Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I'll admit I don't know who Leonard Cohen is, but by the time Blondie's song came out hip hoppers were already rapping in the underground, it just wasn't a mainstream thing yet.
Precisely, and it's mainstream hip hop that gave birth to the likes of Wu-Tang Clan etc.
Originally posted by Afro Cheese
When who-kid said "I guess it can be considered music, not the most creative or original music ever" I take it as the same as saying "Bush isn't exactly the brightest president ever." Not just that it's literally not the MOST innovative, but that it's not innovative in general. Maybe I was wrong, maybe not. Either way I didn't see anyone really defending it so posted about why I thought it was innovative/original/creative..
Yeah, it is creative, it can be innovative with language at least, but that was never the argument.
He said it's not the most creative, the most innovative or the MOST original. He never said it wasn't creative, innovative or original at all. If you think hip hop is the most innovative, original and creative genre, you have problems.
Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Dream Theater can never match the power of say an old school RZA produced hip hop track, if you ask me. I don't care about the avenues they take to make the music, I care about the sound that comes through my speakers and that alone. Music is about emotion to me.
That's not being discussed. 'Kid said it's not the MOST creative, original or innovative, so you're arguing that it is creative, original and innovative.
So what? Nobody is deny that it's those things, simply that it's not the most of each, and it's not.
No hip hop artist will be as innovative as Dream Theater because they simply don't have the instrumental musicianship. No hip hop artist will be as innovative as Patton, they simply don't have the broad genre-spanning experience. I'm not sure what point you're attempting to make.
Yes, it's creative and sometimes innovative. So? It's not the most.
Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Rhyming itself isn't innovative anymore, but rhyming has changed drastically over the years and people are still innovating rhyming today. Compare anything pre-86 to any Rakim song.. the compare that to Nas or GZA.. then compare that to early Eminem.. then compare that to MF Doom. There is always room for innovation in ANYTHING. There are tons of words in the English dictionary, add that on to newly developed slang words and it becomes clear that rhyming is no exception.
Yes, but it will never compare to an entire band of quality musicians tapping into the universe that is music. As in, versatility and innovation, not preference.
Musicians have a lot more to work with, and a vocal MC will never have that.
Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Hip hop may be all about lyricism to you, but to me the lyrics are only as good as they compliment the beat. Look at true classic hip hop songs, and then look at how important the beats actually are. Take Mobb Deep's Survival Of The Fittest for instance. It's not just dope because of the lyrics, or the flow, or the delivery. All these things are dope. But it's REALLY dope because of the depressed, bleek piano melody that sets the perfect tone for the hopeless, street struck rhymes that they spit over it. Without that beat, that song would be nothing IMO. This isn't an isolated example. Apply the same question to any classic song:Wu Tang Clan- CREAM
Organized Konfusion - Stress
Cannibal Ox - Pigeon
Dr. Dre and Snoop - Nothin But a G Thang
Public Enemy - Fight The Power
Outkast - ATLiens
Ice Cube - When Will They Shoot?
Blackstar - Theives In The NightAll these songs are completely different from one another. Each one a different style of hip hop. Each one a championed classic by many hip hop fans. Each one has a seriously dope beat. Actually.. I can't even THINK of a great hip hop song with a wack beat. The music is very much important. I see how people could confuse this.. because hip hop instrumentals don't sound like anything special on their own. It has a minimalist approach to say the least. But it's very effective if you ask me.
What is your point? Hip hop beats will never be as innovative as quality musicianship on instruments. Yes, those songs are blinding. Yes, the beats are really good. So what? Nobody is arguing that.
If you believe that a hip hop MC or collective could ever match the innovation or creativity of the likes of Zappa, Prince etc, people who have mastered instruments and the avenues of musical expression (which far outnumber lyrical avenues), then I'd say you've got problems.
Hip hop can have great minimalistic beats, but that's because they compliment the rhyme and the rhyme compliments them. They are minimalistic because they simply cannot get further.
Danny Carey of Tool has a drum part played to a fibonacci time sequence. No MC could rhyme to that time successfully. That's why they have to compliment each other.
Two minimalist approaches combining to create a maximum effect.
The argument wasn't anything to do with whether it can be good, it was whether hip hop is the most innovative, original or creative genre. It's not. That's not to say it's NOT innovative, original or creative.
-AC