Originally posted by willRules
But that's my point exactly. You just did what I said in the previous posts. How can you prove that in those issues, both Cap and Spidey were fighting to the best of their ability? I will answer it for you, you can't because If in the fight Spidey was fighting to the best of his ability, he would be dodging Cap's punches like he dodges bullets and Cap the same.
See, here's the thing, that's nothing more than an assumption... This is kind of circular but: Cap dodges bullets just as effectively as Spiderman.. does that mean that Spiderman therefore can't hit Captain America because he'll dodge everything Spidey throws at him like he does to bullets? See how that logic doesn't really work?
Originally posted by willRules
Spidey would hit Cap with equal force to hitting Carnage. in a comic he wouldn't as Spidey doesn't kill, but that proves my point. It's not the best of his abilities.
In a comic he wouldn't.. and in the forums he wouldn't either unless otherwise stated, self imposed limitations of CIS are not exempt from these arguments. 😬
Now someone explain to me this: even if Spiderman holds back his strength to keep from hurting others too badly, why does every Spiderman fan assume that he holds back his speed and spider sense as well?
Holding back his power shouldn't affect his ability to dodge or his speed. 😬 Are we to assume that Spiderman LIKES to be hit in the face?
And yet every time we get into these arguments "spiderman holds back" becomes the ultimate defected excuse for him being hit...
It makes no sense.. If he's so good at dodging, then he should dodge good fighters.. unless good fighters play his spider sense false.. and they do.
Originally posted by willRules
I was speaking in English, please don't insult my posts. 🙁I was merely stating that if you say Cap can hit spidey in a certain comic, then you are assuming both Cap and spidey are fighting at their best and that therefore Cap's speed maybe is as inferior to Spidey's speed as people like myself have suggested.
Yeah, see the problem here is that this argument is contingent on the benefit of the doubt...
There's nothing that really supports that suggestion. The problem isn't only in DIRECT COMPARISONS but also found within their day to day feats as well...
Cap fans could just as easily suggest that in a straight fight Spiderman would never lay a hand on cap, the difference between that suggestion and the one about spiderman being that much faster than cap, is the former is actually rooted in multiple proofs of evidence.
Originally posted by willRules
Or maybe you might suggest that the feat in the comic shows Cap's skill overcompensating for Peter's superhuman speed. However you must accept the possibility that Cap or Spidey or both men were not performing at their best and therefore that feat is invalid. Otherwise all you are saying is "Cap fighting really well might be able to beat Spidey if he is fighting really badly".
It's not invalid though...
There's nothing that states they weren't fighting at their best.
It's an assumption either way, but in the end we're left with what happened.. and regardless of whether or not they were at their peaks we seen several things still proven...
cap can hit spiderman.
cap is stunningly fast by spidey's own admission.
cap can take spiderman's hits.
cap vastly out-wieghs spiderman in hand to hand skills by spidey's own admission.
cap's punches are both effective and can numb spidey below the waist in thee hits by spiderman's own admission.
See the major problem is this... While people supporting cap using those feats may very well be assuming that the fighters are at their best during comic battles, and while that may be a fallacy... it's ALSO a fallacy to assume that their "fighting best" would be vastly different from the MULTITUDES of evidence from anything we've seen.