Originally posted by Mr Master
None of this is consequential,the term "Universe" can be eaily interpreted as "Multi-verse: in Marvel, I've proven this already.
Here's a quick example:
"and where ONE ETERNITY would ensure a BOUNDLESS Universe, a MULTI-ETERNITY would ensure a BOUNDLESS MULTI-VERSE"
The embodiment of the MULTI-VERSE is introduced as "Multi-Eternity"...
Now in this same ARC, the MULTI-VERSE is referred to as just "Eternity" (which usually stands for a Single Universe)
Multi-Eternity called Eternity by Reed
"What was revealed to me through the Cosmic Entity known as ETERNITY"
So, you have decided that, when the terms multiverse or omniverse or universe are used, in the way that you agree with, it is correct.
And, when the terms multiverse or omniverse or universe are used in a way that you disagree with, they are wrong.
Well, that is all I needed to know.
You have shown the entire forum, that you won't even adhere to the words of Jim Starlin, whose name you have been throwing around for a week, in an effort to support your views.