Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Where are the credible sources such as Sama, Nai, and Escape?
Originally posted by Swirly Girl
*Sigh*To be honest tdtd, you've effectively been out debated. Lightsnake's provided emails from the co-creator of TotJ on his opinion considering the matter, whereas you've provided what? I've not really seen anything come out from you apart from some seriously flawed premises and the inability to accept the fact that the co-creator of TotJ's opinion > your own.
TRaya, you're a teacher correct? How is that me being outdebated? To be outdebated, he would have had to provide logical arguments that outweigh mine, which he hasn't. Obviously he's provided proof so if you interpret it this way then obviously I'm interpreting it incorrectly.. But I guess Sama was right, Preference+Popularity.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
TRaya, you're a teacher correct? How is that me being outdebated? To be outdebated, he would have had to provide logical arguments that outweigh mine, which he hasn't. Obviously he's provided proof so if you interpret it this way then obviously I'm interpreting it incorrectly.. But I guess Sama was right, Preference+Popularity.
Another rung lost...
Originally posted by Arcana
You realize that Sama, Nai, and Escape aren't sources per say, but instead educated and skilled debtors. Clearly Lightsnake has provided ample proof to back up his arguments. Why he needs to get the approval of the before mentioned debtors, I fail to understand.
You also fail to understand that lightsnake provided proof, not arguments... That's not discrediting him, it's stating that instead of proving arguments he provided proof, perhaps you should read this entire thread, maybe then you won't "fail to understand".. And yes, those are skilled debators, not debtors, and since this is a versus forum that involves logical debating, they're the ones I want to confirm lightsnake's arguments, or proof.. Because I can ask the simple question of "how", with all those lines, and I fully intend to.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You're right. Your opinion=fact. Because I have constructed arguments(obviously you haven't read anything on this thread), and lightsnake got emails from the authors, I somehow lost a debate? Wonderful logic Arcana, no really.
As I've told you over AIM, the "Yep" sealed the deal. I agree with Lightsnake on the matter (as much as it hurts my side of the argument). The other part of Veitch's statement is irrelevant. He put a period to seperate two thoughts. One which was "Yep" as in "Yes, Lightsnake, Yoda > Kun/Sith - quit emailing me".
LS: Clarifying! Yoda > Ancient Sith/Kun l0lz right?
Veitch: Yep.
And may I remind you all it could really matter less how many people agree. Just because we are in agreement, doesn't make it right (as we could be wrong, but that's highly doubtful). Argumentum ad populum.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
TRaya, you're a teacher correct? How is that me being outdebated?
Because he's used logical arguments which you've not debunked (instead insulting him) and he's also got the opinion of one of the co-creators of the character in question's support.
Again, I reiterate; Tom Veitch's opinion > yours.
To be outdebated, he would have had to provide logical arguments that outweigh mine, which he hasn't.
He most certainly has!
Obviously he's provided proof
You see the light!
so if you interpret it this way then obviously I'm interpreting it incorrectly.. But I guess Sama was right, Preference+Popularity.
O rly? Ya rly? No wai!
Yes Sama you're right and so are you GH. I just thought the purpose of this forum is debating. Obviously 99% of the people here can't debate and it's much easier to get an email from somebody.. And again, I did email Tom asking him how Yoda could be on par with Kun and the ancient sith, judging by the movies, the books, and the comics, because it's very illogical, but hopefully I'll get those questions answered.
Originally posted by Swirly Girl
Because he's used logical arguments which you've not debunked (instead insulting him) and he's also got the opinion of one of the co-creators of the character in question's support.Again, I reiterate; Tom Veitch's opinion > yours.
He most certainly has!
You see the light!
O rly? Ya rly? No wai!
Where are the logical arguments Traya? I'm not saying mine were infallible but where were his logical arguments(TV) aside, that state Yoda>Kun.. and by Logical Arguments I don't mean quotes.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Says the one that hasn't read the thread at all, called me a debtor, and clearly can't understand the concept of being "out-debated".
Ah yes... so I misspelled a single word... that automatically labels me as stupid, and for your information little man, I have read the thread and think, I have been at this damn forum long enough that, I would carry some weight around here.
Also, I do understand the concept of being out-debated... I mean you are ample proof of what it means to be out-debated.