Superman vs Silver surfer

Started by One-Punch387 pages

This is pure gold. 😂

Abhi issues an open challenge to Surfer fans. Darth Goober challenges him to a Superman vs. Surfer BZ, with Surfer handicapped. Abhi backs down with 100 different excuses.

And here I thought you couldn't make yourself look anymore like an arse. You really are like a short guy picking a fight in a bar. Then when someone steps up, you make up some excuse not to fight, while saying you can beat them.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Can you do it and produce scans of Surfer doing the things you say?

Tbh, this seems to be the sticking point. I don't think it unreasonable.

And you know what, why don't you post how Surfer is going to beat Superman using your "maximum capacity" rule.

I will show you how Superman is going to beat the living **** out of surfer using pure combat scenes backed by comics.

Let's see whose is better.

Originally posted by One-Punch
This is pure gold. 😂

Abhi issues an open challenge to Surfer fans. Darth Goober challenges him to a Superman vs. Surfer BZ, with Surfer handicapped. Abhi backs down with 100 different excuses.

And here I thought you couldn't make yourself look anymore like an arse. You really are like a short guy picking a fight in a bar. Then when someone steps up, you make up some excuse not to fight, while saying you can beat them.

Originally posted by abhilegend
And you know what, why don't you post how Surfer is going to beat Superman using your "maximum capacity" rule.

I will show you how Superman is going to beat the living **** out of surfer using pure combat scenes backed by comics.

Let's see whose is better.


He can do all he can, right in this thread.

We'll see who wins, won't we?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Which would be what, "maximum capacity rule"? I'm curious, what is maximum capacity for surfer and how is it different than CBR? Far from that. Under those rules, Superman would beat the shit out of surfer in picoseconds or something like that. But where is the fun in that? I want to break Surfer fanboys' ego by simple comics portrayals.

Well then go ahead and come at me Krypto... unlike you I'm not afraid of the opposition's feats in and out of combat 🙂

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

You don't see the point of actual comics portrayals factoring but some arbitrary rules on a forum are of the point? Flash Fact: what we do or say have no meaning unless backed by comics.


No I don't see the point in arguing against a something I've already conceded... duh. And those "arbitrary forum rules" are the rules to be debated by on this forum(and something people like you cling to when debating characters like the Flash) so yeah, they do seem particularly relevant to debates that take place on this site.

Originally posted by abhilegend
But if you think surfer beats Superman, you must be able to make such claims by actual comic showings, right? Or are you conceding that going by comics, Superman would beat Surfer? Because here you are contradicting yourself.

Yeah by actual comic showings that include showings you want to bar from even being considered. If you were that concerned with "comic showings" you wouldn't be so obsessed with limiting the opposition.

Originally posted by abhilegend
And Lulz at "flagship" excuse. Superman has combat showings at that level because he is that damn powerful.

Hey if it's a Lulz worthy excuse than I'm sure a panel of impartial judges will agree with you so what are you so scared of?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Can you do it and produce scans of Surfer doing the things you say?
Originally posted by darthgoober
Yeah by actual comic showings that include showings you want to bar from even being considered.

Stop flirting and buying each other drinks. Time to get it on. Barry White is playing. My camera is set up, I may have Roofied one or both of you.

Bueno.

Why don't you make this BZ combat showings only thingy, I think it might be interesting?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Well then go ahead and come at me Krypto... unlike you I'm not afraid of the opposition's feats in and out of combat.
Unlike you, I can back up my claims without using some arbitrary rule Shalla-Ball.

No I don't see the point in arguing against a something I've already conceded... duh.

So you concede Superman beats surfer going by comics?
And those "arbitrary forum rules" are the rules to be debated by on this forum(and something people like you cling to when debating characters like the Flash) so yeah, they do seem particularly relevant to debates that take place on this site.

😂

You don't know me very well then. I always go by what's in the comic. And I can argue going by "forum rules".

Can you argue by comics?

Yeah by actual comic showings that include showings you want to bar from even being considered. If you were that concerned with "comic showings" you wouldn't be so obsessed with limiting the opposition.

That goes for both characters. You think surfer is some kind of exceptional character with no low showings?

Hey if it's a Lulz worthy excuse than I'm sure a panel of impartial judges will agree with you so what are you so scared of?

I'm ready to argue with you by your rules. Are you ready to argue with mine?

Originally posted by abhilegend
And you know what, why don't you post how Surfer is going to beat Superman using your "maximum capacity" rule.

I will show you how Superman is going to beat the living **** out of surfer using pure combat scenes backed by comics.

Let's see whose is better.


Lest you forget goober.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Tbh, this seems to be the sticking point. I don't think it unreasonable.

There obviously is not a specific instance of him busting out kryptonite or red sun radiation. This was based off his ability to sense what weakens people and reproduce a variety of different energies in the past. I don't really think it is that big of a jump in a thread where people are talking about Superman vibrating people out of existence.

I have no problem with people arguing against this. Like with energy draining, at least pointing out he can resist a sun eater lends credibility to resisting the Surfers energy drain.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Unlike you, I can back up my claims without using some arbitrary rule Shalla-Ball.

So you can "win" a debate if you get to ignore the rules of the debate while insisting that the opposition instead abide by the rules that YOU set down ... big accomplishment 😆 And actually that's flat out untrue because "Only combat feats are valid" IS an arbitrary rule...

Originally posted by abhilegend
So you concede Superman beats surfer going by comics?

Of course not, that's why their crossover is one of the only in existence that didn't have the heroes in question actually fighting it out. Even DC was like... nah better not...

I will however concede that Supes would put up a much better fight in the comics than he would in a forum fight though.

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

You don't know me very well then. I always go by what's in the comic. And I can argue going by "forum rules".

Can you argue by comics?

Even when the comic says that WW has better reflexes than Supes?

Of course I can, and I don't need to restrict the feats usable by all before the debate even begins unless the restrictions are intricall to the discussion at hand.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That goes for both characters. You think surfer is some kind of exceptional character with no low showings?

Yup goes for both characters, and Surfer definitely has his share of low showings.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I'm ready to argue with you by your rules. Are you ready to argue with mine?

You are... well now we're getting somewhere. What about judges, I'd suggest a panel of 5 rather than 3 since we're talking about such a monumental topic. I was thinking Digi, Newjack, leonidas, Galan, and Scoobless cause they're all pro debaters who're familiar with the forum rules, familiar with debating concepts like logical fallicies, able to separate a debate they're following from their own personal opinions, and not overly invested in either character.

And again, why would I argue a point that I already conceded 😂

Pfft,supes fanboys...surfer drains all the solar energy from supes. The end.

I just think it would be silly for Surfer to attempt to try to physically fight Superman.

Originally posted by Genii96
Pfft,supes fanboys...surfer drains all the solar energy from supes. The end.

I would of thought so as well, but to be fair if he legitimately did resist being energy drained by a Sun Eater then you could argue that might not be the best way to go here for Surfer. Unless this was a weakened Sun Eater or there were other circumstances involved.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Lest you forget goober.

Why perpetuate such a vicious cycle? "Surfer wins because "X"", "Bullshit Supes wins because of "Y", "No Surfer wins", "No Supes wins"... We both know you'd never concede the point regardless of what was posted(and in all honestly, I likely wouldn't either in the heat of the moment). That's the beauty of the BZ... the better argument is acknowledged by the judges regardless of how stubborn the debaters are.

Superman wins

Originally posted by Surtur
I just think it would be silly for Surfer to attempt to try to physically fight Superman.

I would of thought so as well, but to be fair if he legitimately did resist being energy drained by a Sun Eater then you could argue that might not be the best way to go here for Surfer. Unless this was a weakened Sun Eater or there were other circumstances involved.

Even if Surfer physically fought Superman, it's not like it would be a stomp. Surfer has the showings. Anyways, a regular Surfer vs Superman battlezone would be great. No specifics. Provide SHOWINGS from both. No specifics or leaving out certain scans. All in all, all for nothing...anything goes. If Surfer can beat Supes then everything that is brought to the table should prove this. If Superman can beat Surfer than everything that is brought to the table should prove this. Not just nitpicking of scans or scenarios.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Why perpetuate such a vicious cycle? "Surfer wins because "X"", "Bullshit Supes wins because of "Y", "No Surfer wins", "No Supes wins"... We both know you'd never concede the point regardless of what was posted(and in all honestly, I likely wouldn't either in the heat of the moment). That's the beauty of the BZ... the better argument is acknowledged by the judges regardless of how stubborn the debaters are.

👆

This as well.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just think it would be silly for Surfer to attempt to try to physically fight Superman.

I would of thought so as well, but to be fair if he legitimately did resist being energy drained by a Sun Eater then you could argue that might not be the best way to go here for Surfer. Unless this was a weakened Sun Eater or there were other circumstances involved.


You should ask abhi why Doctor Polaris was able drain/weaken Superman so easily, and he's no where near a Sun-Eater. He's basically DC's version of magneto lol.

We've seen an extremely blood-lusted Superman fight Wonder Woman. He didn't erase her from existence in a pico-second, like abhi would have you believe. She held her own long enough to break his mind-control.

Originally posted by One-Punch
You should ask abhi why Doctor Polaris was able drain/weaken Superman so easily, and he's no where near a Sun-Eater. He's basically DC's version of magneto lol.

We've seen an extremely blood-lusted Superman fight Wonder Woman. He didn't erase her from existence in a pico-second, like abhi would have you believe. She held her own long enough to break his mind-control.

This is true, and yeah Polaris brought him to his knee's by just making sure yellow sunlight stopped hitting him.

On top of that though he has other esoterics. He can phase, and Superman has no way to hit a phased character that I know of. As I recall, he can also slow down time in addition to possessing super speed.

Originally posted by darthgoober

You are... well now we're getting somewhere. What about judges, I'd suggest a panel of 5 rather than 3 since we're talking about such a monumental topic. I was thinking Digi, Newjack, leonidas, Galan, and Scoobless cause they're all pro debaters who're familiar with the forum rules, familiar with debating concepts like logical fallicies, able to separate a debate they're following from their own personal opinions, and not overly invested in either character.

And again, why would I argue a point that I already conceded 😂


Forget your panel of judges..

Digi's racist, Newjack has man-dates with Digi, leo is a hack, Galan is a quitter, and god only knows what goes on in Scoob's mind.

I recommend Rao Kal el, Time Imm, Lord of Bklyn, Boardwlkr, and Prof T McCabe as judges because aside from being very unbiased, they are also all pro debaters... Correction... Master-debaters! <--- Especially on all things Supermeng.....

😏