Superman vs Mangog

Started by h1a853 pages

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
from www.newworldencyclopedia.org

escape velocity = 11.2km/s or 6.96m/s neglecting air resistance

6.96m/s roughly = to 25,000m/hr
11.2km/s roughly = to 40,000km/hr

from www.physlink.com

escape velocity = 11.1km/s neglecting air resistance

11.1km/s roughly = to 40,000km/hr

either these guys are lying or your making things up

I believe these guys are wrong. If not then the Earth has more mass and a different radius than what some sources are saying. They could be right though. I'll check. I haven't did a neglect wind resistance find the Earth's escape velocity in a while though. I could have sworn it was 17, 000 miles per hour though. Maybe I'm mixing that number up with something else.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
that's a double standard, you can't just give superman's "infinite magic book" (with help i must add) lifting feat a pass and say thor's feat where a kronan used a scientific devise to simulate "infinite weight" is bs.

if the two weights were equal (cause nobody knows just how much stress these two feats placed the heroes under), it'dbe fair to assume thor's was more "impressive" since it was on his lonesome.

I don't except that feat nor any feat that has Superman lifting infinite force, for it is false and leads to contradictions galore. Thus there is no double standard.

k, so who says the book weighed more than what thor went through?

another parallel is the maggedon gear, thor has the god engine feat.

and yet another is the earth tow (1/3), thor has the jormangand tow (whom was gripping the earth in restraint)

this doesn't make superman any better than thor against mangog who pretty much walked all over thor multiple times. you are also neglectig thor's power output which mangog ignored (until thor got desperate)

can superman even replicate that? .........don't answer that one.

Originally posted by h1a8
I believe these guys are wrong. If not then the Earth has more mass and a different radius than what some sources are saying. They could be right though. I'll check. I haven't did a neglect wind resistance find the Earth's escape velocity in a while though. I could have sworn it was 17, 000 miles per hour though. Maybe I'm mixing that number up with something else.

those two sites were only 2 of about 5 sites i found indicating that escape velocity, neglecting air resistance was around the 11kmish/s value. they can't all be wrong now can they?

to be fair, the first site did mention that at 9,000km altitude or "in space" escape velocity is slightly lower than 7.1km/s which is roughly around 16000km/hr...

Originally posted by h1a8
True True but this is the wrong equation of 'a' to use since we don't know time and do know the distance of acceleration (not what you think). We must use a= (Vf^2 -Vi^2)/(2d) where d is the distance Superman's arms accelerate in the delivery the blow. Vf is the final velocity obtained at the end of the punch swing and Vi is the initial velocity at the beginning of the swing (which is 0). Now this is a collision/momentum problem which proves that it takes even more force so we neglect it and assume that it took Superman about 2 meters to accelerate Lobo to escape velocity (I guess your 11 100m/s).
So F=ma
= m(Vf^2-Vi^2)/(2d)

= 725.75kg(11,100^2m^2/s^2-0)/(2*2m)

= 22 354 914 375N

=2 512 792tons of force (So in the millions of tons)

But adding in air resistance and the fact that Lobo went through two thick and highly durable metal walls makes the feat totally astronomical.

i wont contradict your computation as the formula is sound and your assumption for d is, imo feasible, the only problem i have with this is that you just computed the force of the punch that superman delivered to lobo.

the force of superman's punch is not necessarily the force needed for a body of 1600lbs to escape the earths gravitational pull and reach escape velocity

i just showed the minimum force needed for a body of 1600lbs to reach escape velocity in 1 second

your's on the other hand showed the minimum force delivered by superman's punch

i hope you see the difference.

Originally posted by h1a8
These things never happened. It is fantasy. That means the only thing that exists is what the writer portrayed or the stuff that can be deduced from this portrayal. Saying that there could have been unknown variables present is false since they aren't portrayed, mentioned, or can be deduced. Even so, F=MA is always true no matter what is going on. That is because it takes A FORCE to accelerate any massive object. F=MA is the minimum of the force. Think about it. Can someone accelerate an object without using any force on it?
Originally posted by h1a8
If I'm wrong then I challenge you to make up an mysterious variable (or force) that shows that it took less than MA to move the planet. Explain the variable or force carefully and use good reason to show that it is possible to move a planet at acceleration A using less than MA force on it.

Sigh. Still not getting it... This will be the last time I'm gonna state this:

The fact that you CANNOT prove what forces the GL ring or the lasso affected or if these very forces were the same forces that would create a considerable amount of resistance to quantify the feat makes this feat inadmissible. Thing is neither one of us can prove anything and in any court case, being unable to prove the reliability of evidence makes it inadmissible.

Stop throwing out made up numbers. You have to PROVE that you can specify w/c forces were negated to allow the feat to even be quantifiable.

I'm not arguing about Mangog vs Thor, just the admissibility of the planet moving feat and the viability of your numbers.

Originally posted by h1a8
It is not common sense. Who knows what the properties of that ground was. What is common sense is that no destructible surface is able to hold infinite weight.

The thing is that the alien's comment leads to a contradiction. Superman's comment doesn't. Now if it didn't then it is ok to take what the alien said as the truth.

I wasn't trying to prove the validity of the Thor feat, only the flaw of your logic. You stated "artist/writer intention" as the primary determinant of viability of a feat. You cannot prove that the weapon didn't affect the ground that they were standing on (the same way you can't prove w/c forces specifically was affected by the lasso/GL ring) and if we go by "artist/writer intention" then we will need to use that logic (flawed as it is) to simply explain how the scene went as it seemed that the writer wanted to portray Thor to be struggling against infinite weight.

Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman was in team (as in the pulling) then how would he feel Starbreaker's pull vs. just feeling the plain inertial resistance of the Earth?

The fact that he knows Starbreaker was pulling and that he was struggling against it?

Besides, his comment was: "I know! I can feel it! It's as if Starbreaker's pull was getting stronger somehow"

There was nothing in this comment that stated that he was struggling against Earth AND Starbreaker's pull. In fact, the way it was written, it almost seemed like he was only struggling against Starbreaker as he made no mention about struggling against the Earth's weight at all.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
k, so who says the book weighed more than what thor went through?

another parallel is the maggedon gear, thor has the god engine feat.

and yet another is the earth tow (1/3), thor has the jormangand tow (whom was gripping the earth in restraint)

this doesn't make superman any better than thor against mangog who pretty much walked all over thor multiple times. you are also neglectig thor's power output which mangog ignored (until thor got desperate)

can superman even replicate that? .........don't answer that one.

Unquantifiable feats with no known lower bound can't be used to gage strength. Thor's god engine feat has no known lower bound and thus can't be used as any gage in his strength. Superman's Mageddon feat can.

Thor never lifted the entire Serpent. The first time the majority of it (if not all) was in ghostly form. The second time, Thor only to manage to get a portion of it off the ground.

So Thor is still more than billions of times weaker than Superman by quantifiable feats.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
i wont contradict your computation as the formula is sound and your assumption for d is, imo feasible, the only problem i have with this is that you just computed the force of the punch that superman delivered to lobo.

the force of superman's punch is not necessarily the force needed for a body of 1600lbs to escape the earths gravitational pull and reach escape velocity

i just showed the minimum force needed for a body of 1600lbs to reach escape velocity in 1 second

your's on the other hand showed the minimum force delivered by superman's punch

i hope you see the difference.

You did voodoo physics. I didn't want to tell you as I didn't want to discourage you. But projectiles don't speed up as they travel away, they slow down. That is to say, projections have negative acceleration. So the notion of a projectile having positive acceleration is nonsense. So how can Lobo reach escape velocity in 1 sec when he already gains the escape velocity upon impact of the punch (in 0 seconds)?

Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Sigh. Still not getting it... This will be the last time I'm gonna state this:

The fact that you CANNOT prove what forces the GL ring or the lasso affected or if these very forces were the same forces that would create a considerable amount of resistance to quantify the feat makes this feat inadmissible. Thing is neither one of us can prove anything and in any court case, being unable to prove the reliability of evidence makes it inadmissible.

Stop being super dense okay. You obviously don't know what you are talking about. That is why I gave you the challenge. But instead of even taking the challenge to prove me wrong you go and say the same dumb crap again. Go figure. MAKE UP AN IMAGINABLE FORCE OR VARIABLE THAT SHOWS THAT IT COULD HAVE TAKEN LESS THAN MA TO MOVE THE PLANET EARTH!!! Sometimes the only way someone can understand is through an example. So give me one.


I wasn't trying to prove the validity of the Thor feat, only the flaw of your logic. You stated "artist/writer intention" as the primary determinant of viability of a feat. You cannot prove that the weapon didn't affect the ground that they were standing on (the same way you can't prove w/c forces specifically was affected by the lasso/GL ring) and if we go by "artist/writer intention" then we will need to use that logic (flawed as it is) to simply explain how the scene went as it seemed that the writer wanted to portray Thor to be struggling against infinite weight.
Hyperbole is a known device in comics. It is used to exaggerate things. The alien comments lead to a contradiction and thus can't be accepted no matter what. The ground wasn't the only problem. But the fact that Thor already is known and proven not to have infinite strength. If two or more things destroy an argument then discrediting only one of them still doesn't help your case.


The fact that he knows Starbreaker was pulling and that he was struggling against it?

Besides, his comment was: "I know! I can feel it! It's as if Starbreaker's pull was getting stronger somehow"

There was nothing in this comment that stated that he was struggling against Earth AND Starbreaker's pull. In fact, the way it was written, it almost seemed like he was only struggling against Starbreaker as he made no mention about struggling against the Earth's weight at all.

How can you pull a fcking Earth with no force? Have you ever heard of inertia? Clearly Superman was pulling both the Earth solo (which takes astronomical force) and against Starbreaker's force.

Originally posted by h1a8
You did voodoo physics. I didn't want to tell you as I didn't want to discourage you. But projectiles don't speed up as they travel away, they slow down. That is to say, projections have negative acceleration. So the notion of a projectile having positive acceleration is nonsense. So how can Lobo reach escape velocity in 1 sec when he already gains the escape velocity upon impact of the punch (in 0 seconds)?

edit: copy pasted this from somewhere...voodoo physics? projectiles? i was talking something aching to rockets and not just projeciles

Physics Concepts

Let's have a look at how you can use Newton's Second Law to figure out how fast your rocket will go. First we need to understand

* Velocity
* Acceleration
* Force

then we'll put them together to find your rocket's speed.

If you are already familiar with these concepts you may want to go on to the Applied Physics page, where I show how to use these equations to find the right motor for your rocket.

You might notice that we make all our measurements here using the metric system. That's because the metric system is designed for all the equations to work without any conversion factors just to fix the funny units. If we measure in English units, feet and inches and pounds, then there are fudge factors all over the place... very confusing.

Velocity

This is the measure of your speed, defined as the distance covered each second, or each minute, or each hour. In equation form, then, you can find the distance you've covered by multiplying the velocity at which you're travelling by the time you're going at that speed:

Distance = velocity x time

or in short form,

s = v x t

Example:
Toy car rolling at 2 meters per second -
After the car has gone
1 second 2 meters
2 seconds 4 meters
3 seconds 6 meters
4 seconds 8 meters

Acceleration

But now what if your velocity is changing, like when you're rocket's engine is burning and the rocket is rapidly speeding up? How do you measure how you're speeding up?

The term for this is acceleration, and the measure is to figure out how much faster you're going after each second (or after each minute or hour). If it takes my car 10 seconds to go from 0 to 60 miles per hour, then my acceleration is 6 miles per hour each second - we would say 6 miles per hour per second.

If I measure velocity in meters per second instead of miles per hour, then acceleration is in meters per second per second. It sounds funny but that's how you say it.

So now if I know my acceleration and how long I accelerate, I can find my velocity (speed) by multiplying the acceleration times the time, or in equation form,

Velocity = acceleration x time

or in short form,

v = a x t

Example:
Car accelerating at 5 meters per second per second -
After the car is going
1 second 5 meters per second
2 seconds 10 meters per second
3 seconds 15 meters per second
4 seconds 20 meters per second

Note: 1 meter per second (m/s) equals 2.237 miles per hour.

Force

Newton's Second Law:

Force = mass x acceleration, or

F = m x a (sometimes written F = ma)

You usually think of force in pounds - in the metric system force is measured in "Newtons", yes, named after Sir Isaac. A Newton is not a lot of force - one pound is 4.45 Newtons.

Example:
Pushing a 0.25 kilogram rocket -
Motor's thrust rocket's acceleration
1 newton 4 meters/sec/sec
2 newtons 8 meters/sec/sec
3 newtons 12 meters/sec/sec
4 newtons 16 meters/sec/sec

So What?

So now you can find the speed your rocket will go:

If I know the force applied to the rocket, and the mass of the rocket, I can use Newton's second law to find the acceleration.

Once I know my acceleration and how long I accelerate, I can find velocity (v = a x t).

The force, of course, is the rocket's thrust as given by the motor spec. We find the burn time by dividing the impulse by the thrust, as described on the NAR Rocket Motor Coding web page.

Example:

My rocket weighs 3.5 ounces = 0.1 kg.
Note: 1 kilogram equals 35.27 ounces

If we use a "C5" motor, it will have a thrust of 5 Newtons for 2 seconds, according to its specifications.

That's all we need to know! Putting it all together, we have:

F = 5 newtons

m = 0.1 kg

t = 2 seconds

F = m x a, therefore 5 = 0.1 x a, so a = 50 meters/sec/sec

v = a x t = 50 x 2 = 100 meters/second = 223.7 mph!

...and you won't get a ticket! Some of the faster model rockets will get up to 300 mph and even more, so this speed is actually pretty typical.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
pretty old, his most recent and last appearance i think was when RKT used is rune magic on mangog turning him to nothingness.

anyway, here's the next part. i'll post the rest of the arc once i finish uploading.

http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5420/thor15618.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8777/thor15601.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8744/thor15602.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2414/thor15603.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8821/thor15604m.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1461/thor15605.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/9881/thor15608.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/3237/thor15609.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8590/thor15610.jpg
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/9184/thor15611.jpg
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3488/thor15615.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/4154/thor15616.jpg
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/6689/thor15617.jpg

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
here's the rest of this fight

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7122/thor15719.jpg
http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/5159/thor15702j.jpg
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/8452/thor15705.jpg
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/7365/thor15706.jpg
http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/8174/thor15707.jpg
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5558/thor15708.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/2012/thor15709.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/8384/thor15710.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/3392/thor15711.jpg
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5850/thor15712.jpg
http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/2492/thor15715.jpg
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/8087/thor15716.jpg
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/6066/thor15717.jpg
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6972/thor15718.jpg

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
here's mangog's next appearance

http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/5980/thor19818.jpg
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7597/thor19512.jpg
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6982/thor19513.jpg
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/9572/thor19718.jpg
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7991/thor19719.jpg
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3708/thor19720.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/6825/thor19721.jpg
http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/4408/thor19800fc.jpg
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2880/thor19801.jpg
http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/6672/thor19802.jpg
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/1522/thor19803.jpg
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/8065/thor19804.jpg
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6125/thor19805.jpg
http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/3843/thor19806.jpg
http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/5267/thor19807.jpg
http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/4368/thor19808.jpg
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/3301/thor19809.jpg
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7263/thor19814.jpg
http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/4809/thor19815.jpg
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2702/thor19816.jpg
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3017/thor19817.jpg

much appreciated 👆

i'll have a looksee and then make a decision.

Originally posted by -Pr-
much appreciated 👆

i'll have a looksee and then make a decision.

no prob..i'll post the issues that kris blaze mentioned ( well, just issue 250 as issue 249 just has mangog looking like odin, which i can also post if you like) once my crappy connection finishes uploading to imageshack.

edit: which could take anywhere from 10-20min if i'm lucky or if its really sucky probably sometime tomorrow 😛

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
no prob..i'll post the issues that kris blaze mentioned ( well, just issue 250 as issue 249 just has mangog looking like odin, which i can also post if you like) once my crappy connection finishes uploading to imageshack.

edit: which could take anywhere from 10-20min if i'm lucky or if its really sucky probably sometime tomorrow 😛

no rush.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Because they are canon to his character. You don't read Thor anyways.

I do, but the fact I you don't understand that there is difference between the 70 and the present shows how much you need it to prove you point.

maybe I should use Legion of SH since it's cannon to the story??

Originally posted by xJLxKing
I do, but the fact I you don't understand that there is difference between the 70 and the present shows how much you need it to prove you point.

maybe I should use Legion of SH since it's cannon to the story??


There is no difference between the 70s and now unless specifically stated 😐

Nobody's preventing you from using old feats, they've just been erased in Superman's history. Let me know when someone rewrites Thor's 40 years and I'll stop using his old feats. Until then, it's completely laughable to compare the two cases.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
There is no difference between the 70s and now unless specifically stated 😐

Nobody's preventing you from using old feats, they've just been erased in Superman's history. Let me know when someone rewrites Thor's 40 years and I'll stop using his old feats. Until then, it's completely laughable to compare the two cases.


PC legion of SH is okay to use now thanks to Superman Origins. Same can be said for PC GL feat.

As for you statement. There doesn't have to be a direct statement for you to accept that a character got weaker after a few decades.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
PC legion of SH is okay to use now thanks to Superman Origins. Same can be said for PC GL feat.

As for you statement. There doesn't have to be a direct statement for you to accept that a character got weaker after a few decades.


I never stopped anyone from using PC green lantern feats, nor do I see the relevance for that in this thread. Superman's origin tales let us know that he interacted with the legion, not that every single PC event with them ever occurred. Completely different things.

No, there has to be. Specifically assuming that a character grows weaker is just plain ridiculous.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Specifically assuming that a character grows weaker is just plain ridiculous.
its not assuming if you're going by their more recent feats.

Originally posted by Starscream M
its not assuming if you're going by their more recent feats.

Why don't you sit quietly and think about how stupid that statement was. Then look up what "to assume" actually means.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Why don't you sit quietly and think about how stupid that statement was. Then look up what "to assume" actually means.
ohmygod, you're ridiculous

so unless a writer directly spells it out for ya, you'd never accept a character being weaker than previous even if his feats indicate?

wow.