Originally posted by the ninjak
Some said in GotG that soon Thanos would be immune to physical harm.
Maybe MoonDragon.
Gamora stated after she hit him with the Godslayer it broke on him, she sais and I "quote He indistructdable he can't be harm". So he might be on classic Juggernaut level as for durability. Lets wait and see, if so Marvel heroes are in troubled for years to come.
Originally posted by h1a8Superman could hit thanos with his best punch in the face and he would say "are you done yet"?
I need to understand something.Which one(s) are false?
1. Superman hitting at full strength can stun Thanos.
2. Superman is fast enough to hit Thanos before Thanos gets his shields up.
3. Assuming Thanos is stunned by Superman for a small brief moment, Superman is fast enough to restun Thanos before Thanos clears up from the previous stun.
Originally posted by carver9
It wouldnt be safe for Thanos to go fist cuffs with Superman. I'm giving Thanos the majority due to his versatility not his fighting skills.
no no no. Whether Thanos decides to slug it out or use energy blasts the results are still the same. Thanos has more durability, striking power and IMO strength than superman. Thanos would have no issue opening up a can of whoop ass on superman h2h. I mean honestly carver, can't you picture Thanos taking supermans punches and just smiling and pimp slapping him back to the ground?
Originally posted by Omega VisionThier strength can be argued.I mean we all know superman is insanely strong.But thanos has easily smacked out the likes of thor,hulk,drax,and surfer.
Yes. In your opinion.
As for pure strength and punching power I give a slight to supes(assuming the battle is in the sunlight)but thanos is so close I don't think it would make much of a difference.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
no no no. Whether Thanos decides to slug it out or use energy blasts the results are still the same. Thanos has more durability, striking power and IMO strength than superman. Thanos would have no issue opening up a can of whoop ass on superman h2h. I mean honestly carver, can't you picture Thanos taking supermans punches and just smiling and pimp slapping him back to the ground?
LOL, I can picture that but the difference is, Thanos never actually fought anyone H2H with Supermans speed so its kind of different. Superman would land more punches than your regular joe if Thanos decide to go fist cuffs.
I agree, Thanos does have the advantage when it comes to punching power (honestly, I dont agree with lifting feats being used as evidence of punching power) but I dont think it would be a good idea to go fist cuffs with Superman. He might win the fight but in the end he is going to be f***** up.
Originally posted by h1a8
I need to understand something.Which one(s) are false?
1. Superman hitting at full strength can stun Thanos.
2. Superman is fast enough to hit Thanos before Thanos gets his shields up.
3. Assuming Thanos is stunned by Superman for a small brief moment, Superman is fast enough to restun Thanos before Thanos clears up from the previous stun.
2.)Thanos won't need a shield to fight Superman but I don't see why he wouldn't have chance to put up a shield if he he needed one.
3.) No one is fast enough to pull of a stun and re stun on Thanos.
This is not a game lol you make is sound like if a character is fast enough they can own Thanos.... This has never been the case.
This is like me saying Surfer blasts Thanos ... Stuns him and keeps blasting keeping him in a stun lock... and this example works with almost anyway just change the name.
Originally posted by -Pr-
but he won't, unless superman is in the mood to press the attack. which is rare.superman probably could stun thanos. there's no reason to suggest he couldn't. the problem lies in the fact that superman always gives people a chance to surrender after he knocks them down.
Agreed. You make more sense than anyone here. It all depends on Superman's mood.
I think it is on the edge of trolling when people say that Superman can't even bother Thanos with blows though.
Originally posted by kgkg
1.) Superman hitting at full strength can effect Thanos.2.)Thanos won't need a shield to fight Superman but I don't see why he wouldn't have chance to put up a shield if he he needed one.
3.) No one is fast enough to pull of a stun and re stun on Thanos.
This is not a game lol you make is sound like if a character is fast enough they can own Thanos.... This has never been the case.
This is like me saying Surfer blasts Thanos ... Stuns him and keeps blasting keeping him in a stun lock... and this example works with almost anyway just change the name.
2. Prove that he can get the shield up if Superman decided to blitz him at full speed.
3. Well Thanos was fast enough to stun and restun Silver Surfer. Wasn't that a combo to ko? That wasn't a video game as I recalled.
Originally posted by h1a8
2. Prove that he can get the shield up if Superman decided to blitz him at full speed.
Able to stay un-stuned after all this people attack him.
3. Well Thanos was fast enough to stun and restun Silver Surfer. Wasn't that a combo to ko? That wasn't a video game as I recalled.
Originally posted by kgkgThanos was stunned, even for a millisecond. Superman would hit harder, making the stun longer, and a millisecond is an eternity to Superman. Superman can punch literally more than millions of times in a milisecond.
Thanos was stunned there. It was just a small moment. What you don't understand about the combo to ko principle is stipulation 2. It states one must be FAST enough to land another blow before the stun effect wears off, renewing the stun. Once Thor hit Thanos with the hammer he didn't follow up on it in time.Able to stay un-stuned after all this people attack him.
This has been debunked. I've calculated Silver Surfer's best feats and he didn't manage to obtain light speed within the first 3meters of travel. Fallen One hasn't proven to reach light speed either within the first 3meters of travel either. Superman has. Thus the Fallen One feat doesn't prove that Thanos can move significantly in relation to Superman. This is like saying since X can stop a bullet then X can causate to Superman, not realizing that Superman is far faster than a bullet. Superman can appear behind Thanos before he can turn around.
Thanos would almost be a statue to Superman in reality.Ok so Thanos is fast enough to K.O Superman. Good.
Originally posted by h1a8Seem like I'm wasting my time so I will stop right here. 🙂
Thanos was stunned, even for a millisecond. Superman would hit harder, making the stun longer, and a millisecond is an eternity to Superman. Superman can punch literally more than millions of times in a milisecond. Thanos was stunned there. It was just a small moment. What you don't understand about the combo to ko principle is stipulation 2. It states one must be FAST enough to land another blow before the stun effect wears off, renewing the stun. Once Thor hit Thanos with the hammer he didn't follow up on it in time. This has been debunked. I've calculated Silver Surfer's best feats and he didn't manage to obtain light speed within the first 3meters of travel. Fallen One hasn't proven to reach light speed either within the first 3meters of travel either. Superman has. Thus the Fallen One feat doesn't prove that Thanos can move significantly in relation to Superman. This is like saying since X can stop a bullet then X can causate to Superman, not realizing that Superman is far faster than a bullet. Superman can appear behind Thanos before he can turn around. Thanos would almost be a statue to Superman in reality.
