the movies or not doesn't really appeal to me. They make plenty of money as is, and so I'm tempted to just tell you to take your opinion and **** off. You see, from my experience, those who have no true appreciation for the character have no appretiation for the movie, and those who do appreciate the character are usually those who have actually read more than ten issues of the comic. It is my guess that you watched the 90s Spider-Man cartoon and feel that you know all there is to know about Spider-Man. The rest of the knowledge you gained from internet sources such as Wikipedia, SpiderFan, and SamRuby.Com. As great outlets for Spidey knowledge as they are, without comic experience, your opinion doesn't add up to a pile of horseshit.

So please, follow these easy steps in order to make your posts more enjoyable (as negative as they are) to the general public:

1.) Read a ****ing comic
2.) Make your own opinion without using over-the-top wannabe fanboy lingo
3.) Don't blast me, mother ****er, or you will pay in spades, you cock smoking, testicle juggling, tea bagging, horse jerking, feeble minded wash up of a wannabe comic book fan.

I make learning fun!

P.S. Wash your hands after the horse jerking. Equestrian semen is always the hardest to remove. Just ask your mom! (That's right, you reduced me to a mother joke.)

😆 I'll just assume you're clutching your spider-man dvds while crying and stamping your feet because anyone on earth dare to consider them less than the holy golden creation of the almighty god, Salami Rainman. It's so obvious you didn't read my post entirely and your only purpose in a thread called "The official Sam Raimi is an idiot thread" is to 'try' to display your overwhelming maturity by attacking anyone who doesn't have your precious state of mind. TOO BAD. I'm here to stay... oh and why not tell Sam to read a comic too. I'm sure it'd be a lot more beneficial to everyone if he actually did for once.

Originally posted by Wesyeed
😆 I'll just assume you're clutching your spider-man dvds while crying and stamping your feet because anyone on earth dare to consider them less than the holy golden creation of the almighty god, Salami Rainman. It's so obvious you didn't read my post entirely and your only purpose in a thread called "The official Sam Raimi is an idiot thread" is to 'try' to display your overwhelming maturity by attacking anyone who doesn't have your precious state of mind. TOO BAD. I'm here to stay... oh and why not tell Sam to read a comic too. I'm sure it'd be a lot more beneficial to everyone if he actually did for once.

For one thing, I'm sorry to shatter your sophmoic picture of the kind of person I am, for I was neither crying nore clutching nor stamping. I was a bit pissed this morning and out of it, sense it was early and shit.

Anyway, second thing: I don't believe that the Spider-Man movies are God's gift to man. I believe that they are the best out of the line of Spider-Man media so far. I mean, the 70s live action show with Nick Hammond has nothing on this, obviously. The cartoons had longer to build up characters, so I don't include that.

And you know what? Sorry I went off on you. You're right in that I didn't read your whole post, since I didn't expect to come back here. So hey, sorry. Guess we can agree to disagree, and I'm certain I won't come back to this thread again. What am I gonna do anyway? "Convert the nonbelievers"?

EDIT

No it's me. How are you, Ock. I've been pretty vocal in the past about my distaste for sm1 over on the hype. Sm2's not too bad though. This is my first time in this side of the forum WHAT A WARM RECEPTION!!! LOL

I assure you all this is the first I've ever heard of Mr. Parker.

Well I'll be damned. Hey Wesyeed.

Yeah, welcome to the madhouse. Care for a straightjacket?? We have them in all sizes 😉

Originally posted by Wesyeed
I've been pretty vocal in the past about my distaste for sm1 over on the hype. Sm2's not too bad though.

I assure you all this is the first I've ever heard of Mr. Parker.

I must of missed it. But I agree, SM-2 was much better than the first one.

As for Mr Parker, just drop the name Man-Spider to any of the veterans on SHH, and they'll know exactly who that relates to. I used to defend him in the past. But lately I've seen a side to him I don't much care for.

Oh ok, gottcha...

I know how fround-upon it is to speak about what's not favorable in the movies so when i saw this thread, I said "finally a place free of flamers."

oops, I think I made a miscalculation when turning on my internet last night.

It's all in fun. I'd be a liar if I said I didn't find either of the spidey movie essentially good films worth a viewing (to see dunst in the rain). As a fanboy though it's a completely different matter.

Originally posted by Dan-El
For one thing, I'm sorry to shatter your sophmoic picture of the kind of person I am, for I was neither crying nore clutching nor stamping. I was a bit pissed this morning and out of it, sense it was early and shit.

Anyway, second thing: I don't believe that the Spider-Man movies are God's gift to man. I believe that they are the best out of the line of Spider-Man media so far. I mean, the 70s live action show with Nick Hammond has nothing on this, obviously. The cartoons had longer to build up characters, so I don't include that.

And you know what? Sorry I went off on you. You're right in that I didn't read your whole post, since I didn't expect to come back here. So hey, sorry. Guess we can agree to disagree, and I'm certain I won't come back to this thread again. What am I gonna do anyway? "Convert the nonbelievers"?

ok

Originally posted by Wesyeed
Oh ok, gottcha...

I know how fround-upon it is to speak about what's not favorable in the movies so when i saw this thread, I said "finally a place free of flamers."

oops, I think I made a miscalculation when turning on my internet last night.

It's all in fun. I'd be a liar if I said I didn't find either of the spidey movie essentially good films worth a viewing (to see dunst in the rain). As a fanboy though it's a completely different matter.

I agree with you on that Wesyeed.There were a few things in the movies that made it worth a viewing like Dunst in the rain-probably the best thing about the first one. 😄 and the train fight sequences between spidey and doc ock in the second film, but not much after all that was worth viewing.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
That post looks like you are implying that white rat is me.Surely YOU are not going to stoop to that level of false accusations that we are the same poster? especially after my last post I just posted to you.If so,there goes my opinion of you that your one of the few mature posters here that likes the movies.Please tell me I just misunderstood that post of yours? Like I said,I dont go around making the moronic posts he makes like that spiderman was a wuss in a fight against doc ock.

💃 😆

why can we not just let the thread die?

Well, i can say that doc ock is a great villain for spidey. But something didnt work and didnt make sense at all. Spiderman is supposed to be super strength, lifting 10 tons. Doc Ock is just a normal guy with tentacles. Any superstrenght. So, how on hell spidey hited ock so many times in the movie and didnt beat him? Doesnt make any sense.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Well, i can say that doc ock is a great villain for spidey. But something didnt work and didnt make sense at all. Spiderman is supposed to be super strength, lifting 10 tons. Doc Ock is just a normal guy with tentacles. Any superstrenght. So, how on hell spidey hited ock so many times in the movie and didnt beat him? Doesnt make any sense.

supposedly spiderman 'pulls' his punches. So he doesnt smash his opponents faces into mush.

That was one thing that bothered me.

99% of the time Spider-Man can't get near Ock because of the tentacles. But in the movie he got near Ock loads of times.

Yeah. Exaclty, spidey did hit ock very nearly. See the scenes in the cathedral or in ock's lair, when they are on water. Spidey punched him very hard, giving all of him, and ock was still ok. It was stupid. Normally, if spidey gets to punch ock clearly in his face and with all his strenght, ock is end. Even in the comics.

Btw,I can understand why people here would make the mistake into thinking that white rat here is me.Because like i said,he has copied and pasted things that I posted at another site only twisted and tweaked them a little bit like I mentioned.at that other site,my user name there is white rat and a poster from this site told him about my user name there and had him post things that I posted there both there and here at this site,sometimes they were the exact same thing of what "I" said and sometime he tweaked them a little. so I can understand how people could make the mistake that I was socking as him.His friend here at this site is asking him to do it to get a rise out of me because he cant get over a grudge we had.pretty sad if you ask me.

However,I cant believe the ignorance of those other two posters that actually thought that me and wesyeed were the same poster.Now THAT is pitiful to think that me and wesyeed were the same poster.how stupid.

Sam Raimi has done a good job with these movies.

your trying to be funny right? 😆

No.

Sorry if that bothers you. But I like the Spider-Man movies. Like most people.