Imperial_Samura
Anticrust Smurf
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Saying that there is no validity (which anyone can do including a smily) and proving that there is no validity (this is where we separate the men from the boys) is a horse of a different color.
And that is not an argument.
Give me a single reason to think that his claims - which are not accepted by the religious history community - have any validity. It is up to the prosecution to prove the case.
And tell me - is Jack Chick your one stop shop for all your views? You mock me in other threads for demanding a standard of quality from sources, yet everything you use seems to come from a tiny little group orbiting Chick Publications - do you want me to post the question regarding his claims again? Or the reasons why they have been debunked?
It has been said by many why attacks based on the name Allah are not legitimate reasons to strip it of its status as a divinity of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Nor is there any support for the proposition Allah is a moon God.
I can provide some names of Christian scholars who do not accept the claims - would your head explode if I presented a Christian scholar, who hasn't even been accused of academic fraud, who doesn't agree?
Fact remains you are claiming Biblical claims invalidate Allah - include ones erroneously based upon the word "Allah" - which as others have mentioned was even used by Jews because it is the word for God in that language (as opposed to ones derived from the Greek root.)
The Jews don't recognise Jesus as the son of God, and their holy text doesn't acknowledged him, and since they predated both Christianity and Islam maybe Christianity also deserves to be stripped of its status of a religion of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The Bible is not a foundation for your claims, history must be, and history does not support what your are saying. Islam is decended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob just like Christianity and Hebrew are. You can say till the cows come home "buuuuut the Bible says and the Koran doesn't" but that isn't changing anything.