Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusNo. By your standards, he is overwhelmingly stronger. Not just noticeably. Because ignoring everything else, straight-up strength, she'd die.
Because those are all obviously the same? Superman is overwhelmingly stronger than Diana. She can't go toe to toe with him in a contest of might as their encounters show. There's nothing to debate in that area. I'm not sure why you think making stupid analogies somehow takes away from that.If Diana and Clark fought in a contest of pure skill, she'll wreck him and you're free to make that claim in a vs. thread. I'm not sure why you have a problem with what I said. Do you not find it relevant enough? I agree that it's unlikely Diana will go toe to toe with Superman because she's intelligent but I don't give a shit. That doesn't detract from what I said.
I made my stance pretty clear but you being the nitpicking little prick that you are had to make it complicated. You might have had a point if I was using Clark's strength advantage to argue that this wouldn't be a competitive fight but I never made such claims. I said the exact opposite and yet you keep pretending like I'm not giving Diana credit or something.
Superman is noticeably stronger than Wonder Woman. Do you agree or disagree? It's really that simple.
And no, I don't think you're moving the goalposts. You're not arguing against Diana being overwhelmingly more skilled or magical. Because ignoring everything else, straight-up skill, he'd die. He just would. No chance. Same thing with going up against her magical weapons. Straight-up, he'd die, no chance. You'd agree to that. I'm not insinuating you wouldn't. That's how it lays out.
So ultimately, Superman is overwhelmingly stronger, Wonder Woman is overwhelmingly more skilled and Superman is overwhelmingly vulnerable to her magic weapons. And I don't find this to detract anything from what you said. Because thinking about it that way, I'd tend to agree.