Originally posted by Bro SMASH
There's at least two instances where Superman said he can destroy a planet with physical strength so to say he can't is false.
Why? I've seen Superman fanboys cry for days about Cell's claim of solar system destruction (because it shows Gohan overpowering solar system destruction with one hand, and that'd be just too devastating a blow for them) so why should I treat Superman's claim any differently?
Originally posted by Bro SMASH
[B]
Also, you can't just say Frieza would give Superman a fight just because he can destroy a planet.
Sure I can, list people in the DCU that have Frieza's showings but wouldn't give Superman a fight.
You can't do this, people with Frieza's showings are held with the same regard to power as Superman.
Originally posted by Bro SMASH
[B]
Not only do you gotta look at HOW he can destroy a planet (which was by a chain reaction) but you also gotta look at what kind of advantages he has. So far, the only advantage Frieza has over Superman is firepower and even that won't take down him down.
Sure it will, Superman has been taken down by significantly less than Frieza firepower.
Originally posted by Bro SMASH
[B]
Where is your proof that Goku can destroy a more than a planet?
Being more powerful than Frieza.
Originally posted by Bro SMASH
[B]
We always go by how Superman is portrayed in the comics.
Then why are you acting like he goes around left and right slaughtering guys as powerful as Frieza?