Can you handle the Truth?

Started by The big EH432 pages

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You do not have the authority to take a life as God does. You are comparing sunflower seeds to pumpkins and cornstalks. God has the [B]right to take life you do not. If you had the right to take a life you could murder someone just because and not be punished for it. God takes lives all the time and He has never been arrested and thrown in jail for it. Do you know why? (I think you know why.)

I never claimed to have the right to take life. But if taking life is evil, then it is evil regardless of who does it. So it doesn't matter if a mortal human being or an all powerful deity do it. It's the same action, done by different people.

It's still an evil act (if it is deemed evil in the first place).

But taking life is not evil if God does it. Again, you need to have a shift in your thinking. God is not held to the same constraints that humans or animals are held to. God is above all, His authority transcends all authority. For example, in society the Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in the land. The buck stops with them. With one rap of the gavel they have the power to decide someone's life....Now, back to God. God is superior to the Supreme Court. With one act of His will God has the power to decide the fate of the entire universe....

Do you follow me?

If you can understand the purview (in terms of extent of power) of the Supreme Court then you should see be able to understand God's range, sweep, and scope of divine right and privelege as King and Judge of the universe. It is much more transcendent and lofty than the measly Supreme Court of the United States.

Giving birth and creating life and the planet that that life lives on are totally different. God has created within His creation the capacity to reproduce. Humans do not create life they reproduce life (there is a great difference between the two).

Understood.

But even If I had the power to create life from nothing, what gives me the right to deem this new life to suffering or death? Would it still not be cruelty either way, or would I somehow be exempt from cruelty because of my status as a creator?

Suffering was introduced by Adam and his descendants (i.e. us) not God. God put Adam and Eve in a pristine environment, surrounded by every possible amenity that would secure and maintain their highest good, welfare, benefit, and blessing. Through one man's selfish, foolish, sinful action all of that was lost/forfeited in exchange for death, scarcity, disease, lack, pain, natural disaster, etc. You keep putting the blame in God's court but it belongs in ours. We--just like our great ancestor Adam--continue to sin instead of obeying God. Then we wonder why we keep reaping death, pain, disease, lack, etc.

Or lets put it this way:

If I take organic or inorganic materials, and create an artificial being (let's say like Frankenstein), and this being has feelings, responses, all the possibly human and animal like qualities I can mimic for it.

It's an artificial intelligence, but with emotions and conciousness nonetheless.

Would I somehow have the right to kill or torture the living being, simply because I created it ?

You would have the right to do with your frankenstein whatever you wish just like God. The difference between you and God is that you are not love, righteous, good, loving-kind, by nature so you probably would harm your own creation. God does not do this. But again, God does on occasion move in judgment for the good of all and take life just like in the flood. Here is the thing that gets glossed over and ignored time and time again: people seem fixated on only the moment that God must execute judgment, but compeletly ignore all of the love that He extends repeatedly before moving in judgment.

God's nature is to extend mercy not administer punishiment. But what people do is ignore, spit on, and trample on God's patience and love until He says enough. The last thing that God wants to do is judge you or anyone else but He will eventually. Don't think that just because God is slow to anger that He will fail to do what He must do. All throughout the Scriptures there are accounts after accounts of God sending prophets to warn nations of of their rampant, repeated, shameless sins, and God's impending judgment. Why doesn't God just judge them without protracted, repeated warnings? God is waiting for the sinner to repent and turn to Him just as in our day and time. Why doesn't God just hurl a fire ball towards the earth and end it all? God is long-suffering not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. God doesn't want one sinner to die and go to Hell for eternity. He wants everyone to repent and be saved.

In actuality, people reap what they sow and then blame God for it. They lie, steal, cheat, or give the devil a place in their lives then when something bad happens, they point their boney little finger at God and blame Him for their stupidity. [/B]

okay i'm bak is guy just says to much bullshit for me to take

so let me get this straght i know it was way pages back but your saying that if we follow god and completely obey him in every way we will live forever and never suffer? okay then i gotta ask since i'm assuming you follow god in every way (except ignorance) have you ever suffered?

and did you know that during the years jesus was arround there are only 2 mentions of him by any historians, one of which was proven to be a fake as he wasnt even in the same country as jesus and the other only had one sentance in which it mentons Christus which could be really anyone

Does that mean you feel confident about engaging in a discussion about whether Jesus ever existed?

somewhat although i dont consider anything in the bible as evidence because it was written by people who would gain from it and if jesus isnt real then the bible is fake and visa versa

Originally posted by The big EH
somewhat although i dont consider anything in the bible as evidence because it was written by people who would gain from it and if jesus isnt real then the bible is fake and visa versa
Well, I wouldn't use the Bible to prove Christ's existence. Rome kept careful records of who they executed...that's where I'd check.

It's probably going a bit far to say that if Jesus wasn't real the Bible was fake. Of course it would amount to the same thing. If Jesus wasn't real than the Bible was wrong (or the New Testament was wrong at least), but there is a difference between "wrong" and "fake". Point taken though.

I'm having a harder time swallowing the "and visa versa" statement. Jesus' existence is backed up by the Bible, but if you discredit the Bible you haven't really discreditted the existence of a Christ. It removes much of the evidence for his existence.

The only obvious correction I have for your facts is where you say that the Bible was written by people who would gain from it. I think you mean it was compiled by people who would gain from it. I could name off several writers who died or were tortured for writting what would later be called part of the Bible. But again, point taken. The compilers had questionable intentions.

oh no doubt its no coincidence that the bible itself was basically law for the longest time, and that Vatican and the pope were strong and stern political representives for a long time. i have no doubt in my mind that it was created to rule the people using fear as the ultimate tool. and it's true if anybody were to follow the bible the ery root of that 'faith' is fear, fear of hell mainly but other things to. i know if i was a creator of the universe i would be much more rational and less smiteful than god. although the old saying "power corrupts absolute power corrupts abosultely" would explain god's smitefulness

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqi5F5MqqTQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy0d1HbItOo&NR=1
omg.....what about asians? hatsid di they choose

Originally posted by Quark_666
The only obvious correction I have for your facts is where you say that the Bible was written by people who would gain from it. I think you mean it was compiled by people who would gain from it. I could name off several writers who died or were tortured for writting what would later be called part of the Bible. But again, point taken. The compilers had questionable intentions.

Then again, that then goes for any writer of history before the 20th century. THat means we have to discard all historical writings before official 20th century historical guidelines have been defined. So that doesn't really count.

How did Napoleon say it: "History is the truth agreed upon". Or "History is a lie that nobody contests". Sonmething like that. So if we all agree that Jesus did not live, then I guess that is "history". It doesn't really mean Jesus really was non-existent and proven as such.

As far as I know there is at least one Roman refrence to Jesus' death (Tacitus) but one can wonder if that holds up to the standards of modern hitorical writing as well (what was his source etc.). One can wonder though that if Jesus gained such a sudden and large following that Nero even decided to execute them in the Collosseum, that it was all based on fiction.

In the end, the real question could be: what evidence is there to say he didn't exist? After all, there ARE writings that describe his life. If you discard them for not living up to the standards of modern history writing, then that's basically a weak argument. We might as well discard ALL historical sources predating say... 1950?

Originally posted by The big EH
oh no doubt its no coincidence that the bible itself was basically law for the longest time, and that Vatican and the pope were strong and stern political representives for a long time. i have no doubt in my mind that it was created to rule the people using fear as the ultimate tool. and it's true if anybody were to follow the bible the ery root of that 'faith' is fear, fear of hell mainly but other things to. i know if i was a creator of the universe i would be much more rational and less smiteful than god. although the old saying "power corrupts absolute power corrupts abosultely" would explain god's smitefulness

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqi5F5MqqTQ

You're responding to a point I never made.

Clever.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No. If I do something wrong, there is no forgiveness. I have to live with the Karma I create. So, Christians can go out and "sin' and then get forgiveness. Sounds the other way around to me.

What convinces you that you create karma? If you're an ass to someone, do you have a flat tire the next morning?

Hehehe

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
What convinces you that you create karma? If you're an ass to someone, do you have a flat tire the next morning?

😆

You should read this.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=447678

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
What convinces you that you create karma? If you're an ass to someone, do you have a flat tire the next morning?
Yep, if your an ass to me I'm going to shank your tires 😈 😆

😆

Karma is soooooooo simple..........It's just:

Shiny happy people holding hands
Shiny happy people holding hands
Shiny happy people laughing

B-52's

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆

You should read this.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=447678

That didn't tell me anything new, because I already know the concept of karma. My question was what has you convinced that it exists.

And converting from one religion to another because the new one has all the pros but none of the cons is pretty superficial.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
That didn't tell me anything new, because I already know the concept of karma. My question was what has you convinced that it exists.

And converting from one religion to another because the new one has all the pros but none of the cons is pretty superficial.

It is not superficial to me. Just because I convey something in simple terms does not mean it is simple.

First of all, Karma makes sense to me. I see how it tells a story about my life, and why I am here. However, to answer the core of your question: I have faith that Karma is real.

But past lives may have screwed up everything in this life...

Originally posted by queeq
But past lives may have screwed up everything in this life...

Simultaneous Incarnation = Other lives are screwing up everything in this life. 😆

Originally posted by queeq
But past lives may have screwed up everything in this life...
Blame it on Buddha 😠

He's not fair. I say we picket!!