Originally posted by Dark-JaxxWhat about Nappa and his mustache? Or any of the other saiyans shown even if they aren't canon.
About Vegeta growing a mustache, Vegeta even stated a Saiyan's hair does not grow at all.
Originally posted by StyleTimeI can easily understand nearly all the movies not being canon since they have no place. But the anime has a Garlic Jr. Saga that takes place after Dead Zone making Dead Zone part of the anime..somehow. GT also being said not to be part of the anime is what I don't get. It's specifically made to follow the anime. It may not be canon to the manga but that's really not the point as the anime has stuff non-canon anyway and isn't the real canon so what does it matter if it has more. And Trunks having his sword in GT would make Taipon movie canon to the series also. None of the other movies have anything to connect with the series except those two.
You guys missed my point. I'm saying that the logic behind what Kento said earlier is unreasonable. Having the same creative team that made a canon series doesn't make non-canon material suddenly canon.I understand why it shouldn't be used, but I don't personally have much of a problem with the non-canon stuff. Superman still beats Goku either way...
Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
the thread starter stated anime fights, in the movie forum we dont use comic characters we use movie versions even though the comic is the original canon. here thread starter stated anime characters, so we use the anime characters, its only when it isnt stated when we use the original canonand there were ten years between z and gt, plenty of time for vegita t ogrow a moustache, plenty of time to wish someone back to life, and plenty of time for gohan (who pretty much stopped training all together) to forget his earlier training.
and there are multiple superman comics going on at the same time, where one will have him fighting darkseid while another will have him saving another planet with the justice league, just because the movies are hard to piece together doesnt make them non-canon
Originally posted by Kento
What about Nappa and his mustache? Or any of the other saiyans shown even if they aren't canon.I can easily understand nearly all the movies not being canon since they have no place. But the anime has a Garlic Jr. Saga that takes place after Dead Zone making Dead Zone part of the anime..somehow. GT also being said not to be part of the anime is what I don't get. It's specifically made to follow the anime. It may not be canon to the manga but that's really not the point as the anime has stuff non-canon anyway and isn't the real canon so what does it matter if it has more. And Trunks having his sword in GT would make Taipon movie canon to the series also. None of the other movies have anything to connect with the series except those two.
Originally posted by Kento
The difference is that the same people who made the anime made the movies, and GT.
Originally posted by StyleTimeYea I get that. Neko Majin has DB characters in it but it's not canon yet was made by Akira. But there is a big difference in somebody writing fanfiction that takes place after the series, and a studio making an anime that takes place after the series they did and got permission to make. That's what I meant.
I still don't think you two quite get what I saying. If you want to argue that those things are canon, be my guest. I was specifically adressing this logic in my last post.The creative team who made canon material can still make non-canon material. It's this argument specifically that I'm referring to.
Originally posted by StyleTimeit is non-canon to the manga, anime is canon to the anime
I still don't think you two quite get what I saying. If you want to argue that those things are canon, be my guest. I was specifically adressing this logic in my last post.The creative team who made canon material can still make non-canon material. It's this argument specifically that I'm referring to.
ultimate marvel is non-canon t omarvel, but is is canon to the ultmate marvel universe, if the thread statated anime verions we use the anime versions, if someone states the ultimate marvel characters we wouldnt use the regular marvel characters.
Sigh. Comrade, you're on something completely different here. We were specifically referring to Kento's earlier statement insinuating that non-canon material is canon because it was made by the same creative team. Kento agrees and revealed that that wasn't the message he intended to give. You're arguing about something quite dissimilar to the logic we addressed.
Originally posted by StyleTimeregardless anime version of goku should be used unless stated otherwise
Sigh. Comrade, you're on something completely different here. We were specifically referring to Kento's earlier statement insinuating that non-canon material is canon because it was made by the same creative team. Kento agrees and revealed that that wasn't the message he intended to give. You're arguing about something quite dissimilar to the logic we addressed.
anime goku vs. sentry should result in goku taking the majority in my opinion
Originally posted by Kento
Yea I get that. Neko Majin has DB characters in it but it's not canon yet was made by Akira. But there is a big difference in somebody writing fanfiction that takes place after the series, and a studio making an anime that takes place after the series they did and got permission to make. That's what I meant.
Answer this, why when writers create a fight between comic characters people say that its fan based. What makes it so different from any comic book besides it being a non cannon crossover. Do people call it fan based because they dont like the deciding factor of the fight or they call it fan based because they have actual evidence proving that it is.
Originally posted by BradBalboa
As far as i Know Goku Takes it against Sentry !! That whole "powwr of a million exploding suns" has never been fully shown, its not even mentioned on his wikie page, the only real feat i can give sentry is he apparetnyl stalemated Galactus!!But sorry, Goku beats Sentry !!
I totally agree. Goku stomps him.
Originally posted by BradBalboaWait, what? You give him the feat of stalemating Galactus, and still say Goku wins?
As far as i Know Goku Takes it against Sentry !! That whole "powwr of a million exploding suns" has never been fully shown, its not even mentioned on his wikie page, the only real feat i can give sentry is he apparetnyl stalemated Galactus!!But sorry, Goku beats Sentry !!
Granted I think the stalemating Galactus thing is bullshit, but are you now saying Goku>Galactus?
Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Wait, what? You give him the feat of stalemating Galactus, and still say Goku wins?Granted I think the stalemating Galactus thing is bullshit, but are you now saying Goku>Galactus?
I dont think that he is saying that but I do honestly believe he is saying that goku would mud stomp sentry and quite easily (Damn, this is the 1st time I gave someone a win over sentry besides thanos or above characters.)
🙁