Utrigita: It was Palpatine who destroyed the Jedi. he masterminded their fall completely. And Exar Kun was a loser for the title of Sith'Ari, he's not even close.
Sith'Ari: 'The Sith' could easily apply to the singular, and Plagueis was 'The Sith' at the time. Palpatine destroyed the Sith-his master- and in the process made the sith greater than ever before. The prophecy only implies that the Sith'Ari will one day lead the Sith, not before or after they destroy them...Bane did NOT lead a thing before Kaan's order was gone
'The Sith' could easily apply to the singular, and Plagueis was 'The Sith' at the time. Palpatine destroyed the Sith-his master-
So you seriously want to argue that 'destroy the sith' refers to one individual sith? LOL!
Now don't be ridiculous Lightsnake, if that were the case, it would have been made clear who 'the sith' was in reference to.
The prophecy only implies that the Sith'Ari will one day lead the Sith, not before or after they destroy them...
Wrong, it's pretty clear that the prophecy implies that the Sith'ari would already be leading the sith, do some research!
Bane did NOT lead a thing before Kaan's order was gone
He was leading the sith before destroying them; he was a dark lord in an order where 'all were equals', and he basically was leading the sith in the war when he came to Ruusan; he came back with all these godly ancient sith teachings, was able to completely ignore and disragards Kaan's orders and wishes, and was basically the guy in charge, he even made Kaan his b1tch and had him do just exactly what he wanted.
I can't be arsed to look through KotOR, PoD, or Evil Never Dies right now, but you're wrong. In fact, wookiepedia's article gives a perfect explanation of what the prophecy entails.
Originally posted by LightsnakeI like this possibility.
Utrigita: It was Palpatine who destroyed the Jedi. he masterminded their fall completely. And Exar Kun was a loser for the title of Sith'Ari, he's not even close.Sith'Ari: 'The Sith' could easily apply to the singular, and Plagueis was 'The Sith' at the time. Palpatine destroyed the Sith-his master- and in the process made the sith greater than ever before. The prophecy only implies that the Sith'Ari will one day lead the Sith, not before or after they destroy them...Bane did NOT lead a thing before Kaan's order was gone
Originally posted by Lightsnake
He uses Wookieepedia when his back's to the wall...Somehow your credibility is less than impeccable.
Wookiepedia can be reliable, like most of the time. I've also happened to have heard that stuff from the original source material.
And Bane never led the Sith before their destruction.
He was leading the sith before destroying them; he was a dark lord in an order where 'all were equals', and he basically was leading the sith in the war when he came to Ruusan; he came back with all these godly ancient sith teachings, was able to completely ignore and disregards Kaan's orders and wishes, and was basically the guy in charge, he even made Kaan his b1tch and had him do just exactly what he wanted.
Palpatine at least had the title Dark Lord.
So did Bane you dolt. In fact, he was the one sith that was claiming the title Darth.
Palpatine was still Pleuigis' b1tch - the apprentice. He in no way lead the sith.
I have no assurance you didn't just edit that article to suit your point.
2. What? Bane REJECTED the title and headed off to Lehon in order to study Revan's holocron. He led nothing. He never commanded the Sith....and ignore Kaan's orders and wishes? Sure, that's great...this means he's a renegade, not a leader
3. And again: Bane led as much as Palpatine did. Again: The Sith Apprentice is still A Dark Lord of the Sith. Bane made sure there were only two....face it, Palpatine's a contender
Originally posted by The Sith'ariYou sure are a hypocrite, you kept bitching to people how unrealiable wookie is and now you use it
I can't be arsed to look through KotOR, PoD, or Evil Never Dies right now, but you're wrong. In fact, wookiepedia's article gives a perfect explanation of what the prophecy entails.
Bane never led the Sith except for the instance on Ruusan where Kaan conceded to Bane's plan and all the Sith unified to perform that massive shockwave...but that was the last time, before the Thought Bomb went off.
Palpatine's a contender. He put them in control, something I don't think the Sith ever fully did prior to his bid for power. Bane didn't rule the galaxy, did he?
Hmm, good point. Krayt's Sith really ARE in control...but, then again, I don't consider them really Sith. There's GOTTA be something that exposes them as not the real thing. Not to mention that all their soldiers are absolute fodder. Master Sazen and Shado Vao cut them down like I would cut a piece of cheese for my sandwiche.