In the legit SF games to where Ryu could zone and footsie strongly, Ken has actually done worse within this match up, at usually a 6-4 match up in Ryu's favor. The only exceptions were in 3S...where Ryu couldn't zone or footsie effectively but more importantly that he got completely nerfed going into 3S while Ken stayed near exactly the same and with some slight improvements, and in A2 where the two could fight nearly equal, and the fact that Ken had one of the BEST CC's in the entire roster+ CC helped greatly.
Also, with the Ken buffs in SSF:IV, I really don't see how Ken is "now" better then Ryu in the statement of some people you know whom now claim Ken>Ryu. Considering that Ryu can do basically 99% of all the bs that he could in SF:IV minus Trade DP into Ultra...and people now claim Ryu is weaker then Ken? How?
I haven't really been up to date with Ken in SSF:IV as far changes go in recent time, however if I remember correctly SSF:IV Ken still doesn't have an easily accessible Ultra like Ryu, in a SF game in which Ultra's are nearly essential to you being very good. Those peeps must either know something I don't know about Ken that makes him "that" good, or else they are just angry over the fact that Ryu went from Stupid Easy Mode to Slightly Stupid Easy Mode.
Honestly though, they really need to stop nerfing the Shoryuken, and hopefully this will be as far as it goes. It's just lame to be getting smacked all the time for trying to punish somebody for jumping at the wrong times. Best Shoryuken's were still the CE/HF versions of old, great priority AA's that made you fear to jump in.
I would have been happy with the removal of trade shot into Ultra with Ryu's Shoryuken and even the tone down of damage, but lowering the inv. frames on it, when it wasn't even that big to begin with...sigh.