No bro, the first email was his opinion about Yoda being on top of Exar Kun(which doesn't show anything about how he would take a DLOTS on in a 1 on 1 battle), the SECOND email had nothing to do with his opinion. YOu can't just interpret something the way YOU want to because IT proves your case. Again, it doesn't state anything about 1 v 1, about the ancient sith, etc.. Now if you want to argue, provide YOUR argument, don't start looking to authors for help.
authority that states nothing about a relevant thread, and your opinion is irrelevant. He mentions nothing about the ancient sith.. Obviously you don't need an argument because yours were defeated, which is why you turn to the authors.. And if you don't need an argument, what are you doing on this forum?
Making up bullshit is your last resort? He never answers your question and instead refers to GL which makes me believe yourre more full of shit than I originallly thought. Reality and Logic>Your interpretation. Since I've provided an argument and you haven't provided anything but quotes and emails to save yourself, you lose by default.
No, this is your inability to interpret the response because it's what you want to believe.. Any idiot will interpret it the way I have, which is the factual way.. I'm glad you can tell me what you THINK he said while I can tell you what he did say.. Again, if you have no argument, then stop posting.
Let's wait then....for Nai ti interpret it, and others...let's see how THEY interpret it.
I'm sorry, Sexy, but this argument is done and you have lost, sirrah. I have an author, book evidence, sourcebook evidence, feats and just about the entire SW canon.
Your argument is done. It was done te second I got the first email from Tom
Actually my argument is valid, and you have no argument, nor have you ever had an argument on this matter which is why you fall back on emails.. Sorry bro, there is 1 way to interpret that email, and not your way, so unless you have something conclusive in terms of a 1 on 1 fight, you lose. And quit sucking up to Nai, it's enough that you need authors to argue for you, don't expect Nai to save you.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy1. Veitch is one of the fricking creators of TotJ, are you insane to even dare arguing this you egotistical, logically fallacious loud mouth? Take it as exactly what it's saying. Veitch says that "Yoda>Kun and the Ancient Sith" is what Lucas was intending. That's enough, the bottom line, end of the story. Your "case" is done here.
1. He said Yoda is above Kun, whatever that means
2. He said he THOUGHT lucas intended to have Yoda/PT over the ancient sith.. Nothing in that email states that's what he believes. You need to learn to understand what you're reading.
Yoda being the best swordsman in the order and sthe strongest Jedi master up to the prequels and being placed on top of Kun by Tom Veotch, the co-creator of TOTJ who also cites that he believes that's how Lucas, who helped with TOTJ and defined the parameters for Kun intended it along with an earlier email of Veitch's that says Yoda is defintiely on top when asked how he stacks up to Kun and The Ancients and when asked to clarify he said yes Yoda is on top and that's what he meant?
Originally posted by Darth SexyOh, is that right? And what would this one way be? And Lightsnake isn't bullshitting, thanks so very much. Try and present an actual argument while you're at it, hyperbole is not your friend.
Your interpretation of the situation and emails is 100% irrelevant. There is only ONE way to interpret your last email, and there's not enougb bullshit you can pull to interpret it differently, in regards to the ancient sith. Now if I want your arguments, I'll ask Tom.
I haven't seen Sama post anything agreeing with YOda>ancient sith, I haven't seen Nai, I haven't seen escape. You have zero argument lightsnake, so stop acting like you have provided something. I won't argue the validity the emails anymore but I can easily argue that Tom "believes" that's what Lucas wanted. I didn't know speculation+possible opinion=fact. And nowhere does he say "Yes" as in in "Yes I think Yoda>Ancients". He said yes that is what he believes Lucas intended. Learn how to interpret emails. What do I care about that someone else who hasn't offered anything in this conversation thinks?
Originally posted by Lord Saboteur
Oh, is that right? And what would this one way be? And Lightsnake isn't bullshitting, thanks so very much. Try and present an actual argument while you're at it, hyperbole is not your friend.
Considering the fact that I have provided 10 pages of argument, while you just came here, and considering the fact that you misuse the term "hyperbole", it is my assumption that you:
1. Haven't read anything on this forum and decided to chime in
2. Have no understanding of the proper usage of terms.