Thor vs Superman

Started by OneDumbG0453 pages

Originally posted by h1a8
I'll try to find them. But Thor specifically says that he must build up enough speed to swing his hammer FTL. The panel is showing him doing this while he's saying it.

The telepathic blast looks like slow moving fire. So its speculation that it is light speed or faster.

Also, the telepathic blast was telegraphed by a slow arm motion to point at Thor. If someone is moving their arms to point and shoot at you then you can easily get you arm up to block. Hell, martial artists can block a punch that isn't telegraphed. What heat vision are you referring too? Any scans? And SS bolts looked like lightning in that scan. Pure speculation that those bolts were light speed.

I look forward to your producing the scans. Because if Thor himself says it, I'll accept it. As for the telepathic blast, I think it takes more speculation to assume it is STL (slower then light). One thing, the captions describe it as an "instantaneous" blast. Another thing, telepathy by its nature usually travels FTL. Otherwise, Martian Manhunter could never communicate with Flash and Xavier could never contact his X-Men when they were in another galaxy.

Also, the telepathic blast may have been telegraphed. But the FTL battle reflexes I am referring to is the blast being blasted and already travelling at Thor, and Thor then raises his arms to deflect it. He did not already have Mjolnir raised to deflect it before it was fired. Therefore, he had to move his arms into position, at a faster speed then the attack. The heat vision I am referring to is him blocking Gladiator's heat vision. Posted several pages ago.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor's arm moving several inches after a light speed attack has nothing to do with his ability to turn around when someone zips behind him. Thor can't even run at supersonic speeds.
OHOTMU lists him at 115mph tops. And since the comics hasn't contradicted this stat then it is valid. Plus I haven't seen good proof that Thor can legitimately respond to a light speed attack (like a laser). If there were something else I can infer from then I probably will, just show me. I'm like you, I will even accept if he or the narrator says the speed is light speed.
Except that he's moving it several feet, not just inches. If you can move your arms at FTL speeds, why law of science prevents you from twisting your body or moving your legs? Most people don't use handbooks as evidence, h1a8. And if you use them, you have to use it all. Otherwise I'd call you out on selective reading and a double-standard. Marvel handbooks also indicate that JLA/Avengers actually happened. I would suggest that you drop handbooks; they are a very slippery slope. Besides, the writers already admit that there are a lot of mistakes and most people don't use them in KMC debates anyway.
Originally posted by h1a8
Maybe. But that would mean that Superman can launch simultaneous attacks at the same time (redundant I know). This is an added plus for Superman. But many here say that if one can instantly travel at light speed then certainly they can blitz at light speed. Do you agree? If yes then do you think Superman can blitz at light speed? If no, then can you explain how one can instant travel at light speed while multiple punching but can't blitz at light speed.
Look, I can understand why people would infer FTL battle speed and reflexes from instantaneous FTL travelling speed. But I choose not to accept it. And I don't actually remember Superman ever travelling at light speed instantaneously. I know that Flash can do it. But I have seen Superman come short too many times to believe that he can instantaneously achieve FTL speeds. For instance, it takes him a while to achieve light speed when he is trying to escape that black hole. If he could do it instantaneously, why'd it take him so long to achieve it? Besides, if I chose to accept this standard, then Silver Surfer vs. Superman would be a terrible curbstomp for Surfer. Surfer has been clearly depicted as instanteously achieving light speed and you and I would have all the Superman fans up in arms at that point.
Originally posted by h1a8
Understood. But PIS is apart of comics. Never forget that. Just because it happened doesn't mean it will happen in a forum fight. But neither SS nor Gladiator has shown the ability to both react and deal with light speed attacks. Speed and reflexes are two different things. You need both. Hell, I don't think that either SS or Gladiator has been shown to have nanosecond reflexes (what does that mean anyway?). SS's scan saying that if he stayed in there a nanosecond longer.... doesn't prove that he can both react and deal with a light speed attack. I also take that scan as him speaking figuratively and not literally. And I'm fairly sure that Gladiator's feat is in an alternate universe or something. But let's not argue here anyway. Let's just say I'm wrong here since this isn't even what my argument is about.
Gladiator and Hyperion fought in the 616 universe in a Quasar comic during the storyline 'Starblast.' The captions state that Hyperion returns a punch nanoseconds later after Gladiator rains a blow on him. Gladiator blocks the punch. Gladiator eventually beats Hyperion. It's in the Gladiator respect thread.
Originally posted by h1a8
Also,
Time doesn't equal speed. I'm tired of people saying 'nanosecond' to refer to moving FTL.
Interesting point. If Surfer flexes his muscles in a nanosecond... how fast is that really? I honestly never gave it much thought. A picosecond is one millionth of a second. A nanosecond is one billionth of a second. After looking it up and with some rough calculations, it takes light a lil more then 1 nanosecond to move 1 foot. So if Surfer flexes arms from behind his back and over his head, that's about 6 feet. If he does that in less then a nanosecond, his arms are moving six times the speed of light. If Hyperion and Gladiator throw a punch the length of the arm, around 3 feet. And that takes a few nanoseconds later... let's say 3 nanoseconds? Then the fist is moving at light speed. It's rough, I know. And tough to measure and quantify what happens in a comic panel. But I guess it's up to the individual to make up for his own mind if nanosecond reaction times are light speed times. I personally think that since light only moves 1 foot in 1 nanosecond, nanoseconds are a good measure of light speed battle reflexes and such.
Originally posted by h1a8
I give up credit though. You are really challenging me. Okay, lets get to the nitty gritty and stop the needless speculation.

1. Can Thor turn his body around at the same speed that Superman can zip behind him with? If you say yes then we will discuss the details of that and if you say no then we can stop here as this proves Superman would win. Do you see how?

2. Can Thor deal with two attacks coming at him at the same time (and at least one of them is lightspeed)? If yes then explain how? For example, Superman shooting him with HV at the same time punching with both hands.

1. I think he could. He's raised his arms at FTL speeds. I don't see too much speculation necessary to project that ability to move his arms into his ability to twist his waist around. But apparently he's not clearly twisted his hip around at FTL speeds on-panel. At the least, Gladiator and Hyperion exchange punches and twist their bodies around in nanoseconds...

2. Well, he'd block the HV with Mjolnir in one hand and defend against the punches with his other hand. But then again, I'll concede he's not actually done this on-panel. He's actually deflected flying bricks with a Mjolnir swing and left himself open to a Gladiator punch. I suppose he could just actually hit Superman in the face with Mjolnir and bypass defense altogether. Best defense is a good offense?

Good questions.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I was refering to this:
"That's exactly what they are trying to say. They also want to infer that Superman can achieve FTL speedblitzes despite never having done so on-panel. "
And... yet... he's never done so on-panel. Nobody even shows him doing stuff at FTL speeds other then travelling. The best we got is a disputable scan of him rebuilding Bizarro city. So your point?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
And... yet... he's never done so on-panel. Nobody even shows him doing stuff at FTL speeds other then travelling. The best we got is a disputable scan of him rebuilding Bizarro city. So your point?
My point is you're breaking the rules in the same manner you always do try and prove your point.

🙂

Also you commit argumentum ad ignorantium.

I don't understand why Thors feats keep being ignored?

Also, Soljer. You asked for scans of Thor making sonic booms through combat speed. I gave them to you.

Originally posted by Creshosk
My point is you're breaking the rules in the same manner you always do try and prove your point.

🙂

Also you commit argumentum ad ignorantium.

He's never been shown to do anything at FTL speeds other then flying. Travelling speed does not equal battle speed. I don't have to ignore the PIS rule to argue that travel speed does not equate to battle speed. It's pretty much a standard that nearly everyone supports.

I spanked your arguments over in the Punisher v. Wolverine thread and you follow me here? I know you're breathing a sigh of relief that it was closed to reduce the exposure of your humiliation. But trolling? Mischaracterizing my argument that travel speed does not equal battle speed? That's just sad... take it easy and contribute something more then false characterizations or you go straight on my ignore list. At least other people are debating.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
He's never been shown to do anything at FTL speeds other then flying. Travelling speed does not equal battle speed. I don't have to ignore the PIS rule to argue that travel speed does not equate to battle speed. It's pretty much a standard that nearly everyone supports.
Argumentum ad ignoratium and onthological argument. 🙂

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
[BI spanked your arguments over in the Punisher v. Wolverine thread and you follow me here? I know you're breathing a sigh of relief that it was closed to reduce the exposure of your humiliation. But trolling? Mischaracterizing my argument that travel speed does not equal battle speed? That's just sad... take it easy and contribute something more then false characterizations or you go straight on my ignore list. At least other people are debating. [/B]
You really need to get over yourself you have any clue how arrogent you sound?

You aren't making any valid claims and I'm pointing that out. Somehow that translates to you having spanked me when you did nothing of the sort?

You don't own people with faulty logic that you employ. And I'm pointing out your faulty logic by pointing out the names of the fallacies you're commiting.

So now you're going to run away and ignore me becuase the best way you have to handle me is to claim you've beaten me and then ignore me?

Yeah... You need to grow up and get over yourself.

Originally posted by Ruin
I don't understand why Thors feats keep being ignored?

Also, Soljer. You asked for scans of Thor making sonic booms through combat speed. I gave them to you.

What, you mean this? lmao

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/Thorspeed.jpg

All he did was hit Heimdal hard enough to create a sonic boom. It wasn't because of his combat speed. What Thor did there was basically the same thing that Colossus, Thing, Hulk, etc. do when they use a thunder clap.

I'm sensing a trend here... Thor supporters seem to be grossly misinterpreting their own scans. READ THE CAPTIONS, PEOPLE!!!

Originally posted by batdude123
What, you mean this? lmao

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/Thorspeed.jpg

All he did was hit Heimdal hard enough to create a sonic boom. It wasn't because of his combat speed. What Thor did there was basically the same thing that Colossus, Thing, Hulk, etc. do when they use a thunder clap.

I'm sensing a trend here... Thor supporters seem to be grossly misinterpreting their own scans. READ THE CAPTIONS, PEOPLE!!!


Meanwhile, city building isn't valid proof for Supes.

Originally posted by Cerpin Taxt
Meanwhile, city building isn't valid proof for Supes.

crylaugh

Originally posted by batdude123
What, you mean this? lmao

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/Thorspeed.jpg

All he did was hit Heimdal hard enough to create a sonic boom. It wasn't because of his combat speed. What Thor did there was basically the same thing that Colossus, Thing, Hulk, etc. do when they use a thunder clap.

I'm sensing a trend here... Thor supporters seem to be grossly misinterpreting their own scans. READ THE CAPTIONS, PEOPLE!!!

Are you serious?

Sonic booms aren't created by striking people. I'm far from a scientist but to my knowledge, sonic booms occur when an object passes through the air, it creates a series of pressure waves in front of it and behind it. These waves travel at the speed of sound. To my knowledge this is in no way similar to a thunderclap.

Originally posted by batdude123
crylaugh
That's building speed not combat speed. who cares how fast he had to react to the environment to grab exactly what was needed and put it exactly where it needed to go. Cause you know throw in a fist to punch some one is much different than putting a brick in place.

or something stupid like that.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Argumentum ad ignoratium and onthological argument. 🙂

You really need to get over yourself you have any clue how arrogent you sound?

You aren't making any valid claims and I'm pointing that out. Somehow that translates to you having spanked me when you did nothing of the sort?

You don't own people with faulty logic that you employ. And I'm pointing out your faulty logic by pointing out the names of the fallacies you're commiting.

So now you're going to run away and ignore me becuase the best way you have to handle me is to claim you've beaten me and then ignore me?

Yeah... You need to grow up and get over yourself.

It's, uh, argumentum ad ignoratiam actually. You keep characterizing my argument that "travel speed does not equal battle speed" is ignoring the rule of PIS. But I don't understand why you keep saying that. Flash can move, react and has done all sorts of stuff at clearly FTL speeds. So he could fight and should fight at FTL speeds.

It's being disputed right now that Superman has done anything FTL other then fly at FTL speeds. So he could fly and should fly at FTL speeds. But necessarily concluding that he could fight at FTL speeds lacks a fundamental proposition and uses an assumption to make a conclusion. I don't have to place a fancy Latin term on this. Its just a conclusory argument.

I only ignore people that flame and don't debate. I've been flamed by the best, but a lot of those posters also debate. I don't put them on ignore. You're not debating at all. You're just criticizing my use of "travel speed does not equal battle speed" and mischaracterizing it as ignoring the no-PIS rule. I have no idea what you're talking about. Now you've followed me over here to carry on a conversation from a Punisher vs. Wolverine thread. That's trolling. Personally, I'll give you another chance to explain why "travel speed does not equal battle speed" is a blatant disregard of the no-PIS rule. If you don't, then you're on ignore.

Originally posted by Ruin
Are you serious?

Sonic booms aren't created by striking people. I'm far from a scientist but to my knowledge, sonic booms occur when an object passes through the air, it creates a series of pressure waves in front of it and behind it. These waves travel at the speed of sound. To my knowledge this is in no way similar to a thunderclap.

So striking something really hard isn't like striking something really hard?

You ever notice its the bricks that thunder clap and not the speedsters whom can dance circles around said bricks?

Originally posted by Creshosk
That's building speed not combat speed. who cares how fast he had to react to the environment to grab exactly what was needed and put it exactly where it needed to go. Cause you know throw in a fist to punch some one is much different than putting a brick in place.

or something stupid like that.

So what would be the difference in using the instance in which Surfer thoroughly scanned the earth in moments as an indication that he could speedblitz?

Originally posted by Creshosk
So striking something really hard isn't like striking something really hard?

You ever notice its the bricks that thunder clap and not the speedsters whom can dance circles around said bricks?

I've never actually seen a brick(Huk, Juggernaut, Colossus, etc) create a sonic boom by hitting someone. Forgive me for my ignorance but do you have a particular instance in mind?

Originally posted by Ruin
So what would be the difference in using the instance in which Surfer thoroughly scanned the earth in moments as an indication that he could speedblitz?

Because scanning the Earth with ridiculous travel speed and unparalleled cosmic senses is not comparable.

Originally posted by Soljer
Because scanning the Earth with ridiculous travel speed and unparalleled cosmic senses is not comparable.

Oh, ok. 👆

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
It's, uh, agumentum ad ignorati[b]am actually.[/b]
Oh going to pick on a typo are we? I mispelled it so obviously I know nothing about it.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You keep characterizing my argument that "travel speed does not equal battle speed" is ignoring the rule of PIS.
Actually its the whole "He hasn't shown to speed blitz people, therefore he cant do it" that breaks the pis and full capacity rules.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
But I don't understand why you keep saying that. Flash can move, react and has done all sorts of stuff at clearly FTL speeds. So he could fight and should fight at FTL speeds.
As has superman.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
It's being disputed right now that Superman has done anything FTL other then fly at FTL speeds.
Naturally. You have to prove that things he's clearly done he can't do in order to gain your side support. Hence the rule breaking.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
So he could fly and should fly at FTL speeds. But necessarily concluding that he could fight at FTL speeds lacks a fundamental proposition and uses an assumption to make a conclusion.
Because reacting at FTL speeds while flying doesn't translate to reacting at FTL speeds?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I don't have to place a fancy Latin term on this. Its just a conclusory argument.
ITs an invalid one. an "Argument from ignornce"

"If I haven't seen it it must not have happened. Combat speed is what I define combat speed to be."

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I only ignore people that flame and don't debate.
So you'd ignore yourself then?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I've been flamed by the best, but a lot of those posters also debate. I don't put them on ignore. You're not debating at all. You're just criticizing my use of "travel speed does not equal battle speed" and mischaracterizing it as ignoring the no-PIS rule.
Onthological argument.

"Debate has one set style so your socratic style is not actual debate, as Socrates was never a debater. He was just a guy who pointed out the flaws in other peoples arguments. Much like you're doing."

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Obviously.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Now you've followed me over here to carry on a conversation from a Punisher vs. Wolverine thread.
Because Arguing about Superman vs Thor on speeds and interpritation of their comics is exactly what we were debating... Oh wait... no it wasn't.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
That's trolling. Personally, I'll give you another chance to explain why "travel speed does not equal battle speed" is a blatant disregard of the no-PIS rule. After that, you're on ignore.
Strawman argument.

Thanks for not understanding my arguments. Makes you're declaring yourself the winner and then ignoring the person you spanked not look cowardish in the slightest. 🙂

Originally posted by Ruin
I've never actually seen a brick(Huk, Juggernaut, Colossus, etc) create a sonic boom by hitting someone. Forgive me for my ignorance but do you have a particular instance in mind?
Every time a brick thunderclaps its by clapping their hands together to create a loud thunderous clap.

It's called sarcasm.