Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh yeah you're sure neural. 🙄Its not circular logic. Its just plain logic.
Seriously, did you not notice all the contradictions in his arguments?
Rachel is the equivilent of The full force phoenix due to his argument using the hyperbolic speech of a nitwit. Yes, I just called the phoenix force a nitwit. It's not omniscent, in fact thinking doesn't seem to be its strong suit. You can identify with that.
Rachel certainly didn't gain any extra knowledge from the force, that or it didn't know about its own nature. Jean even had to remind it of the speech that it had used on Jean. Or did you not read endsong where Jean had to tell the Force that they were one?
You don't find that funny? That a host was telling the force that they were one as if it didn't know? Which it didn't at that point in time.
Next up after saying that Rachel was all that the force is, he says that the Beyonder gave Rachel the full power of the phoenix. In order for him to have done that that means that she DIDN'T have that. otherwise its like me saying that I'me giving you the power to breath. Oops, you already have that.
So either she already was everything the force was or she wasn't.
You don't see a contradiction there?
It would help your side of the debate if you chose not to throw so many insults about with every statement. It's hard to be impartial when anybody who even remotely questions your statements is responded to with direct insults.