Originally posted by Acrosurge
Carver9 thought Cap had a similar showing. I disagreed. *shrugs*So, nobody is arguing that Cap has greater strength than Spider-Man? What about agility? Is speed the only attribute really being debated here?
Why would anyone be ignorant enough to argue strength and agility?
Cap's average strength is portrayed around the one-ton class. His absolute BEST feats may touch two or three. Spidey tosses around Cap's best like it was a beachball.
And as to agility....Cap's agile, but Spidey's inhuman.
In response to your question....yeah. Speed is the only thing being debated, mostly because with Cap's skill, his strength is really next to irrelevant. It wouldn't take many good hits for either character to take the other down - as Spidey has been shown to be vulnerable to nerve strikes and pressure points, a favorable technique to the good Captain.
The question is, simply; which happens first? Cap gets into a position where he can no longer roll with a punch and gets his head taken off, or Spidey is paralyzed by a nerve strike and summarily beaten into submission?
Their feats show the two on a comparable level in speed(even if we all agree it's Parker that's faster), but Cap's skill is quite clearly light years ahead of Parker's.
Which is why the Spidey supporters only real recourse is to cry "I don't like it! It didn't happen!" with respect to Cap's speed feats, and claim instead that Parker is fast enough to make Cap a statute in comparison.