Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
If he couldn't limit himself, how could you say he's omnipotent when there's he cannot do something I.E. limit himself. He has to be able to do anything to be omnipotent, and that includes being able to limit himself.
Originally posted by darthgoober
But the stipulation isn't that he chooses to lift it, it's that he's unable to lift it without a limitation(that got lost somewhere along the way).
If you're going to debate the whole omnipotence paradox, the only way for a being to be truly omnipotent is to be supralogical, so they could create a rock too heavy to lift and then lift it anyway, because they defy logic. But if they can defy logic, that makes debating or discussing them completely impossible and pointless in the first place.
Originally posted by Endless Mike
If you're going to debate the whole omnipotence paradox, the only way for a being to be truly omnipotent is to be supralogical, so they could create a rock too heavy to lift and then lift it anyway, because they defy logic. But if they can defy logic, that makes debating or discussing them completely impossible and pointless in the first place.
Originally posted by darthgoober
They don't have to for us to debate them. They establish the rules that their characters operate under, and we discuss them within that framework.
I know that. . .but, realistically when it comes to omnipotent character vs omnipotent character there should be no winner.
Originally posted by darthgoober
I never said it made sense, I just said that it IS that way.
I never accused you of saying that.