Metalmanx
Illuminati Founder
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
...and the fact that a robot clone of Spiderman said that he couldnt take Cap in H2H means that it must be true because the robot was not holding back. 😐The fact that Spiderman managed to trick the robot once is not an accurate analysis of the fight. The fcat the robot tricked Spiderman twice prior to that should be considered also. The fact the fight would have kept going on and either one of them could have won it should be considered also.
...
Is that really all you have as reasoning for Cap winning? That a ROBOT Spider-Man said that he couldn't take Cap? The same robot that gave a 15-year-old Spidey trouble (and whom Spidey eventually defeated)? If that's so, then this debate is already done.
However, because I (usually) respect you enough to give you a proper debate, I will give you two MAJOR reasons as to why this use of robot-logic is extremely faulty.
1. The robot, while just like Spidey, lacked a SPIDER-SENSE. If I really need to go further into this and why it's important, then all hope is lost.
2. If we're talking about the same robot, then that was in 1964. Over forty years ago. You have any idea how much Spidey has evolved in ever single aspect since then?
And no, the Spidey-robot really had no chance of winning agaist the real Spidey. A big reason being that, as a robot, it would eventually need to replenish its power supply. Real Spidey, however, can run off of sheer force of will and determination that can keep him going, as we've seen before dozens and dozens of times in his past.