'Huh?I don't think so.Here's the people that dislike YOU:Escape 81,Motoko Sama,Lightsnake,Darth Sexy,Veneificusand 1.People who 'hate' me(Only because I proved them wrong in a debate and they're being n00bs about it):You,Depwnzors,Pyro Tyranus.Contradicting yourself again,I see.'
The thing is, a few people are slightly irritated by me because I occasionally act like a troll and sometimes deliberately piss people like Escape off by acting like a fanboy because I understand how annoying they find it. You on the other hand are hated by many members because of your attitude: you are cocky when you have no reason to be, you act as if you are one of the top dogs of the forum without ever earning the title and your posts are overly aggressive without any traces of charm or humour.
'Second,REX is on a trip,he said he'd send in a Ban Request when he got back.'
Me and Rex already talked about it via pm, dumbass. It's been dealt with.
Kewl, sorry sleep deprivation. Usually the best time to attack an enemy base. Human alertness is at its worst between 0300 - 0500. something to do with biorythm or something like that, but back to the point
Reading the who likes who is interesting for the following
[QUOTE=7030132]Originally posted by GM Nebaris
'Huh?I don't think so.Here's the people that dislike YOU:Escape 81,Motoko Sama,Lightsnake,Darth Sexy,Veneificusand A list of people that most say are the better debators as the research and provide factual evidence with their theory and then we have 1.People who 'hate' me(Only because I proved them wrong in a debate and they're being n00bs about it):You,Depwnzors,Pyro Tyranus. poeple known to chant opinion over fact with the always brilliant logic of
cause I said so
My parents used to say that and I still never listened until they gave factual reasons LOL
Originally posted by GM NebarisAgain,I am only hated by three,and thats because they lost some debates against me and are holding it as a grudge.And so now I'm supposed to go to you on how to post?Last time I checked,you weren't a mod and I'm allowed to post however I want,n00b.You still haven't given me proof to the question I asked.And you claim to be trolling in debates yet presume to judge people as to who the best debaters are and no know nothing about debating in the first place.Contradicting yourself again,I see.
'Huh?I don't think so.Here's the people that dislike YOU:Escape 81,Motoko Sama,Lightsnake,Darth Sexy,Veneificusand 1.People who 'hate' me(Only because I proved them wrong in a debate and they're being n00bs about it):You,Depwnzors,Pyro Tyranus.Contradicting yourself again,I see.'The thing is, a few people are slightly irritated by me because I occasionally act like a troll and sometimes deliberately piss people like Escape off by acting like a fanboy because I understand how annoying they find it. You on the other hand are hated by many members because of your attitude: you are cocky when you have no reason to be, you act as if you are one of the top dogs of the forum without ever earning the title and your posts are overly aggressive without any traces of charm or humour.
'Second,REX is on a trip,he said he'd send in a Ban Request when he got back.'Give me some quotes that you talked to him(I still have my PMs to him about you being a sock) and get him to post in this topic and confirm your claim about you both talking,then I'll believe you,but until then,your full of shit,dumbass.Me and Rex already talked about it via pm, dumbass. It's been dealt with.
'And you claim to be trolling in debates yet presume to judge people as to who the best debaters are and no know nothing about debating in the first place.Contradicting yourself again,I see.'
Please explain how I contradicted myself. And please try to make more sense. However, I wouldn't expect anything more from one as simple minded as you are.
'Give me some quotes that you talked to him(I still have my PMs to him about you being a sock) and get him to post in this topic and confirm your claim about you both talking,then I'll believe you,but until then,your full of shit,dumbass.'
It's none of your business. Why would I share my pms with you. Isn't that against the rules? Just pm him yourself.
Originally posted by GM NebarisEasy,You claim you troll and don't debate,yet presume to judge people in the debating department,when you yourself don't debate at all.You contradicted yourself,if you can't see this,then YOU are clearly the simpleminded one,it's not my fault that you're too stupid to understand this.Still waiting for some solid proof to my question.
[B]'And you claim to be trolling in debates yet presume to judge people as to who the best debaters are and no know nothing about debating in the first place.Contradicting yourself again,I see.'Please explain how I contradicted myself. And please try to make more sense. However, I wouldn't expect anything more from one as simple minded as you are.
'Give me some quotes that you talked to him(I still have my PMs to him about you being a sock) and get him to post in this topic and confirm your claim about you both talking,then I'll believe you,but until then,your full of shit,dumbass.'No,it isn't against the rules.And why so personal all of a sudden?Hiding something?It's none of your business. Why would I share my pms with you. Isn't that against the rules? Just pm him yourself.
I'll PM him anyways.
After re-reading the original question in entirety I would have to say no.
That is only because of the fact that Sion survived due to his hatred and his will. I believe that he would be unable to focus that hatred and will with such control to create the storm, without dying himself.
To put plainly, by trying to double task the thing that keeps him alive to activate something else he crashes the system.
However, if he was whole to begin with and had access to Palp's library, then pretty bloody likely he could have
Originally posted by GM NebarisWho else then?Give me some names.I could really care less anyway.
'Again,I am only hated by three,and thats because they lost some debates against me and are holding it as a grudge.'I already explained why you're hated Luke, and believe me, you're hated by way more than 3.
'You still haven't given me proof to the question I asked'And what question would that be?
And prove to me,prove to me that to doesn't take Force Power to create a Force Storm to Sidious magnitude!We never see anyone,ANYONE,else but him use it,which leads me to believe that he was the only one who COULD use it to that degree.
'Easy,You claim you troll and don't debate,yet presume to judge people in the debating department,when you yourself don't debate at all.You contradicted yourself,if you can't see this,then YOU are clearly the simpleminded one,it's not my fault that you're too stupid to understand this.Still waiting for some solid proof to my question.'
You're so dumb.
Firstly, I only occasionally troll but that's neither here nor there. Even if I trolled non stop, I would still not have been contreadicting myself because you don't have to debate frequently (or even be good a it) to judge how good a debater someone is. You're dumb if you don't realise this. Just pm Traya or Ush if you're still too dumb to realise.
'And prove to me,prove to me that to doesn't take Force Power to create a Force Storm to Sidious magnitude!We never see anyone,ANYONE,else but him use it,which leads me to believe that he was the only one who COULD use it to that degree.'
I really couldn't make too much sense out of this anyway, but I think I can gather what you're asking. All I can say is that the Book of Anger clearly states that raw force power is not a factor in creating force storms - 'the use of emotion to control the Force'.
Originally posted by GM NebarisOne problem,dumbass,Traya and Ush DO DEBATE!Ush has in this forum many times,and traya has in the Versus forum aswell.
'Easy,You claim you troll and don't debate,yet presume to judge people in the debating department,when you yourself don't debate at all.You contradicted yourself,if you can't see this,then YOU are clearly the simpleminded one,it's not my fault that you're too stupid to understand this.Still waiting for some solid proof to my question.'You're so dumb.
Firstly, I only occasionally troll but that's neither here nor there. Even if I trolled non stop, I would still not have been contreadicting myself because you don't have to debate frequently (or even be good a it) to judge how good a debater someone is. You're dumb if you don't realise this. Just pm Traya or Ush if you're still too dumb to realise.
And yes,you DO need to be a good debater to judge people,that way you know who's better than you and who isn't.The thing that seperates the people who suck and who don't is the fact that the REAL debaters provide proof,like I have done and asked for and Escape and a few others have done aswell,where the ones like you,only provide speculation and opinion,which mean shit in a debate.
Originally posted by GM NebarisWTF?You are an idiot,half of those people haven't even CLAIMED to hate me,you stupid n00b.The Antediilluvians never hated me(Maybe Sorgo,but he never even debated,he just bullied people into agreeing with him),Balance,Medvock,Jan,Legion,Vious and Rampant haven't either,stop lying,n00b.And stop including your sock,n00b.Kent sucked aswell as Numan,nobody liked either of them.You fail,again.
'Who else then?Give me some names.I could really care less anyway.'Me, HK, Jam, Pyro, rampant, Fox, Legion of Maul, Vious, Numan, many of the antediluvians, Kent, Depwnzers, Medvock, the Balance etc.
'One problem,dumbass,Traya and Ush DO DEBATE!Ush has in this forum many times,and traya has in the Versus forum aswell.'
I think you missed my point. Both Ush and Traya are English professors. And again, try to make more sense. Ush in particular would be able to objectively state whether I was contradicting myself or not.
'And yes,you DO need to be a good debater to judge people,that way you know who's better than you and who isn't.'
Do you need to be a tennis pro to judge who is better out of Murray and Nadal? Dude, quit embarassing yourself.
Originally posted by GM NebarisThat's because you are an idiot.
[B]'And prove to me,prove to me that to doesn't take Force Power to create a Force Storm to Sidious magnitude!We never see anyone,ANYONE,else but him use it,which leads me to believe that he was the only one who COULD use it to that degree.'I really couldn't make too much sense out of this anyway, but I think I can gather what you're asking.
All I can say is that the Book of Anger clearly states that raw force power is not a factor in creating force storms - 'the use of emotion to control the Force'.Sidious always states 'I' meaning himself,he doesn't say ANYONE can use the Force Storm to the degree that he did.Your point is moot aswell as this thread.
Originally posted by GM NebarisUsh and Traya haven't even been on in awhile,and they wouldn't waste their time on a thread like this.Just look at the title,it's about an unsupported assumption that is as stupid as the idiot who made it.I'm only in here to laugh at you and your unsupported assumptions.
'One problem,dumbass,Traya and Ush DO DEBATE!Ush has in this forum many times,and traya has in the Versus forum aswell.'I think you missed my point. Both Ush and Traya are English professors. And again, try to make more sense. Ush in particular would be able to objectively state whether I was contradicting myself or not.
'And yes,you DO need to be a good debater to judge people,that way you know who's better than you and who isn't.'We aren't talking about Tennis,we are talking about debating.And even then,Tennis is just whacking a ball around and making sure it doesn't hit the net.Wherein debating is much more complex and it requires skill to be a good debater such as where to check your proof and to find a source that is as solid as your claim.Quit straying from the said topic.Do you need to be a tennis pro to judge who is better out of Murray and Nadal? Dude, quit embarassing yourself.