Exar Kun vs. Yoda

Because Yoda is a master of countering and restricting the Dark Side and Kun, with his saber drawn, never uses said amulet in a true fight. So, Yoda could jump circles around Exar Kun, given his own extreme saber skills and force mastery.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Because Yoda is a master of countering and restricting the Dark Side and Kun, with his saber drawn, never uses said amulet in a true fight. So, Yoda could jump circles around Exar Kun, given his own extreme saber skills and force mastery.

See that is EXACTLY my point on your lack of debating skills lightsnake. You provide irrelevant quotes and hyperbole.. You still have YET to answer the question of HOW which is why you fail.. HOW is his "countering and restricting the dark side" going to stop the amulet? And Yoda can jump circles all he wants, youre assuming his saber skills and/or force abilities are better than Kun. And youre ASSUMING Kun cannot use the amulet in a fight, when we've seen Kun use it when he HAS to.

Because the amulet is a dark side tool?
And Kun used it once...a Kun who was facing a Sith Wyrm. He has several saber duels with Jedi, never once does he used it there. Yoda's the faster and more agile combatnant, so I could say when Kun swings, Yoda could easily blind side him?

Lightsnake, the amulet blast is not a force based attack. You cannot use absence of proof when it contradicts your theories. Kun used it once on the sith wyrm and once on Aleema, although it was a smaller blasts. Yoda COULD be faster true, but so could Kun. There is no evidence to suggest Yoda can block an amulet blast like Luke can.

It channels the force, it's a dark side item. And Yod, given how fast we've seen him move...

and considering Yoda is the Jedi Grandmaster who's taken out numerous Dark Jedi...

Originally posted by Lightsnake
It channels the force, it's a dark side item. And Yod, given how fast we've seen him move...

and considering Yoda is the Jedi Grandmaster who's taken out numerous Dark Jedi...

Again with the irrelevant text, i'm trying to teach you how to debate.. What does Yoda being the GM have to do anything with this fight? We've seen Yoda move fast, and we've also seen the amulet blasts be instant.. There is nothing to remotely suggest Yoda can block them.

He's the strongest Jedi. When've we seen the amulet blasts instant? We've never seem them in real time.

You saw the scans, how are they NOT instant? Both scans actually. And for the millionth time.. Yoda being the strongest Jedi means nothing to this debate.. This is my point where you cannot answer the question of HOW, so instead you run to the authors.

Because time in stills doesn't translate well to real time.
And please, you ask me to prove how Yoda can counter Sith amulets, so I happen to bring out textual evidence...and you cry off that I'm 'just using text'

No, I ask you how he can stop a sith blast, you say "Yoda knows everything YOda is God". You haven't provided a HOW at all, just irrelevant text. And again there is zero evidence that Yoda can block the amulet blasts.

I don't NEED to provide a how, the text is canon

Exactly, after all that arguing and you not being able to prove how, you revert back to the fact that you lack the debating skills to argue, so you must use text. Thank you for proving my point 100%.. And the text doesn't state how, just states that Yoda>Kun... VERY Conclusive.

Conclusive enough for me

Right, which is why I said you don't belong on this forum. It is stricly for debating and you have proven that you do not know how to debate.. And it's conclusive enough for you because youre a PT fanboy. You don't want to prove a "How" nor can you prove a "How" which is exactly why your arguments consist of pure text and email. Yet nothing talks about the ancient sith, so I'll wait for you to come up with a specific email for it.

Providing proof isn't debating? Miss how I asked KJA about the Ancients in my email OR the itsy bitsy detail of me querying to Veitch on the Ancients?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Providing proof isn't debating?

No, the point of a debate is the "HOW". You saying "Lucas said Yoda owns all, I don't have to prove how the end", is not debating. It's a sheepish way to get out of the fact that you can't debate, otherwise you would have proven a HOW.

Miss the fact that nowhere did KJA mention the ancients, and since Tom Vietch didn't create the ancient sith, his opinion is just opinion?

No, the point is winning.
How's this? Yoda's an amazing force user and saber duelist. Figt over?

And Tom Veitch originally created the Ancient Sith...KJA filled in the blanks. And considering he worked with KJA to write TOTJ, just maybe this is a tad valid and since he's an LFL employee and author, he>You?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No, the point is winning.
How's this? Yoda's an amazing force user and saber duelist. Figt over?

And Tom Veitch originally created the Ancient Sith...KJA filled in the blanks. And considering he worked with KJA to write TOTJ, just maybe this is a tad valid and since he's an LFL employee and author, he>You?

Winning without arguing and going to the authors just makes you an inept coward, nothing more.. And you can say what you want about TV creating the ancient sith, because even if that's true, KJA has full authority over the GAOTS, meaning the most powerful sith.. And since you can't tell us what exactly it was TV helped with in GAOTS, the KJA>You and TV. So again, Tom saying Yoda>Kun=valid because he created Kun. Tom saying Yoda>Ancient Sith=invalid because he didn't create the ancient sith. Understand?

Or someone with a smattering of brains.

This is over. Completely and utterly, just accept your loss gracefully and move on

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Or someone with a smattering of brains.

This is over. Completely and utterly, just accept your loss gracefully and move on

Considering the fact that you can't form cogent arguments and that TV has no authority over the ancient sith, I'd say you're pretty much done until your next batch of emails.