Originally posted by TRH
they did it to commemorate him on his birthday
If not hitler they would have found someone else to express their hatred towards the system. i wil never buy that the massacre took place for hitler, the kids were nutjobs unable to deal. Had hitler never existed, the psychology which pushed them over the edge would still have occured. Thats almost like saying the video game doom was responsible for their terrible marksmenship because that was one of the games they played to practice killing
Originally posted by TRH
every religion has extremists,it wasn't random....columbine was for Hitler by the way
yeah sure. without knowing about hitler, the columbine attacks wouldnt have happened. just peachy and grand that theory is. it was for hitler and marilyn manson....and whomever tailored their trenchcoats
Originally posted by ragesRemorsebelive what you want i dont give a ****
If not hitler they would have found someone else to express their hatred towards the system. i wil never buy that the massacre took place for hitler, the kids were nutjobs unable to deal. Had hitler never existed, the psychology which pushed them over the edge would still have occured. Thats almost like saying the video game doom was responsible for their terrible marksmenship because that was one of the games they played to practice killing
Originally posted by ragesRemorseHarris was a nutjob, Klebold was just a pathetic little boy, who just went along with him.
If not hitler they would have found someone else to express their hatred towards the system. i wil never buy that the massacre took place for hitler, the kids were nutjobs unable to deal. Had hitler never existed, the psychology which pushed them over the edge would still have occured. Thats almost like saying the video game doom was responsible for their terrible marksmenship because that was one of the games they played to practice killing
is it just me? everytime there is a major race issue in our country, within 3 days to a week of a major race issue, some white guy does something horrible to the rest of the white community, isn't it just ironic? evens the playing field doesn't it?
pay attention to the next "major" race issue, and see what happens in the news or what they "discover" some white guy doing to the white community shortly afterward.
Could someone please explain to me the need to defend the "right to bear arms" as if it's an actual fundamental human right. Especially considering that the manner in which it's framed (i.e. "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."😉 doesn't unambiguously translate into an individual right to own a gun anyway.
And if I call it a silly "right", which I believe it to be, I somehow am affronting the American populace.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Could someone please explain to me the need to defend the "right to bear arms" as if it's an actual fundamental human right. Especially considering that the manner in which it's framed (i.e. "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."😉 doesn't unambiguously translate into an individual right to own a gun anyway.And if I call it a silly "right", which I believe it to be, I somehow am affronting the American populace.
well, just go in the bullet proof vest business and get some fashion designer to make an abrocomie and fitch cataloge for the college-bound.
Originally posted by Schecter
well, you can flip this debate to its extreme end on either side.if everyone there had a gun, far less people would have died there. 🙄
yup, that's my logic, and i do believe in the right to bare arms, people get motivated to use their brain when they think someone will put up a formidable defense, and somehow, they will either stop or find a weaker victim, but rarely will they still continue in the path of resistance.
Originally posted by Schecter
i was being facetious ffs.
no dah, but the fact still remains, people who do this kind of stuff know that they can get away with murder, it's really sickening and i really thought about getting a license to carry one on me at all times just in case someone goes nutty and thinks someone else doesn't have a form of defense, this stuff has to stop, i wish he left a note, why don't they show his picture?
Originally posted by xmarksthespotYou're right, there is precedence in the fact that the right guarantees the ability to bear arms for the state against the country, as well outside forces. But in Lambert's version of it, there's a comma between militia and being, making the second clause more pronounced, and changing the "right" drastically.
Could someone please explain to me the need to defend the "right to bear arms" as if it's an actual fundamental human right. Especially considering that the manner in which it's framed (i.e. "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."😉 doesn't unambiguously translate into an individual right to own a gun anyway.And if I call it a silly "right", which I believe it to be, I somehow am affronting the American populace.