Originally posted by redhotrash
wow Carver, I feel bad that you spent all that time disputing a point that was never made. The only reason I compared Hulk to Wolverine is because someone commented earlier that "Hulk > Namor" which isnt the case. Maybe before you decide to "teach me" you should learn to understand the original message.
Also if a Deer, a baton, or a rock wielding imp can take Wolverine down I really dont think Namor's punch wouldnt also be effective. Namor might bleed, but Wolverine would sleep.
sigh... and this is why I hate out of context single frames for the most part.
Okay first off.. all of these are low showings.....
but that said:
the deer - it's debateable as to if wolverine was even KOed... as his apprintice sprinted to a jeep from the incident that was some 40 yards away and Wolverine beat him to it by the time he got there.
the baton - I'm not sure what you're reffering to but I think it might be the DD pick... this is completely attributed to the bias of the writer who has an admitted distaste for "goofy superpowered heroes". Ennis wrote that completely to meet up with his own percieved nonsense instead of how the characters should be represented and he admitted it. 😐
the imp - No excuses... it was just a low showing...
as for your last statement... oh really? What If I showed you multiple pictures of namor's punches doing nothing to wolverine but making him angry and getting shrugged off? Would that make a difference to your scewed opinion?