1. Understand an analogy. Naga was known and respected among the Sith when he was ready to try for the crown.
2. You know what hpyerbole is?
3. .....you are aware of what happens when a daddy and a mommy Massassi love eachother veeeery much, right?
Once again: in Golden Age of the Sith, we see something different and GAOTS is the actual representation, NOT the Holocron showing it.
In DLOTS, Naga is HUMAN for the love of...
Originally posted by Lightsnake
1. Understand an analogy. Naga was known and respected among the Sith when he was ready to try for the crown.
2. You know what hpyerbole is?
3. .....you are aware of what happens when a daddy and a mommy Massassi love eachother veeeery much, right?Once again: in Golden Age of the Sith, we see something different and GAOTS is the actual representation, NOT the Holocron showing it.
In DLOTS, Naga is HUMAN for the love of...
1. Sigh i said i dropped it about ragnos, why bother talking about naga?
2. yup, but i dont need to argue since you got you ass handed to you by the senior members
3. you said not one was left for hundreds of years
oo yea just because the art is different. Nonetheless, it was still recorded in the holocron and still showed about the amulet.
I wont argue on this, go ahead and argue against canon.
ill be back tmr and i hope you contruct a proper arguement about vodos holocron
2. Your perceptions are irrelevant to this debate. I could remind you how many times I've seen you owned, child.
3. Not one who knew Naga, no.
And the art isn't just different, ti explains the entire scenario, not Vodo's holocron's version of it. It's like reading a news report of something and actually SEEING IT HAPPEN, it's different.
Originally posted by Kadesh
1.) just what the hell are you talking about? this is about ragnos not naga
Ok, and Naga was a complete pussy. Ragnos is an unknown FACE IT, you cant even use him in argument if you want to win it. You're giving us alot of opinions and "what ifs"
Originally posted by Kadesh
2. i dont mind dreaming, you should wake up
Apparently those guys dont cling onto the view that Ancient Sith > All and neither do i.
Originally posted by Kadesh
3.try again, there were massassi when exar arrived
Originally posted by Kadesh
once more in DLOTS
it was the holocron who showed naga using the amulet to trigger a supernova. it was recorded and already had happened, now shut up
Huh, i suppose you dont notice a ship flying in and launching an attack on a star.
Originally posted by LightsnakeYou havnt seen anything, so dont come to assumptions yet
2. Your perceptions are irrelevant to this debate. I could remind you how many times I've seen you owned, child.
Originally posted by Lightsnake3. Not one who knew Naga, no.
[/B]
Originally posted by LightsnakeAnd thats what they did, explain what had happened. Naga only looked like to be a human but is he? no. And it was already recorded he used an amulet to triiger the supernova, now stop
And the art isn't just different, ti explains the entire scenario, not Vodo's holocron's version of it. It's like reading a news report of something and actually SEEING IT HAPPEN, it's different. [/B]
Originally posted by Lightsnake
2. Nor have you, child.
3. Yes, that'll happen in primitive socieites...
3. No, he didn't just LOOK human...he had white skin, no cheek fins and a goatee. And what record? According to weapons and technology AND The Sith War, he used his ship
3b) The holocron, as i said it was recordedalready, Only his physical appearence appread different, nothing else