Borbarad
Advocatus Diaboli
Lightsaber mastery, no, force knowledge, ancient sith knowledge, etc, superior to Kun's. Nobody stated that Revan knew sith magic and sith alchemy.
Oh really ? You want to use POD as source and then consequently ignore it ? "And there was far more than just the ancient practices of dark side sorcerers stored inside the Holocron." WTF ? Dark Side sorcerers whose techniques were stored in Revan's holocron. I'm glad that he didn't use Sith magic which would be what Sith sorcerers actually do.
And before you actually come up with anything on this:
http://www.swtimeline.ru/?comics=7&page=010
"...for Sith Sorcerer Naga Sadow..."
Ups ? OWNED. Anything else you want to tell me ?
And there was more than that in the holocron, yes. Something that is just called "understanding of the Dark Side". I wonder what that should be especially since that "most terrible" stuff that Bane wouldn't use was the stuff those Ancient Sith Sorcereres (*hint* Sadow ! *hint*) left behind.
This is coming from the dumbass that has to completely twist facts around in order to tell himself he knows what he's talking about and he's winning a debate. Good job urkel, you're mediocre.
Yay...let's see. As the source material completely owns you, you might be better off keeping your mouth shut when wanting to accuse people of "twisting facts". I'm mediocre ? Excuse me, Darth Sexy. Are you still suffering from the illusions that you can debate or have the slightest bit of knowledge about the things you want to discuss ? In reality it seems so that this isn't the case.
But of course I'm mediocre compared to you. You are far ahead of me. Of course that's only the case because I'm already about to outstrip you on the debate race track.
Well lets see, I'm creaming you in a debate, you're starting to make shit up and alter facts, so what does that say about your intelligence when compared to a "lobotomized monkey"? Go back to the drawing board urkel, you're killing yourself here.
Yes. Everybody can see the proof for somebody "altering facts" and "making shit up" here. Seems to be you. Or how can it be that I litter the place with sources why you, so far, came up with...urm...nothing to substantiate your claims, not to mention that the source material did proof that you were telling lies here ? Damn. I have to change the comparison. A pile of shit from said monkey would be smarter than you.
No, I think I did a good job attacking your factual points(very rare in your argument), and your distorted ones(99% of the other crap).
No. You just tried to argue the source material and failed.
Wtf does "One of the greatest ones" means? Oh wait it's Nadd's wonderful opinion who lived for a total of... 50 years? So CLEARLY you don't KNOW what he's talking about, and CLEARLY it has nothing to do with the 21,000 years of Jedi history. Shut up. Nor did Nadd know the powers that Ragnos had, seeing as how Ragnos was >>>>>>>>>>>>to Sadow. Ragnos stated Kun was on his own level? Gee, from now on i'm going to count how much bullshit you can add in a"Debate", if you even call what you wrote that.
Right. Double-standarts again. The Revan Fanboy connection is handing in the opinion of all kind of force using dickheads that gave testament to Revan's power. That is the uber proof for Revans force skills.
The opinion of somebody who did experience one ancient Sith, had contact to another Ancient Sith at least (seen on Korriban where one of them tells Nadd that Kun is ready now) and has been around in actual form and spirit form for more than 400 years of course doesn't matter.
Really. The complete dialogue from the comic goes like that:
Nadd: Greetings, Jedi.
Ulic: Freedon Nadd!
Nadd: I am here to warn you... you must not interfere with the work of the Dark Side. The Sith are destined to rise again. Nothing can prevent that.
Ulic: You talk big for a spirit. I thought Arca drove you away.
Nadd: Arca cannot interfere with the dead... Nor can he help you, poor Jedi, to avoid your destiny.
Ulic: What are you talking about?
Nadd: You will be one of the great ones-- and there is another even greater than you.
What do you think is "one of the great ones" refering to as Nadd is speaking about the power of the Dark Side and the new rise of the Sith ? Of course he's calling Ulic one of the great ones (refering to the Sith up to that point) just to call Exar Kun "even greater" in the very same sentence.
And Ragnos ?
"You are the chosen..."
"You may bring to pass the great destiny foretold..."
"You have rightly earned the title Dark Lord of the Sith..."
"We now secure the future when the Sith take their revenge..."
Yadda, yadda, yadda. By the comment that Kun has "rightly earned" the title Dark Lord of the Sith, Ragnos puts him on his own level.
And back to square one with the imbecile..
Kun's knowledge comes from Sadow and ONLY Sadow
Revan's knowledge came from Korriban, AND Malachor V, where Nihilus and Traya learned their drain.
Revan>Kun in knowledge. Sorry big boy.
Indeed. You're back to square one, imbecile.
Kun's knowledge consisted of: Things Vodo told him, things Nadd told him (who was in possession of the most precious source of Ancient Sith knowledge - Adas holocron), everything Sadow left behind (another Ancient Sith), things he found on Ossus (he came to that planet twice), the scrolls he found in Nadd's tomb (ok...also Sadow's work most likely).
And are you once again sighting the f*cking planet-size graveyard and that nice Sith school where Kreia and Revan (supposed) learned that uber force drain that Kun used multiple times ?
Sorry, kid. The size of the knowledge source doesn't influence the amount of knowledge and the value of the knowledge stored there. You again just came up with that graveyard planet where we never saw any "knowledge" being found and Malachor V were the knowledge is limited to basical Sith teachings + the force drain. WTF ?
Awww if I ever took logical reasoning class and if I was a boring pseudointellectual like you morons on that other forum, I'd be inclined to get a woodie by pointing out your various fallacies. Tell me urkel, where did I EVER imply that Revan was on the level of Ragnos? Where did I EVER imply that Revan would have achieved more sith knowledge? Sorry, I never said that, learn to read dumbshit. Palpatine is the ONLY one with more sith knowledge, everybody knows this. And again, Ragnos never put Kun on his level..
You are aware of the funny fact that you can put "Sadow" here instead of "Ragnos" and the result would still be the same ? Namely that Kreia, who had her ass on Malachor for several years, still considered herself a child compared to the Ancient Sith Lords. This talking about people including Sadow ? Even if Kun only got Sadow's entire knowledge that "only", as it seems, puts him above Kreia and Revan already.
And thanks. I'm aware that "logical reasoning" is a totally foreign field for you. You don't have to point that out.
"Have you come to take Lord Vader's place"? Oh right, after he said Vader was dead, they said "stay here". I guess your incessant fact distorting argument is shot down again. Not to mention you don't even know if that was Ragnos.
http://www.swtimeline.ru/?comics=126&page=175
I guess you're not capable of reading properly. Much less capable of actually using common sense. They have a placed reserved for Vader ? How can that be if they didn't at least grant Vader the title Dark Lord of the Sith ? Ups. Aside of that "How can one who has ruled only a few decades can command those who held dominion for centuries" ? Notice that the only Sith Lord known to have ruled for over a century was...Ragnos. Talked yourself into the next dead end, eh ?
Lets see, another quote to debunk your pathetic argument.
"After the Jedi Civil War, barely a hundred jedi remained". Yep, your pathetic attempts to discredit Revan with more bullshit, are pretty sad. I'm glad Nihilus and Sion killed a few jedi, maybe you can give them a high five in your wet dreams. I don't care what you "DOUBT", it's what was stated. Shut up, you lose tool.
Uh. Yes. I was descrediting Revan. Once again: Do I doubt that Revan is powerful ? No. Do I doubt that he's a military genious ? No. Do I doubt that he's capable of taking "the darkest power in the Galaxy" in a one on one situation ? Yes.
We can keep arguing about Revan's archievements again and again. Did he personally, with his own power, take all that Jedi down ? Nope. Does it matter then ? Nope. Did Revan with his own power and nothing else conquer the Republic. Nope. Does it matter then ? Nope.
Got it now ? Anything that can not be attributed to Revan's lightsaber skills or force knowledge directly is worthless for this debate. Unless you assume he's going to kill Kun by floating him with droids and ships from the Star Forge or he takes some HK droid out of his packet to assassinate Kun.
And if you want to go by archievements. Six months after taking the path down to the Dark Side Kun and Ulic almost had the complete Republic's fleet destroyed, and had a superweapon capable of bringing the end of the Republic - designed by Kun. I wonder what they would have without being betrayed and adding another 1.5 years of kicking the living shit out of the Republic and "spreading death on a genocidal level". Hmm...