Originally posted by Grand_Moff_GavNah, you are right on both counts.
Perhaps being the keyword...however because it is unlikely anyone here is really sure of what they would do...the question becomes pointless...Also, you get the fact that most people will lie and say they would act a way that fits a stereotype they wish to project...or is that too cynical?
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
The only law breakers in this case were the two thieves. The guy who shot them was well with in it. They took a calculated risk when they chose to burglarize, but unfortunately for them, the person who caught them wasn't a hapless wheelchair-bound 80-year-old.On top of that, they shouldn't have been here in the first place.
Oh...so if they should be beaten to death in a brutal manner?
Originally posted by Quiero MotaAnd the shooter should never have been there either.
The only law breakers in this case were the two thieves. The guy who shot them was well with in it. They took a calculated risk when they chose to burglarize, but unfortunately for them, the person who caught them wasn't a hapless wheelchair-bound 80-year-old.On top of that, they shouldn't have been here in the first place.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
An opinion you apparently share.
Yes? So? Doesn't make it more than opinion.
And so now you think his response was understandable? Even after lebeling him a murderer and a blood thirsty villain?
And RJ, your hypothetical question is utterly pointless. How we'd react in a different situation has nothing to do with the case at hand.
Originally posted by BackFireYes, I already acknowledged that in a situation this extreme, it's useless asking "What would I do?".....It's not like he shoplifted, he killed two men.
Yes? So? Doesn't make it more than opinion.And so now you think his response was understandable? Even after lebeling him a murderer and a blood thirsty villain?
And RJ, your hypothetical question is utterly pointless. How we'd react in a different situation has nothing to do with the case at hand.
No, just the justified part, and by justified I mean he walked, he was not found guilty of murder, that's all.
I never said it was understandable. Far from it, in fact.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
So you never, not once, regarding any situation in life, put yourself in another persons shoes? Look at it as if you were them? What would you have done if a certain something happened to you?And you talk about me having no brains.
You have no brains, you moron of nature.
Again you ask me idiotic, off-topic questions, to divert attention from your apparent idiocy. Seriously, just run from the thread and pretend it never happened, is the far less embarrassing troll tactic.
As I said twice, I could, easily, answer your question, but I shan't, seeing as it is a pointless exercise and you will draw inane and inconsistent conclusions from it, which will just annoy and irritate me. Once you have a valid question to this topic you will receive an answer.
Originally posted by Bardock42But I love you. heartbeat
You have no brains, you moron of nature.Again you ask me idiotic, off-topic questions, to divert attention from your apparent idiocy. Seriously, just run from the thread and pretend it never happened, is the far less embarrassing troll tactic.
As I said twice, I could, easily, answer your question, but I shan't, seeing as it is a pointless exercise and you will draw inane and inconsistent conclusions from it, which will just annoy and irritate me. Once you have a valid question to this topic you will receive an answer.