because what will they gain from the knowledge of sexual acts at the time anyway?
it is retarded to expose kids so young to concepts so complicated. people and threads like these and the many littering kmc are proof enough of the way the idea of sex facinates and befuddles masses of fully grown sexually active adults. how on earth would a 5 year old make exposure to sex a worthwhile experience?
Originally posted by Punkyhermy
because what will they gain from the knowledge of sexual acts at the time anyway?it is retarded to expose kids so young to concepts so complicated. people and threads like these and the many littering kmc are proof enough of the way the idea of sex facinates and befuddles masses of fully grown sexually active adults. how on earth would a 5 year old make exposure to sex a worthwhile experience?
It's retarded to assume the point is to make them have a worthwhile experience.
Saying something so simple as "The man puts his ding dong in the woman's...whatever and..." etc is all that's needed. It doesn't need to be graphic, it can even be dulled down, but the jizz-t of it is the same.
If you are gonna suggest people wait until their kids are older they're just gonna learn in school, come home and ask and the parents are gonna get more embarassed.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauriyou said jizz....I love you.
It's retarded to assume the point is to make them have a worthwhile experience.Saying something so simple as "The man puts his ding dong in the woman's...whatever and..." etc is all that's needed. It doesn't need to be graphic, it can even be dulled down, but the jizz-t of it is the same.
If you are gonna suggest people wait until their kids are older they're just gonna learn in school, come home and ask and the parents are gonna get more embarassed.
-AC
Originally posted by PunkyhermySex is really not that complicated.
because what will they gain from the knowledge of sexual acts at the time anyway?it is retarded to expose kids so young to concepts so complicated. people and threads like these and the many littering kmc are proof enough of the way the idea of sex facinates and befuddles masses of fully grown sexually active adults. how on earth would a 5 year old make exposure to sex a worthwhile experience?
Haven't any of you ever listened to Dr. Drew on Love Line on 107.7 the End?
Exposure to either pornography or sex (whether it be in the form of abuse or whitnessing it or whatever) is detrimental to development and leads to many complications in the future. A child isn't at that point in development yet. They are dealing with the simpler parts of growing up (i.e. social skills, vocabulary etc.). Its too much for them to deal with.
Exposing a child to porn at a young age, in many cases is even considered sexual abuse.
Originally posted by KumarI would disagree, but I'm a pervert, been around sex at a young age and whatnot.
Haven't any of you ever listened to Dr. Drew on Love Line on 107.7 the End?
Exposure to either pornography or sex (whether it be in the form of abuse or whitnessing it or whatever) is detrimental to development and leads to many complications in the future. A child isn't at that point in development yet. They are dealing with the simpler parts of growing up (i.e. social skills, vocabulary etc.). Its too much for them to deal with.
Exposing a child to porn at a young age, in many cases is even considered sexual abuse.
Originally posted by Kumar
Haven't any of you ever listened to Dr. Drew on Love Line on 107.7 the End?
Exposure to either pornography or sex (whether it be in the form of abuse or whitnessing it or whatever) is detrimental to development and leads to many complications in the future. A child isn't at that point in development yet. They are dealing with the simpler parts of growing up (i.e. social skills, vocabulary etc.). Its too much for them to deal with.
Exposing a child to porn at a young age, in many cases is even considered sexual abuse.
Yes sex is too complaicated for kids.. but headshots certaintly aren't!
Originally posted by Kumar
Haven't any of you ever listened to Dr. Drew on Love Line on 107.7 the End?
Exposure to either pornography or sex (whether it be in the form of abuse or whitnessing it or whatever) is detrimental to development and leads to many complications in the future. A child isn't at that point in development yet. They are dealing with the simpler parts of growing up (i.e. social skills, vocabulary etc.). Its too much for them to deal with.
Exposing a child to porn at a young age, in many cases is even considered sexual abuse.
specifically, what part of the development of social skills and vocabulary are effected by exposure to pornography?
also, why does explaining sex to your children and being open with them about it mean that they will see porn too early?
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
How on Earth would a child make exposure to violence a worthwhile expierence?"No little Jimmy, you can't watch this part of Starship Troopers, there's sex in it. *Covers Jimmy's eyes* Okay! Now there just fighting, you can look now. "
I agree with your point, though I might add that I don't feel that everything a child does need be a "worthwhile experience"
I am personally more worried about the exposure of children to gore and violence than I am of exposure to sex, but to be frank, I dont worry much about either. The long term relationship between violent and sexual media and any type of behavioural abnormalities (not just measures of aggression in a lab) is tenuious at best.