Originally posted by resolution
The only thing you can infer here is that since they gave Hulk a laser gun they didn't believe the meteor could be destroyed by pure propulsion impact combined with the Hulk's strength, you cannot conclude that they believed that there was no propulsion impact.So with that aside, Physics tells us there must be.
i should have stopped when you made that "big problem" argument. 😆
HE WAS ALREADY RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE METEOR when he said that!
"but i have a bigger problem IN FRONT OF ME NOW"
"But not too big for the incredible Hulk"
"with a little help from experimental antimagnetic jet propelled fortified rocket springs".
Sigh. 🙁 Can u read? Or are u just purposely ignoring what I and what was said on panel said? Christ!. First u came in and purposely ignored part of the statements from the scientist and tried to selectively use it to create the myth that the scientist intended for the the for the rocket springs to play a major part in destroying the asteroid. 😬 lol.
After that u switched tactics and started trying to use hulk statements to prove that the rocket springs aided him considerably. Yet not only were u applying them the wrong way but you showed ur inability to read as well because even in those statements that u keep quoting, the hulk says" with a little help" 😱.
Then in ur above post u cement ur idiocy and comprehension deficiency by talking about me concluding that there was no propulsion impact. When the whole point my arguement was not to prove that their was NO propulsion impact but that the rocket springs did NOT aid him considerably in the actual destruction of the asteroid. Those who can read( u obviously cant) will see that this is in line with the scientist statements regarding the hulk and their equipment.
But really i shud have expected such foolishness after reading ur first post in which u tried to selctively apply on panel evidence.
🙄 What a joke.