Originally posted by Alliance
No.In fact, it very much does.
This is true, but then you realize that homosexuality is not strictly genetic and is observable in many species. You then realize that it is a by-product of being sexually attracted to other members of your same species. There is nothing wrong, or unnatural about it. On the contrary, becuase it has survived, its evidence against a strong genetic link.
Its a very big deal. You claim to know things you clearly do not.
Originally posted by FeceMan
1. Yes. There is.2. Yes, it does have a negative connotation. The connotation does not, however, make it any less accurate.
Surely, a strict evolutionist such as yourself would agree that the inability--well, lack of a proclivity--to engage in an activity that would help ensure the survival of one's genetic code would not be considered helpful.
3. We'll have to agree to disagree on this rather moot point.
Idiot...
1) People don't suffer from Homosexuality. Homosexuals suffer from the bigotry that comes out of f*ckers like you and JIA....that is all.
2) In an Evolutionary Perspective, Homosexuality would indeed be VERY HELPFUL as it would help limit the population. And we know limitting the population is essential for its survival according to Evolution.
3) God being Gay would not render him imperfect, because he is ALREADY imperfect according to the contradictions and hypocrisy that represents him, AND being STraight does NOT equal being perfect.
I can easily, and factually say, that Straight people have done horrible things throughout history. There have been FEW homosexuals who have ever greatly harmed others throughout history....the heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals in terms of who is evil. ✅
Please...enough with your bullshit logic. Go do something.....
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Idiot...1) People don't suffer from Homosexuality. Homosexuals suffer from the bigotry that comes out of [b]f*ckers
like you and JIA....that is all.[/b]
2) In an Evolutionary Perspective, Homosexuality would indeed be VERY HELPFUL as it would help limit the population. And we know limitting the population is essential for its survival according to Evolution.
3) God being Gay would not render him imperfect, because he is ALREADY imperfect according to the contradictions and hypocrisy that represents him, AND being STraight does NOT equal being perfect.
I can easily, and factually say, that Straight people have done horrible things throughout history. There have been FEW homosexuals who have ever greatly harmed others throughout history....the heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals in terms of who is evil. ✅Please...enough with your bullshit logic. Go do something.....
You really are the replacement for whobdamandog.
Is God a Virgin ?
We already know about the Virgin Mary
Most of us assume that Jesus Christ was a Virgin as well, as there is no record of his sex life, and as the Catholic Church makes no recognition or reference to a sex life of any kind.
But what about GOD himself?
Has God ever had sex ? If yes, with who? If no, then why is he male ? What's the point to having a GENDER if sex is not an aspect of who you are?
Some people may argue that God does indeed experience SEX, when WE experience it. But if that is so, is he there during rape, peadophilia, bestiality ?
Is he present during homosexual sex ? Or is he only there when sex is present in marriage?
Or is he there in EVERY SEXUAL ACT that involves Love....what about Lust ?
Is God even sexual? If not, how and why is he male ?
Feceman would just loveeeeeeee your new thread..........lol
I believe god is in all experiences which would include your sex topic....
The god of the bible of course would have him chaste..and being that god cannot experience what his creation does and could never understand and so that god would be limited.