Originally posted by Keollyn
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
It occurs to me you still fail to understand or even realise the fact that the burden on proof is on you
Originally posted by Keollyn
So long as I'm right.
Nope, your wrong, you have yet to proved anything
Originally posted by Keollyn
Let's see how well you do here
We will see
Originally posted by Keollyn
And apparently, they said Sephiroth kept those spells from his one-time power up?
Was it even necessary to use spells on cloud? Hey einstein, if you actually watched advent children, you will realise sephiroth is toying around with cloud with his masamune hence it didnt became a necessity to use any spells.
Its like if you can blow up a tank with an RPG easily, you wouldnt need to call an airstrike and waste energy.
The very fact you fail to realise this pretty much indicates to me you have no form of common sense or even cow sense
Originally posted by Keollyn
Difference is... they said Sidious has them... They said nothing for Sephiroth.
The difference is, for sidious case its been stated by a source book, For sephiroths case, he demonstrates them in FFVII canon
cut scenes and numerous times in gameplay
Originally posted by Keollyn
I bet this is going to see another faulty, bad as can be, metaphor.
Only because you fail to see how flawed your logic is
Originally posted by Keollyn
No. I'm not asking for it. I don't see how you got me requesting it from that post...
"Then the person has to show it to me" In a way you did
Originally posted by Keollyn
Would that bring you pleasure?
Its a figure of speech dumbass
Originally posted by Keollyn
Because stronger means retained?http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Stronger
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/retained
Does not seem like a matching definition.
Sorry, the directors statements > your opinion, The facts > you.
AC sephiroth > FFVII sephiroth. That means what sephiroth has before has it later
Originally posted by Keollyn
Are we back to the intangibility thing? He's shown spells and barriers in cutscene? Were these when Sephiroth was not frozen?
Seems you have never played ffvii, He demonstrates intangibility when he walks through a ships hull bound for costa de sol. He uses spells against the fight with the party at the end.
Originally posted by Keollyn
You just said intangibility, and spells in cutscene.
Pretty much proven
Originally posted by Keollyn
The failure is pretty much in your court.
Lets see, you failed to prove anything, you failed to use proper logic, you have horrible analogy, you fail to realise the burden of proof is on you, You even fail to notice that your a hypocrite
Originally posted by Keollyn
So your name is sparky? How come it's not capitalized? Did your mama thought that'd make you a special child?
Lol? Is this suppose to funny, seems to me that because your losing a debate, you have proceded to attack me. How did i indicate my name was sparky? Lol, simple, i never did
Originally posted by Keollyn
I said the burden of proof doesn't fall on [b]me. You are not me. I actually have a "My brain functions" I.Q.[/B]
It does, you have not proved or backed up your claim of him not having any spells simply because he doesnt demonstrate it hence you are
speculating and so forth the burden of
proof is on you.
I on the other hand have elaborated what he has done in ffvii and at the least listed down some of his feats which pretty much destroys your assumptions
Originally posted by Keollyn
1. Sephiroth didn't use any spells in AC
Doesn't mean he *does not* have any spells. Thats horrible analogy again
Originally posted by Keollyn
2. He talked... and talked some more
3. Sephiroth used his sword for most of the fight
4. He lost.... again.
Simply because he wanted to toy around with cloud with his sword, its his preference for using a sword. That doesnt equate to him not having spells after being stated to be more powerful than his ffvii incarnation
Originally posted by Keollyn
Me: He doesn't have any spells in AC.
You: Ohh boo hoo, just because he doesn't, doesn't mean he doesn't. Doesn't doesn't mean doesn't!
Denials a ***** huh? Prove up or shut up which you have yet to do either
Originally posted by Keollyn
I think the first "doesn't" pretty much proved my point.
Does not have and does not use are 2 different terms, it makes a world of difference