Originally posted by Allankles
Did you even read my post correctly. That was in reply to the Exile's question on lightsaber combat, if you don't know the context of the quote don't use it as fulcrum of your argument.Are you too much of a dull wit to recognize the value of context? The Exile asks her about lightsaber combatants in her time as compared to the ancients and Kreia gives the quote you keep referencing. Context dummy, context.
You really ARE an idiot.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Translation: I'm a piss poor debater who constantly gets my ass handed to me but since I'm in a constant state of denial, like other piss poor debaters, i'm going to type some bullshit just to get the last word in.
We've been here before, you remember. 🙄
Get back to me when you've finally reviewed your "debating" in this thread. It seems everyone can reread their posts but you.
Originally posted by Allankles
We've been here before, you remember. 🙄Get back to me when you've finally reviewed your "debating" in this thread. It seems everyone can reread their posts but you.
Why would I go back and read my posts? It's not enough that you're a piss poor debater, that you don't actually have any knowledge of the rules fo debate? You made the assertion that I said something, then shut up and prove it. Don't ask me to go back and waste time arguing with a pissant like you when you make a claim.
Originally posted by Allankles
Address the damn issue. Is the context important or not? Don't just hide behind irrelevant remarks, you think I care if you possess the ability to write 'idiot'? Get the point, or continue being the fool.
And yet the piss poor debating parrot continues. I tell you to quit embarassing yourself, you repeat it back to me. A hilarious trend among the awful debaters on this forum, but please continue getting wtfpwned. It's a daily ritual.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Why would I go back and read my posts? It's not enough that you're a piss poor debater, that you don't actually have any knowledge of the rules fo debate? You made the assertion that I said something, then shut up and prove it. Don't ask me to go back and waste time arguing with a pissant like you when you make a claim.
The evidence exists in the very same thread we are here ranting over. Why the hell should I requote a post I've already quoted on this thread? I've argued over this point in this thread, quoted you on it even as I offered my rebuttal. No need to refresh your sudden memory loss, I don't care to make a point, your post is here on this thread.
Proof?! How idiotic, it was your argument.
And Traya never called Ragnos' power frightening where the hell are you geting these quotes Borbarad? She mentioned that: " he was mighty in body as well as the force." No mention of frightening power. Stop talking out of your ass. The rest of you gibberrish is worthless drivel we've already argued over inccessantly throughout this thread.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
And yet the piss poor debating parrot continues. I tell you to quit embarassing yourself, you repeat it back to me. A hilarious trend among the awful debaters on this forum, but please continue getting wtfpwned. It's a daily ritual.
The great saxy has written, and so it shall be. You make me feel like Hawkin.
Originally posted by Allankles
And Traya never called Ragnos' power frightening where the hell are you geting these quotes Borbarad? She mentioned that: " he possesed great strength in body as well as the force." No mention of frightening power. Stop talking out of your ass. The rest of you gibberrish is worthless drivel we've already argued over inccessantly throughout this thread.
Lmao.
"Tremendous physical strength and a frightening grasp of the dark side" is how Kreia comments Ragnos.
And nice how you dodge the arguments again. Really. Like a spoiled little baby. Pathetic idiot.
Originally posted by Borbarad
Lmao.
"Tremendous physical strength and a frightening grasp of the dark side" is how Kreia comments Ragnos.And nice how you dodge the arguments again. Really. Like a spoiled little baby. Pathetic idiot.
Big fat lie.
She never mentions his grasp of the dark side, you're talking out of your ass.
She mentions that: "a half breed with great might both physically and in the force. .......his death left a great vacuum, a vacuum that was never filled....."
She never ever calls Ragnos power frightening, nor does she talk about his "grasp of the dark side". You're ridiculous.
Originally posted by Borbarad
And nice how you dodge the arguments again. Really. Like a spoiled little baby. Pathetic idiot.
You think I'd dodge any argument from you?
You've made the same mistake Saxy makes, and that's deny the value of feats simply because you don't like that they are in opposition of your opinion. Calling the Exile's victories over Nihilus and Sion worthless etc etc. I mean how do I argue against blunt denial?
Don't flatter yourself.
Plus, we've argued over the same points for about 17 pages, you'd expect me to ignore simple repetitions of previously addressed arguments.
Originally posted by Borbarad
"Tremendous physical strength and a frightening grasp of the dark side" is how Kreia comments Ragnos.
No, here are Kreia's exact words:
"Before you is the tomb of the great Sith Lord Marka Ragnos, a half-breed who possessed tremendous strength, both physical and in the Force."
Unless, I'm mistaken you seem to be confusing what Kreia comments about Marka Ragnos with what is in the Darkside Sourcebook, on page 69:
"Ragnos was a half-breed Sith, a warlord of tremendous physical power and a frightening grasp of the dark side of the Force."
Which is actually a more viable source, anyways. So, who gives a shit if Kreia said it or not, Allankles? It's fact when it comes from tDSSB.
I may have missed Kreia saying that, however. I took down pretty much all the quotes she has to note when you visit the tombs of the Sith Lords of Korriban awhile back.
Originally posted by Gideon
Advent, do you own tDSSB?
Yes, how else do you think I know all these quotes? I'm not omniscient, as hard as that is to believe.
In all honesty, I'm not the one to ask if its 'worth' the purchase. The Darkside Sourcebook gives a general history of the Sith, and has some entries on such Sith, and other various Dark Jedi, or acquaintances. In addition to creatures, what defines a 'dark' character, and such. I really don't bother with it, aside from when I'm in a debate.
Here's the contents page:
If you want to see more, or something like that, just ask. I'm no critic, especially on materials that I haven't bothered to read fully (like the NEC).
Though, I will say that the TotJ Companion sucks, Darth Sexy. It doesn't even cover Exar Kun, or the Ancient Sith at all. It only spans the Freedon Nadd Uprising mostly, with some background information on some characters who were seemingly unknown (like Warb Null), which is boring.
The entry on Darth Sidious talks mostly about his power, and knowledge of the dark side, as well as his political life (and a very brief bit about his plot on the Jedi). It really has no personal history.
The Emperor's biographical summary is much longer compared to the previous one, but essentially doesn't say much that isn't already known. It talks about the power of the Force itself, how he and Darth Vader "rule the galaxy", and focuses on the political aspects of his ways (his scheming, and the like), and the Empire.
I could go to Wookiepedia, and read the same thing to be honest.
