Originally posted by llagrok
We do.But his other feats BARELY put him above Thanos, and maybe even below him in durability. Thanos has taken far worse than Tyrant has apparently, but from the looks of it Tyrant can (barely) dish out more.
Tyrant does not have any other feats that put him on par with Odin.
They had a direct confrontation and Tyrant wasnt phased. Thanos left. Tyrant also could beat on Galactus while Thanos couldnt take more than few shots wit his shields up.
How can anyone in their right mind put his durability below Thanos'. How? Thanos isnt the baddest character out right and thats great because thats boring. I wouldnt like a character who was at Galactus level or higher because its extremely broing and theres no challenge.
Thanos in this whole story took on someone more powerful tha him. To see if he could take it and he could but couldnt defeat him with his own power alone and this was proven in their battle.
But Tyrant is on a whole other level and is near Galactus. I love Thanos to death but he beat on Thanos easily and didnt know who the hell he was. Thanos did get more powerful since their confrontation but he still couldnt last long with Galactus.
Tyrant was beating on a well fed prepped Galactus. Beating him senseless where Morg had to save him.
You are acting totally ignorant here. Tyrant has not lost to anyone on panel since he was depowered. No one so for anyone to question his durability when he has no low showings its completely ignorant.