Once again personifying hypocrisy.
You're the one who continuously repeats the same bullshit "evidence" of "on-panel" feats to support that the DD feat isn't PIS completely regardless of context. You're the one who keeps dodging important questions and proof that discredits your arguments... The one who's failed to concede even the smallest of points even when "ON-PANEL" evidence is brought to the table to prove you wrong, making up comic events in issues that have never taken place.... Hell.... You've projected your desperation onto me before in this thread and only continue to do so here.
But at the end of the day....
You NEED to prove that the feat of DD putting Logan down is legitimate
in some fasion.... you HAVEN'T...
You NEED to prove that Logan was near peak condition while fighting
Cap... you HAVEN'T....
And instead of proving anything about your position, you've only succeeded in criticising me of mine (regardless of evidence) and accusing me of doing the things you yourself are guilty of....
Myths?
All you've done is make up your own "myth" regarding Wolverine being more suseptible to damage in localized spots than he is on the by and large... NEVER in ANY comic Wolverine has appeared in as this been stated, pondered, or even suggested.... AT ALL.... and yet you continue on stating it as a fact... It isn't one.. and the fact that you think it is only goes to show how far gone in your own hypocrisy you really are.
You think because there's a few low showings of Wolverine being hurt by a certain attack here and there, that automatically seperates it from the high showings as a legitimate feat simply because it's being performed by a skilled fighter at the time?... It is nonsense when I can come up with 5 or more examples to the contrary for every one you've posted... 10 to 20 examples to the contrary for every LEGITIMATE one you've posted... and I've just been going off the top of my head.
The way your argument works, the Thing could be likely to KO Wolverine with a bonk to the head I suppose, it beckons one to ask if you even understand the concept of what a low showing is.
You want to argue there to be a consistency with high ranking fighters?
What a joke!
Half the people who were cutting Wolverine's throat or stabbing him through the chest WERE high ranking fighters...
Ogun, Gorgon, Shingen, Silver Samurai, Azreal, Swordsmen, Mr. X, Mystique, Kitty Pride, X-23..... There's no consistency with high class fighters doing more damage to Logan than anyone else.. There's just low showings; just like there's low showings against more physically imposing opponents.... But low showings do not a character make.
And yet still.... not ONE of those people have ever one shotted Logan like DD did... whether it was against Wolverine pre- Fatal Attractions, against Wolverine while taxed, against Wolverine while poisoned... Even with every advantage to their favor.... NO ONE EVER HAS ONE SHOTTED LOGAN with a single strike like DD did in that ENNIS issue... 😐
But it's legitimate huh? Even though Logan was standing up to having half his body mass blown to a skeleton in the same arc?
Yeah... 🙄
But I know what you'd say to that... "No one's ever embarrassed DD blah blah blah"
Wrong.. but since you want to whine about the DD example again. I did show you equivolent evidence. It wasn't in YOUR opinion because you choose to ignore Elektra's composure during the fight, choose to ignore how she feels about Matt, and choose to ignore... well... CONTEXT... like you have been throughout the entirety of this discussion.... but it doesn't matter at any rate... wanna know why?
The simple fact of the matter is that this Logic of DD not being owned doesn't work for one very important reason......
I can show you other evidence of Logan owning people at, below, around, and above Matt's area of skill just as badly if not worse...
Shang Chi,
Ogun,
Azreal (for years without taking one hit),
Azreal and a clone of himself at the same time without taking one hit,
Matsuo
One shotting Crossbones (Cap's failed to do this with a damned shield)
Shatterstar
Bucky
Zaran
X-23
And it doesn't end there....
It's not uncommon for Logan to beat highly skilled MAs in a few panels with minimal effort... How many times has DD successfully one shotted someone with Wolverine's T-1000 rate of healing?
If I see DD one shotting people who are capible of having every organ in their body liquified only to continue to fight or get up without a moments hesitation, then perhaps I'd be more inclined to deem the feat as not PIS.... but that isn't the case is it...
Funny too is your continuous defection to a pre-multi-upgraded Sabretooth.... Humorous because....
The last time I checked, DD gave all he could handle against Sabretooth and didn't even manage to slow him down before he (DD) was incapible of continuing to fight... Sabretooth's HF at that time was not even close to as impressive as Wolverine's... In fact his fight with Wolverine slightly before the DD fight was the only implication that he even had superpowers that ranged outside of enhanced senses....
Now....
I never said that Wolverine never ate a single bite nor slept a single wink simply because that's never been a notion of mine in spite of what you feel like dictating. I DID say he hadn't ate and hadn't slept which was a generalization because quite frankly.... generally speaking of course.. he hadn't. It's pretty obvious in the story that food and sleep were on the low end of his priority list enough to make a considerable difference compared to his regular performance.... You feel compelled to argue otherwise? Fine... but where's your proof? You don't have any.. The only thing that comes close to proving your position on this case is supposition based on what you think you would do, or based on your ridiculous assertion that Wolverine needing 5 minutes to heal his arms is his usual rate of healing...
One's speculation,
the other's totally unsupported and contradicted by the same writer in the same story line 7 issues later.
There's a difference between lying about an instance and making a general assessment of the situation... Hey what issue of Black Panther did Wild Child "own Wolverine" in anyways? 😉
Where did it say Wolverine got hit with a napalm bomb again? 😉
What this comes down to is simple... All the facts, and the majority of real existing EVIDENCE lies on my side of the debate.
Yours? Not so much.. You have skewed examples, low showings, and Ennis..
that's it.
You cornered yourself, I had nothing to do with it, I just pointed it
out.
Funny that your automatic retort was an inadvertant comparison of yourelf to a child yet again.. lmao...
You know what else a child could tell me? If one had a pile of 100 blue buttons that it would be highly unlikely that one would pluck the single red button out of that pile while blindfolded.... but that's what you're doing here taking that red coated button and exclaiming that one would be able to pluck it out of the pile every time..... You're pulling on the lowest of showings, trying to compare it to other circumstantialy based low showings and attempting to create a false standard... but anyone who understands context and the CONCEPT of minority vs. majority showings can see through that like a sheet of glass.
"Lucky shot" does not sum the total of one's career not being hit
with "lucky shots"
PIS does not sum the total of Wolverine's career not being dropped by one hit.
"Nuff said"