Originally posted by leonidas
okay . . . (just desperately trying to keep track and be thorough . . .) 🙄okay. so, for the record:
m-body = totality of the concept
totality = concept (conceptual purpose) + power + sentience
oops . . .
m-body = totality
totality = concept (conceptual purpose) + power + sentience
yet, you say kill the m-body and . . . the concept and power stays behind . . .? 😕
impossible. by your definition killing the m-body is tantamount to killing the totality of the concept. [b]nothing
should be left behind.totality is . . . total. you can't say the m-body is the totality THEN say that if it is destroyed parts of it are left behind. you yourself said m-body = sentience, concept and power. wipe all that out by throwing it into oblivion, and there is nothing left. no power. no sentience. no concept.
clearly that did not happen, therefore it is equally clear the m-body does not equal the totality of the abstract. [/B]
Excellent post.
Mr Master argues that the Mbodys are the totality of the concept and yet goes on to claim that the Mbodys can be killed and yet leave behind their power? 😕
You've done well Leonidas. Anyone who actually analyses the presented arguments can see where the truth lies.