okay, so there are a LOT of bullets. and it appears he is coming from quite some distance away and he missed one . . .
you say you give 'proof' thor is stronger. WHAT proof?? thor lifted a sword that's said to have been made of white dwarf material (and if it was it WOULD be a sun-like mass)? you assume superman couldn't do it even more easily. crossovers suck, but again, they are our only true measuring stick. supes knocked out prof hulk. in other meetings with savage hulk, their battles have been virtual ties. like or don't like it. refuse to accept it as canon. whatever. when thor didn't have his hammer, savage hulk almost beat him TO DEATH! when he fought prof hulk WITH his hammer, it was a draw. in jla/avengers supes was shown to be the stronger.
you say to keep in mind realistic limits don't count - no kidding. but does that mean i should believe gladiator can tear stars in half because it says so in a comic? how about HULK IS STRONGEST ONE THERE IS? why debate anything else - it says clearly hulk is strongest. case closed. realistic limits and common sense are 2 different things. and to your point - it's possible thor is as strong. i just happen to believe superman is stronger. i also believe he is faster and more durable. but i love thor as well, and he's a god using powerful magic and his own feats of power are undeniable. it's why i say this match (and i think this might be the first battle where i've said this) is a legitimate draw.
you can't prove thor is stronger or as strong because there is no equivalent gauge. a sword?? no, that's not gonna do it. it's why i say x-overs, bad as they are, are the only fair gauge.
thor can throw a mass FAR exceeding the earth's mass, and supes can outrace a photon. why accept one, and not the other?
Originally posted by leonidas
okay, so there are a LOT of bullets. and it appears he is coming from quite some distance away and he missed one . . .
True, he was coming from a distance (the palace where he fought Wolveri-er Equus) and it was a LOT of bullets...but he didn't miss one--he missed them ALL.
He could've probably used his heat vision to melt the bullets though...Azarrello is kinda sucky at writing Supes and Bats...he should stick to 100 Bullets.
Zahit: Jeez man, you have one of my coworkers dying with all of this ****. He saw the website, and he's been running thru it ever since. Now we aren't going to get anything done today.
Originally posted by DrDoom
Zahit: Jeez man, you have one of my coworkers dying with all of this ****. He saw the website, and he's been running thru it ever since. Now we aren't going to get anything done today.
get to work.
Originally posted by leonidas
okay, so there are a LOT of bullets. and it appears he is coming from quite some distance away and he missed one . . .you say you give 'proof' thor is stronger. WHAT proof?? thor lifted a sword that's said to have been made of white dwarf material (and if it was it WOULD be a sun-like mass)? you assume superman couldn't do it even more easily. crossovers suck, but again, they are our only true measuring stick. supes knocked out prof hulk. in other meetings with savage hulk, their battles have been virtual ties. like or don't like it. refuse to accept it as canon. whatever. when thor didn't have his hammer, savage hulk almost beat him TO DEATH! when he fought prof hulk WITH his hammer, it was a draw. in jla/avengers supes was shown to be the stronger.
you say to keep in mind realistic limits don't count - no kidding. but does that mean i should believe gladiator can tear stars in half because it says so in a comic? how about HULK IS STRONGEST ONE THERE IS? why debate anything else - it says clearly hulk is strongest. case closed. realistic limits and common sense are 2 different things. and to your point - it's possible thor is as strong. i just happen to believe superman is stronger. i also believe he is faster and more durable. but i love thor as well, and he's a god using powerful magic and his own feats of power are undeniable. it's why i say this match (and i think this might be the first battle where i've said this) is a legitimate draw.
you can't prove thor is stronger or as strong because there is no equivalent gauge. a sword?? no, that's not gonna do it. it's why i say x-overs, bad as they are, are the only fair gauge.
thor can throw a mass FAR exceeding the earth's mass, and supes can outrace a photon. why accept one, and not the other?
He missed all of the bullets. They are coming from one gun.
I am assuming that Superman can't lift Twilight? Has he displayed enough strength to do so? I haven't assumed anything. I have used Superman's feats in his comics to gauge his strength. You are assuming that Thor is slower than Superman. You are assuming everything.
Perhaps you didn't realise this, but comic book characters don't exist in the real world. As I said, the limitations of reality are not imposed in a comic book.
Crossovers aren't our only measuring stick. Comic book feats are the best measuring stick. Savage Hulk has limitless strength, as you know. If crossovers were written well, he would overpower Superman as well.
According to your logic, anything that you don't like should be dismissed as non-canon. Thor actually lifted Twilight. When did Superman actually outrace a photon?